Part of
Exploring Argumentative ContextsEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 4] 2012
► pp. 43–58
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 4] 2012
► pp. 43–58
Chapter 3. Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical and rhetorical preconditions inherent in strategic maneuvering but also on various kinds of extrinsic preconditions imposed on strategic maneuvering by the institutional macro-context of the communicative activity type in which the maneuvering takes place. Van Eemeren and Garssen use the communicative activity type of plenary debate in the European Parliament as their case in point for illustrating the problems involved.
Cited by
Cited by 9 other publications
Andone, Corina
2015. The burden of proof in dealing with political accountability. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 19 ff. 
Fairclough, Isabela
2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Chapter 17. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 309 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2017. Chapter 5. Reason and passion in political rhetoric. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 99 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 127 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 3 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Chapter 4. Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 61 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.