The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical and rhetorical preconditions inherent in strategic maneuvering but also on various kinds of extrinsic preconditions imposed on strategic maneuvering by the institutional macro-context of the communicative activity type in which the maneuvering takes place. Van Eemeren and Garssen use the communicative activity type of plenary debate in the European Parliament as their case in point for illustrating the problems involved.
2015. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 127 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 3 ff.
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.