Part of
Political Argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studiesDavid Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 185–206
David Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 185–206
Philosophy and rhetoric in Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address
Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the secedes would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as “unwarranted apprehension” among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing the push to war, but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln’s philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.
References (22)
Andrews, J. R. (1990). The practice of rhetorical criticism, 2d ed. New York: Longman.
Basler, R. P., ed. (1953). The collected works of Abraham Lincoln. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. 8 vols.
Briggs, J. C. (2005). Lincoln’s speeches reconsidered. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Burlingame, M. (2008). Abraham Lincoln: A life. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2 vols.
Fisher, W. R. (1966). “The failure of compromise in 1860–1861: A rhetorical view.â€� Communication monographs, 33:364–371.
Foner, E. (2010). The fiery trial: Abraham Lincoln and American slavery. New York: Norton.
Gunderson, R. G. (1961). Lincoln and the policy of eloquent silence: November, 1860, to March, 1861.â€� Quarterly journal of speech, 47:1–9. 
Hesseltine, W. B. & Gara, L. (1963). New Governors speak for war, January, 1861. In Antislavery and disunion, 1858–1861: Studies in the rhetoric of compromise and conflict, (J. Jeffery Auer, Ed.), pp. 360–377. New York: Harper and Row.
Hochmuth, M. 1954. Lincoln’s First Inaugural. In American Speeches (W. M. Parrish and 
M. Hochmuth, (Ed.), pp. 21–71. New York: Longmans, Green.
Holzer, H. (2008). Lincoln president-elect: Abraham Lincoln and the great secession winter, 1860–1861. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Jaffa, H. V. (2000). A new birth of freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the coming of the Civil War. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Leff, M. (1988). Dimensions of temporality in Lincoln’s Second Inaugural. Communication ÂReports, 1:26–31. Reprinted in James R. Andrews, The Practice of Rhetorical Criticism, 80–85.
. (1983). Rhetorical timing in Lincoln’s ‘House Divided’ speech. The Van Zelst lecture in communication. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Leff, M. & Sachs, A. (1990).“Words the most like thingsâ€�: Iconicity and the rhetorical text.â€� Western Journal of Communication, 54:252–273.
Nichols, M. H. (1963). Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address. In Antislavery and disunion: Studies in the rhetoric of compromise and Conflict, 392–414. New York: Harper and Row.
Tackach, J. (2002). Lincoln’s moral vision: The Second Inaugural Address. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Walton, D. N. (1998). Ad Hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
White, R. C., Jr. (2009). A. Lincoln: A Biography. New York: Random House.
White, R. C, Jr. (2005). The eloquent president: A Portrait of Lincoln Through His Words. New York: Random House.
White, R. C., Jr. (2002). Lincoln’s Greatest Speech: The Second Inaugural. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wills, G. (1999). “Lincoln’s Greatest Speech?â€� Atlantic Monthly, September, 60–70.
Wilson, D. N. (2006). Lincoln’s sword: The Presidency and the power of words. New York: Knopf.