Cover not available
Part of
Political Argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies
David Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 255–280

Making the case for war

Colin Powell at the United Nations

Largely because of his personal credibility, Secretary of State Colin Powell was chosen to present the Bush Administration’s case for military action against Iraq. The scene resembled Adlai Stevenson’s speech during the Cuban missile crisis. Although he presented other arguments as well, Powell focused on the danger that Iraq might be developing weapons of mass destruction. Powell’s case was well organized, incorporating subordinative, multiple, and coordinative arguments strategically, and the inferences from premises to conclusions were reasonable. In retrospect, the flaw in the speech was in the accuracy of the evidence, a concept which scholars of argument have undertheorized.

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.13ch13
References
Andrade, J
(2003) Though Powell was brilliant … his evidence did not measure up. Chicago Sun-Times, February 7, p. 33.Google Scholar
Auster, B.B., Mazzetti, M. & Pound, E.T
(2003) Truth and consequences. U.S. News and World Report, June 9, p. 14.Google Scholar
Babbin, J
(2003) Gunsmoke. National review online.Google Scholar
Balz, D
(2003) Carter says Bush has “not made a case” for war. Washington Post, February 1, p. A18.Google Scholar
Barnes, F
(2003) Secretary Powell goes to the U.N. Daily Standard. February 5.Google Scholar
Barrett, J
(2003) Powell made his case. Newsweek [web exclusive], February 8.Google Scholar
Benedetto, R
(2003) More people favor a war in Iraq. USA Today, February 11.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, B
(2003) The big difference between intelligence and evidence. Washington Post, February 2, p. B1.Google Scholar
Bush, G.W
(2003) State of the Union address. Available at [URL][URL] (accessed November 10, 2006).
Cockburn, A
(2003) The great “intelligence” fraud. The Nation, March 3, p. 88.Google Scholar
Cornwall, R
(2003a) Iraq the threat of war: Powell to present “proof” of Saddam’s banned weapons. The Independent [London],January 30, p. 2.Google Scholar
(2003b) A masterly display by a trusted American. The Independent [London], February 6, title page.Google Scholar
Dao, J. & Shanker, T
(2003) After the war: Evidence; Powell defends information he used to justify Iraq war. New York Times, May 31, p. A6.Google Scholar
DeYoung, K
(2006) Soldier: The life of Colin Powell. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Dobbs, M
(2003) At Council, political theater. Washington Post, February 6, p. A3.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F
(2002) Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehninger, D. & Brockriede, W
(1963) Decision by debate. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Elliott, M. & Frank, M
(2003) Countdown to war. Time, February 17, p. 24.Google Scholar
Gordon, M.R
(2003) Threats and responses: News analysis; Powell’s trademark: Overwhelm them. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
Hartnett, S.J. & Stengrim, L.A
(2006) Globalization and empire: The U.S. invasion of Iraq, free markets, and the twilight of democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh, M. & Isikoff, M
. with others (2003) No more hide and seek. Newsweek, February 10, pp. 42–46.Google Scholar
Hitt, G
(2003) State of the Union: The day after: U.S. stand on Iraq is entering “final phase” – With time running out, White House to meet allies on need for military action. Wall Street Journal, January 30, p. A10.Google Scholar
Isikoff, M. & Lipper, T
(2004) The dots never existed. Newsweek, July 19, p. 36.Google Scholar
Kessler, G
(2003) Powell: Case “compelling” without “smoking gun.” Washington Post, February 4, p. A18.Google Scholar
(2004) Analyst questioned sources’ reliability; warning came before Powell report to U.N. Washington Post,July 10, p. A9.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. & DeYoung, K
(2003) Powell to tell U.N. Council of arms evidence. Washington Post, January 29, p. A1.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. & Lynch, C
(2003a) Powell hones Iraq evidence for crucial U.N. address. Washington Post, February 5, p. A1.Google Scholar
(2003b) Powell lays out case against Iraq: Evidence shows Hussein foiled inspections, Secretary tells U.N. Washington Post, February 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
Klumpp, J.F
(2006) Facts, truth, and Iraq: A call to stewardship of democratic argument. In Engaging Argument (Patricia Riley, Ed.), pp. 1–17. Washington: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Krugman, P
(2005) The war president. New York Times, June 24, p. A23.Google Scholar
Leeman, R.W
(2005) Colin Luther Powell. In American voices: An encyclopedia of contemporary oratory (B.K. Duffy & R.W. Leeman, Ed.), pp. 368–377. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
May, C.D
(2003) Adlai Stevenson moments. National Review Online, February 5.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.R
(2006) Team B intelligence coups. Quarterly journal of speech, 92: 144–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.T
(2003) Disorder takes over for a day at usually staid U.N. building. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.Google Scholar
Nichols, B
(2003) Powell shares new evidence. USA Today, February 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
Nichols, B. & Slavin, B
(2004) What comes to light in Iraq reflects on Powell. USA Today, February 5, p. 12A.Google Scholar
Powell to lay out evidence at U.N
(2003) Seattle Times, February 6, p. A2.Google Scholar
Preston, J
(2003) Threats and responses: Report to Council; U.S. inspector says Iraq falls short on cooperation. New York Times, January 28, p. A1.
Preston, J. & Weisman, S.R
(2003) Threats and responses: Diplomacy; Powell to charge Iraq is shifting its illegal arms to foil inspectors. New York Times, February 5, p. A1.
Priest, D
(2003) Telling secrets: Not just what, but how; speech is revealing on gathering intelligence. Washington Post, February 6, p. A23.Google Scholar
Purdum, T.S
(2002) Threats and responses: The administration, Bush officials say the time has come for action on Iraq. New York Times, September 9, pp. A1, A8.Google Scholar
Ritchburg, K.B
(2003) Speech fails to budge Europeans from their divergent positions. ­Washington Post, February 6, p. A30.Google Scholar
Robbins, C.A. & Cloud, D.S
(2003) As the U.S. pressures Iraq, a flurry of initiatives – Officials say belief of link to al Qaeda appears hard to prove. Wall Street Journal, January 31, p. A8.
Sanger, D.E
(2003) Threats and responses: Intelligence; Bush officials debate release of Iraqi secrets. New York Times, January 30, p. A1.Google Scholar
(2004) Powell says C.I.A. was misled about weapons. New York Times, May 17, p. A8.Google Scholar
Sengupta, K
(2003) Intelligence agencies doubt al-Qa’ida links. The Independent, February 4 (Foreign news, p. 12).Google Scholar
Slavin, B. & Diamond, J
(2003) Case is strongest when “biggest dove” makes it. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.Google Scholar
Slevin, P
(2003) Data on efforts to hide arms called “strong suit” of speech. Washington Post. February 6, p. A28.Google Scholar
Steinberger, M
(2004) Misoverestimated. The American Prospect, April, pp. 18–24.Google Scholar
Stillion Southard, B
(2005) Heightened alert: The altered role of “evidence” in the “case” for war. In Critical Problems in Argumentation (C.A. Willard, Ed.), pp. 733–739. Washington: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Suskind, R
(2006) The one percent doctrine: Deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
The case made clearer – Dealing with Iraq
(2003) The Economist, February 8.Google Scholar
Threats and responses: European press; Powell’s performance earns mixed reviews
(2003) New York Times, February 7, p. A10.Google Scholar
USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll
(2003) February 4, p. 9A.
van den Heuvel, K
(2003) Powell fails to make case. USA Today, February 12, p. 12A.Google Scholar
Vest, J
(2004) The wrong target. The American Prospect, April, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
Walton, D.N
(1996) Arguments from ignorance. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Weisman, S.R
(2003) Threats and responses: Security Council; Powell, in U.N. speech, presents case to show Iraq has not disarmed. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
(2005) Powell calls his U.N. speech a lasting blot on his record. New York Times, September 9, p. A10.Google Scholar
Wolffe, R. & Hirsh, M
(2003) War and consequences. Newsweek, February 3, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
Woodward, B
(2004) Plan of attack. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Zacharia, J
(2003). Reading Bush’s mind. Jerusalem Post, January 31, p. 3B.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D
(2006) Terrorism and the argument from ignorance. In Engaging argument (P. Riley, Ed.), pp. 29–35. Washington: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
(2011)  Public speaking: Strategies for success . 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar