Article published in:
Linguistic Recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings
Edited by Lauri Haapanen and Daniel Perrin
[AILA Review 33] 2020
► pp. 120135


Reuse in STEM research writing


American Chemical Society
(1986) ACS ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. In The ACS Style Guide (pp. 217–222). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. https://​pubs​.acs​.org​/userimages​/ContentEditor​/1218054468605​/ethics​.pdf
n.d.). American Chemical Society Journal publishing agreement, Form A: Authors who hold copyright and works-for-hire. http://​pubsapp​.acs​.org​/paragonplus​/copyright​/jpa​_form​_a​.pdf
Anson, C. M., & Anson, I. G.
(2019) Text recycling in STEM disciplines: Results from a text-analytic study. Paper delivered at the 8th International Conference on Writing Analytics, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Anson, C. M., & Schwegler, R. A.
(2012) Tracking the mind’s eye: A new technology for researching 21st century writing and reading processes. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 151–171.Google Scholar
Anson, I. G., Moskovitz, C., & Anson, C. M.
(2019) A text-analytic method for identifying text recycling in STEM research reports. Journal of Writing Analytics, 3, 125–150.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1994) Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–99). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Committee on Publication Ethics
(2013) Text recycling guidelines. Retrieved from https://​publicationethics​.org​/text​-recycling​-guidelines (13 May, 2020).
Cooke, S., & Donaldson, M.
(2014) Self-citation by researchers: Narcissism or an inevitable outcome of a cohesive and sustained research program? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1–2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
COPE Council
. COPE discussion document: Citation manipulation. July 2019 doi:  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, A. J.
(1991) Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. G. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336–355). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, T.
(2000) Making sense of computer-mediated communication (CMC): Conversations as genres, CMC systems as genre ecologies. In R. H. Sprague Jr. (Ed.), 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui: IEEE Computer Society Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilliver, S.
(2012) Forgive me for repeating myself: Self-plagiarism in the medical literature. Medical Writing, 21(2), 150–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. M.
(1992) A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(2), 233–246.Google Scholar
Kostouli, T.
(2009) A sociocultural framework: Writing as social practice. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 98–116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lander, E. S.
(2016) The Heroes of CRISPR. Cell, 164(1–2), 18–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moskovitz, C.
(2019) Text recycling in scientific writing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 813–851. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, M., Hall, S., Moskovitz, C., & Anson, C. M.
(2019) Journal editors’ views on text recycling: An interview-based study. Learned Publishing, 32(4), 355–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smidt, J.
(2002) Double histories in multivocal classrooms: Notes toward an ecological account of writing. Written Communication, 19(3): 414–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar