Cover not available
Part of
Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 131–147

Entropa

Rhetoric of parody and provocation

Entropa, the controversial installation for the 2009 Czech EU-presidency, may be seen as a hoax and a provocation, but how are we to evaluate its potential for creating public debate in and about the EU? And what may this case indicate about the deliberative potential of hoaxes and similar provocative tools more generally? In exploring these issues we argue that Entropa performs ambiguous functions. It is parody and protest, official utterance and oppositional comment, support for and critique of the EU. This ambiguity creates fruitful, but also wavering discussion. Černý’s own explanation of Entropa points to what is at stake: “We wanted to find out if Europe is able to laugh at itself.” The results of this experiment remain unclear.
Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.08ber
References (44)
References
Aagaard, Martin, and Thomas Lauritzen. 2009. “Danmark tager kunstnerprovaktion i stiv arm.” Politiken . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without End. Notes on Politics . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Anda. 2009. “The art of European stereotypes.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Aristotle. [1991]. On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse . Translated by George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984 [1965]. Rabelais and his World . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2000. “Distorted Communication: Formal Pragmatics as Critical Theory.” In Perspectives on Habermas , ed. by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 3–20. Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brechenmacher, Saskia. 2010. “Entropa-Europa – or can Europe laugh at itself?” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Brummett, Barry. 1999. “Some Implications of ‘Process’ or ‘Intersubjectivity’: Postmodern Rhetoric’.” In Contemporary Rhetorical Theory , ed. by John L. Lucaites, Celeste M. Condit and Sally Caudill, 153–175. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action . Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, Leah (1998). “Polysemy: Multiple Meanings in Rhetorical Criticism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech , 84: 394–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric. The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Černý, David. 2009. “Entropa.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Charland, Maurice. 1994. “Norms and Laughter in Rhetorical Culture.” Quarterly Journal of Speech , 80: 339–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Uffe, and Lars Ole Knippel. 2009. “Skandale: Dansk kunstner misbrugt.” Jyllands-Posten . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Commission of the European Communities. 2005. The Commission’s Contribution to the Period of Reflection and Beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate . Accessed July 26, 2012: [URL]
Czech EU-presidency. 2009. “Entropa: Stereotypes are barriers to be demolished.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
“Entropa presentation.” 2009. Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
European Council. 2001. Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union . Accessed July 26, 2012: [URL]
Euro Topics. 2009. “Only eurosceptics laugh at ‘Entropa’.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere , ed. by Craig Calhoun, 109–142. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, Ib T. and Sine N. Just. 2011. “The Collaborative Paradigm: Towards an Invitational and Participatory Concept of Online Communication.” Media, Culture & Society , 37: 1095–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987 [1981]. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason . Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
. 1993 [1983]. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference , edited by Seyla Benhabib, 21–30. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Modernity: An Unfinished Project.” In Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity , ed. by Maurizio P. d’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib, 38–55. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Public Sphere. An Encyclopedia Article.” In Media and Cultural Studies. Key Works, revised version , ed. by Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas M. Kellner, 73–78. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hariman, Robert. 2008. “Political Parody and Public Culture.” Quarterly Journal of Speech , 94: 247–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, Sine N. 2004. The Constitution of Meaning – A Meaningful Constitution? Legitimacy, Identity, and Public Opinion in the Debate on the Future of Europe . Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Leff, Michael, and Ebony A. Utley. 2004. “Instrumental and Constitutive Rhetoric in Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 7: 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christoph. 1999. “Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies , 37: 617–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motl, Lubos. 2009. “Entropa: celebrating the European entropy.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL].
Morgenthal, Charlotte. 2009. “Artwork dividing the nations.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL].
Mouffe, Chantal. 1996. “Democracy, Power, and the ‘Political’.” In Democracy and Difference , ed. by Seyla Benhabib, 245–256. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research , 66: 745–758.Google Scholar
Rand, Erin J. (2008). “An Inflammatory Fag and a Queer Form: Larry Kramer, Polemics, and Rhetorical Agency.” Quarterly Journal of Speech , 94: 297–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renegar, Valerie R. & Stacey K. Sowards (2009). “Contradiction as Agency: Self-Determination, Transcendence, and Counter-Imagination in Third-Wave Feminism.” Hypatia , 24: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritzau. 2009. “Skandalekunstner undskylder overfor alle.” Jyllands-Posten . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Smith, David H. 1972. “Communication Research and the Idea of Process.” Speech Monographs , 39: 174–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Jamie. 2009. “Bulgaria insists on veiling part of EU art exhibit.” The Irish Times . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]Google Scholar
Tiefenböck, Ota. 2009. “Apolitisk kunstner i politisk protest.” Information . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]Google Scholar
Totaro, Lorenzo, and Meera Louis. 2009. “EU Covers Depiction of Bulgaria as Toilet in Artwork.” Bloomberg.com . Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL]
Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 1987. “Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.” Argumentation 1: 283–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vondra, Alexandr. 2009. “Launch of Entropa.” Accessed January 11, 2011. [URL].
Wikipedia. Undated. “Entropa.” Accessed April 15, 2013. [URL]