Cover not available
Part of
Political Argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies
David Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 155–184

The Lincoln-Douglas debates revisited

The evolution of public argument

The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 are models not of statesmanship and eloquence, as is sometimes thought, but of strategies and tactics of rhetorical invention in the context of the public forum. The debates were marked by four patterns of argument: conspiratorial, legal, historical, and moral. The dynamics of each pattern are explored and speculations are offered about the transformation of controversial questions in the crucible of public debate. With this focus, the debates are well worth scholarly and public attention.

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.08ch8
References
Angle, P.M
ed. (1947) The Lincoln reader. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
ed. (1958) Created equal? The complete Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, J.H
(1983) Affairs of party: The political culture of northern Democrats in the mid-nineteenth century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Basler, R.P
ed. (1953) Collected works of Abraham Lincoln. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 8 vols.Google Scholar
Bauer, M.G
(1927) Persuasive methods in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Quarterly journal of speech, 13:29–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, M.F
(1931) Lincoln – the speaker. Quarterly journal of speech, 17:25–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, A.J
(1928) Abraham Lincoln, 1809–1858. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Blankenship, J
(1965) State legislator as debater – Lincoln, 1835–1842. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 2:28–32.Google Scholar
Charnwood, L
(1916) Abraham Lincoln. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Cole, A.C
(1919) The centennial history of Illinois. Springfield, IL: Illinois Centennial Commission.Google Scholar
Crocker, L., comp
(1968) An analysis of Lincoln and Douglas as public speakers and debaters. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Davis, D.B
(1969) The slave power conspiracy and the paranoid style. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, D.H
(1978) Liberty and union. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Farrell, T.B
(1982) Knowledge in time: Toward an extension of rhetorical form. In Advances in argumentation theory and research (J.R. Cox & C.A. Willard, ed.), pp. 123–153. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, D.E
(1962) Prelude to greatness: Lincoln in the 1850s. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1974) Only his stepchildren: Lincoln and the Negro. Civil War history, 20:293–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1978) The Dred Scott case: Its significance in American law and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelman, P
(1981) An imperfect union: Slavery, federalism, and comity. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, W.R
(1984) Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication monographs, 51:1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985) The narrative paradigm: An elaboration. Communication monographs, 52:347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forgie, G.B
(1979) Patricide in the house divided: A psychological interpretation of Lincoln and his age. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Heckman, R.A
(1967) Lincoln vs. Douglas: The great debates campaign. Washington: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Hochmuth, M
(1954) Lincoln’s first inaugural. In American Speeches (W.M. Parrish & M. Hochmuth, ed.), pp. 21–71. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R
(1964) The paranoid style in American politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jaffa, H.V
(1959/1982) Crisis of the house divided: An interpretation of the issues in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klein, P.S
(1962) President James Buchanan: A biography. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Lanphier, C.H
(1858) Charles H. Lanphier Papers, Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library / Illinois State Historical Library.
Leff, M.C
(1983) Rhetorical timing in Lincoln’s “House Divided” speech. The Van Zelst lecture in communication. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Locin, M. & Egler, D
(1984) Mondale calls again for debates. Chicago Tribune, August 25, p. 2.Google Scholar
Luthin, R
(1960) The real Abraham Lincoln. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A
(1984) After virtue: A study in moral theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Medill, J
(1858). Joseph Medill Papers, Chicago Historical Society Library.
Neely, M.E., Jr
(1982) The Abraham Lincoln encyclopedia. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nevins, A
(1947) Ordeal of the union: A house dividing, 1852–1857. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
(1950) Ordeal of the union: Douglas, Buchanan, and party chaos. 1857–1859. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Oates, S.B
(1977) With malice toward none: The life of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca. L
(1958/1969) The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation(J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original published in French in 1958.)Google Scholar
Potter, D
(1976) The impending crisis, 1848–1861. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Randall, J.G
(1945) Lincoln the president: Springfield to Gettysburg. New York: Dodd, Mead. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Robert Todd Lincoln Collection of the Papers of Abraham Lincoln
(1947) Library of Congress.
Strozier, C.B
(1982) Lincoln’s quest for union: Public and private meanings. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wallace, K.R
(1970) Understanding discourse: The speech act and rhetorical action. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Welter, R
(1975) The mind of America, 1820–1860. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Whan, F.L
(1943/1960) Stephen A. Douglas. In A history and criticism of American public address (W.N. Brigance, ed.), vol. 2, pp. 777–827. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Wiley, E.W
(1935) Lincoln the speaker, 1830–1837. Quarterly journal of speech, 21:305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1943/1960) Abraham Lincoln: His emergence as a voice of the people. In A history and criticism of American public address (W.N. Brigance, ed.), vol. 2, pp. 859–877. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Woldman, A.A
(1936) Lawyer Lincoln. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D
(1984) Conspiracy arguments in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 21:63–75.Google Scholar