Article published In:
Transdisciplinarity in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Daniel Perrin and Claire Kramsch
[AILA Review 31] 2018
► pp. 143148
References
Beckwith, A., & Crichton, J.
(2014) Homework setting in cognitive behavioural therapy: A study of discursive strategies. Communication and Medicine, 11(2), 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrd Clark, J.
(2016) Transdisciplinary approaches to language learning and teaching in transnational times. Introduction to the Special Issue. L2 Journal, 8(4), 2–19.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N.
(2002) Introduction. In C. N. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 1–36). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Crichton, J., & O’Neill, F.
(2016) Risk and safety in linguistic and cultural diversity: A narrative intervention in residential aged care. In J. Crichton, C. N. Candlin, & A. Firkins (Eds.), Communicating risk. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1966) Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G.
(2004) Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans. second ed.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Galletly, C., & Crichton, J.
(2011) Accomplishments of the thought disordered person: A case study in psychiatrist-patient interaction. Medical Hypotheses, 771, 90–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramling, D.
(2016) Researching multilingually in german studies . A brief retrospective. German Studies Review, 39(3), 529–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(2001) New ways of meaning. The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Muhlhausler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics reader. Language, ecology and environment (pp. 175–202). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S.
(1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2 ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T.
(1986) The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N.
(2014) Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S.
(2015) Experts on experts: Sustaining ‘communities of interest’ in professional discourse studies. In M. Gotti, S. Maci, & M. Sala (Eds.), Insights into medical communication (pp. 25–50). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N.
(2001) ‘Motivational relevancies’: Some methodological reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, & C. N. Candlin (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory (pp. 350–387). Harlow, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S.
(2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 301(1024–1054). DOI logoGoogle Scholar