Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Linguistic Recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings
Edited by Lauri Haapanen and Daniel Perrin
[AILA Review 33] 2020
► pp. 1–20
Introduction

Linguistic recycling

The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings

 | University of Jyväskylä
 | Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Article outline
  • 1.Hence, recycling: Defining the key terms
    • 1.1Quoting
    • 1.2Recontextualization
    • 1.3Linguistic recycling
    • 1.4Medium
  • 2.Playing for keeps: Topical relevance of the contributions
    • 2.1Stakeholders
      • Paper I.The invisible supporters: Writing for reuseEva-Maria Jakobs & Claas Digmayer
      • Paper II.Linguistic recycling and its relationship to academic conflict: An analysis of authors’ responses to direct quotationSally Burgess & Pedro Martín-Martín
    • 2.2Language
      • Paper III.Recycling a genre for news automation: The production of Valtteri the Election Bot Lauri Haapanen & Leo Leppänen
      • Paper IV.Linguistic recycling in language acquisition: Child-directed speech and child speech in the study of language acquisitionKlaus Laalo & Reili Argus
    • 2.3Domain
      • Paper V.Narrative analysis applied to text production: Investigating the processes of quoting in the making of a broadcast news storyGilles Merminod
      • Paper VI.Reuse in STEM research writing: Rhetorical and practical considerations and challengesChris M. Anson, Susanne Hall, Michael Pemberton, & Cary Moskovitz
    • 2.4Culture
      • Paper VII.Quoting to persuade: A critical linguistic analysis of quoting in US, UK, and Australian newspaper opinion textsJennifer Cope
      • Paper VIII.Reporting quotable yet untranslatable speech: Observations of shifting practices by Japanese newspapers from Obama to TrumpKayo Matsushita
    • 2.5Media
      • Paper IX.Visuo-material performances: ‘Literalized’ quotations in prime minister’s questionsElisabeth Reber
      • Paper X.More than recycled snippets of news: Quote cards as recontextualized discourse on social mediaDaniel Pfurtscheller
  • 3.Drivers in the helix: Towards a model of linguistic recycling
    • 3.1Linguistic recycling is realized through practices of augmenting linguistic capital
    • 3.2Linguistic recycling is characterized by the interplay of five key drivers
    • 3.3Linguistic recycling is endlessly recursive
    • 3.4Linguistic recycling transgresses boundaries between up- and downcycling
  • 4.Next cycle: Taking the discussion to the virtual space
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 7 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00027.int
References (12)
References
Agar, M. H. (2004). We have met the other and we’re all nonlinear. Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system. Complexity, 10(2), 16–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Haapanen, L. (2017). Quoting practices in written journalism. Article-based doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki. Available from <[URL]>
Haapanen, L., & Perrin, D. (2017). Media and quoting. Understanding the purposes, roles, and processes of quoting in mass and social media. In D. Perrin & C. Cotter (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp. 424–441). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Translingual quoting in journalism: Behind the scenes of Swiss television newsrooms. In L. Davier & K. Conway (Eds.), Journalism and translation in the era of convergence (pp. 15–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, F. (2014). Linguistic capitalism and algorithmic mediation. Representations, 127(1), 57–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, W. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (2016). How the world changed social media. London: UCL Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Haapanen, Lauri & Daniel Perrin
2024. Embracing the unexpected: Exploring the role of serendipity in newswriting. Discourse & Communication DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2024. Online public denunciation as recursive social practice. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut, Michael Haugh & Chaoqun Xie
2023. Editorial: Recontextualization: Modes, media, and practices. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Pfurtscheller, Daniel
2023. Zitieren via Screenshot. Digitale Pragmatik und Medialität bildbasierter Zitierpraktiken. In Digitale Pragmatik [Digitale Linguistik, 1], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Pfurtscheller, Daniel
2024. Digitale Live-Öffentlichkeiten: Eine medienlinguistische Analyse von parlamentarischen Live-Tickern auf DerStandard.at. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 52:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Cope, Jen
2020. Quoting to persuade. AILA Review 33 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.