Making the case for war
Colin Powell at the United Nations
Largely because of his personal credibility, Secretary of State Colin Powell was chosen to present the Bush Administration’s case for military action against Iraq. The scene resembled Adlai Stevenson’s speech during the Cuban missile crisis. Although he presented other arguments as well, Powell focused on the danger that Iraq might be developing weapons of mass destruction. Powell’s case was well organized, incorporating subordinative, multiple, and coordinative arguments strategically, and the inferences from premises to conclusions were reasonable. In retrospect, the flaw in the speech was in the accuracy of the evidence, a concept which scholars of argument have undertheorized.
References (64)
Andrade, J. (2003). Though Powell was brilliant … his evidence did not measure up. Chicago Sun-Times, February 7, p. 33.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auster, B.B., Mazzetti, M. & Pound, E.T. (2003). Truth and consequences. U.S. News and World Report, June 9, p. 14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Babbin, J. (2003). Gunsmoke. National review online.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balz, D. (2003). Carter says Bush has “not made a case” for war. Washington Post, February 1, p. A18.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnes, F. (2003). Secretary Powell goes to the U.N. Daily Standard. February 5.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, J. (2003). Powell made his case. Newsweek [web exclusive], February 8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benedetto, R. (2003). More people favor a war in Iraq. USA Today, February 11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkowitz, B. (2003). The big difference between intelligence and evidence. Washington Post, February 2, p. B1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bush, G.W. (2003). State of the Union address. Available at [URL][URL] (accessed November 10, 2006).
Cockburn, A. (2003). The great “intelligence” fraud. The Nation, March 3, p. 88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornwall, R. (2003a). Iraq the threat of war: Powell to present “proof” of Saddam’s banned weapons. The Independent [London],January 30, p. 2.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornwall, R. (2003b). A masterly display by a trusted American. The Independent [London], February 6, title page.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dao, J. & Shanker, T. (2003). After the war: Evidence; Powell defends information he used to justify Iraq war. New York Times, May 31, p. A6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeYoung, K. (2006). Soldier: The life of Colin Powell. New York: Knopf.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobbs, M. (2003). At Council, political theater. Washington Post, February 6, p. A3.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehninger, D. & Brockriede, W. (1963). Decision by debate. New York: Dodd, Mead.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elliott, M. & Frank, M. (2003). Countdown to war. Time, February 17, p. 24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, M.R. (2003). Threats and responses: News analysis; Powell’s trademark: Overwhelm them. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartnett, S.J. & Stengrim, L.A. (2006). Globalization and empire: The U.S. invasion of Iraq, free markets, and the twilight of democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirsh, M. & Isikoff, M. with others. (2003). No more hide and seek. Newsweek, February 10, pp. 42–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hitt, G. (2003). State of the Union: The day after: U.S. stand on Iraq is entering “final phase” – With time running out, White House to meet allies on need for military action. Wall Street Journal, January 30, p. A10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Isikoff, M. & Lipper, T. (2004). The dots never existed. Newsweek, July 19, p. 36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kessler, G. (2003). Powell: Case “compelling” without “smoking gun.” Washington Post, February 4, p. A18.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kessler, G. (2004). Analyst questioned sources’ reliability; warning came before Powell report to U.N. Washington Post,July 10, p. A9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kessler, G. & DeYoung, K. (2003). Powell to tell U.N. Council of arms evidence. Washington Post, January 29, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kessler, G. & Lynch, C. (2003a). Powell hones Iraq evidence for crucial U.N. address. Washington Post, February 5, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kessler, G. & Lynch, C. (2003b). Powell lays out case against Iraq: Evidence shows Hussein foiled inspections, Secretary tells U.N. Washington Post, February 6, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klumpp, J.F. (2006). Facts, truth, and Iraq: A call to stewardship of democratic argument. In Engaging Argument (Patricia Riley, Ed.), pp. 1–17. Washington: National Communication Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krugman, P. (2005). The war president. New York Times, June 24, p. A23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leeman, R.W. (2005). Colin Luther Powell. In American voices: An encyclopedia of contemporary oratory (B.K. Duffy & R.W. Leeman, Ed.), pp. 368–377. Westport, CT: Greenwood.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
May, C.D. (2003). Adlai Stevenson moments. National Review Online, February 5.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, G.R. (2006). Team B intelligence coups. Quarterly journal of speech, 92: 144–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, M.T. (2003). Disorder takes over for a day at usually staid U.N. building. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, B. (2003). Powell shares new evidence. USA Today, February 6, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, B. & Slavin, B. (2004). What comes to light in Iraq reflects on Powell. USA Today, February 5, p. 12A.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Powell to lay out evidence at U.N. (2003). Seattle Times, February 6, p. A2.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, J. (2003). Threats and responses: Report to Council; U.S. inspector says Iraq falls short on cooperation. New York Times, January 28, p. A1.
Preston, J. & Weisman, S.R. (2003). Threats and responses: Diplomacy; Powell to charge Iraq is shifting its illegal arms to foil inspectors. New York Times, February 5, p. A1.
Priest, D. (2003). Telling secrets: Not just what, but how; speech is revealing on gathering intelligence. Washington Post, February 6, p. A23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Purdum, T.S. (2002). Threats and responses: The administration, Bush officials say the time has come for action on Iraq. New York Times, September 9, pp. A1, A8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritchburg, K.B. (2003). Speech fails to budge Europeans from their divergent positions. Washington Post, February 6, p. A30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robbins, C.A. & Cloud, D.S. (2003). As the U.S. pressures Iraq, a flurry of initiatives – Officials say belief of link to al Qaeda appears hard to prove. Wall Street Journal, January 31, p. A8.
Sanger, D.E. (2003). Threats and responses: Intelligence; Bush officials debate release of Iraqi secrets. New York Times, January 30, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sanger, D.E. (2004). Powell says C.I.A. was misled about weapons. New York Times, May 17, p. A8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sengupta, K. (2003). Intelligence agencies doubt al-Qa’ida links. The Independent, February 4 (Foreign news, p. 12).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slavin, B. & Diamond, J. (2003). Case is strongest when “biggest dove” makes it. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slevin, P. (2003). Data on efforts to hide arms called “strong suit” of speech. Washington Post. February 6, p. A28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinberger, M. (2004). Misoverestimated. The American Prospect, April, pp. 18–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stillion Southard, B. (2005). Heightened alert: The altered role of “evidence” in the “case” for war. In Critical Problems in Argumentation (C.A. Willard, Ed.), pp. 733–739. Washington: National Communication Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suskind, R. (2006). The one percent doctrine: Deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
The case made clearer – Dealing with Iraq. (2003). The Economist, February 8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Threats and responses: European press; Powell’s performance earns mixed reviews. (2003). New York Times, February 7, p. A10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll. (2003). February 4, p. 9A.
van den Heuvel, K. (2003). Powell fails to make case. USA Today, February 12, p. 12A.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vest, J. (2004). The wrong target. The American Prospect, April, pp. 29–33.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, D.N. (1996). Arguments from ignorance. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weisman, S.R. (2003). Threats and responses: Security Council; Powell, in U.N. speech, presents case to show Iraq has not disarmed. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weisman, S.R. (2005). Powell calls his U.N. speech a lasting blot on his record. New York Times, September 9, p. A10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolffe, R. & Hirsh, M. (2003). War and consequences. Newsweek, February 3, pp. 22–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodward, B. (2004). Plan of attack. New York: Simon & Schuster.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zacharia, J. (2003). Reading Bush’s mind. Jerusalem Post, January 31, p. 3B.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zarefsky, D. (2006). Terrorism and the argument from ignorance. In Engaging argument (P. Riley, Ed.), pp. 29–35. Washington: National Communication Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zarefsky, D. (2011).
Public speaking: Strategies for success
. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)