Article published in:Linguistic Recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings
Edited by Lauri Haapanen and Daniel Perrin
[AILA Review 33] 2020
► pp. 120–135
Reuse in STEM research writing
Rhetorical and practical considerations and challenges
Text recycling (hereafter TR), sometimes problematically called “self-plagiarism,” involves the verbatim reuse of text from one’s own existing documents in a newly created text – such as the duplication of a paragraph or section from a published article in a new article. Although plagiarism is widely eschewed across academia and the publishing industry, the ethics of TR are not agreed upon and are currently being vigorously debated. As part of a federally funded (US) National Science Foundation grant, we have been studying TR patterns using several methodologies, including interviews with editors about TR values and practices (Pemberton, Hall, Moskovitz, & Anson, 2019) and digitally mediated text-analytic processes to determine the extent of TR in academic publications in the biological sciences, engineering, mathematical and physical sciences, and social, behavioral, and economic sciences (Anson, Moskovitz, & Anson, 2019). In this article, we first describe and illustrate TR in the context of academic writing. We then explain and document several themes that emerged from interviews with publishers of peer-reviewed academic journals. These themes demonstrate the vexed and unsettled nature of TR as a discursive phenomenon in academic writing and publishing. In doing so, we focus on the complex relationships between personal (role-based) and social (norm-based) aspects of scientific publication, complicating conventional models of the writing process that have inadequately accounted for authorial decisions about accuracy, efficiency, self-representation, adherence to existing or imagined rules and norms, perceptions of ownership and copyright, and fears of impropriety.
Keywords: text recycling, self-plagiarism, citation, source use, quotation, STEM writing
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at email@example.com.
Published online: 07 October 2020
American Chemical Society
(1986) ACS ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. In The ACS Style Guide (pp. 217–222). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. https://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf
n.d.). American Chemical Society Journal publishing agreement, Form A: Authors who hold copyright and works-for-hire. http://pubsapp.acs.org/paragonplus/copyright/jpa_form_a.pdf
Anson, C. M., & Anson, I. G.
(2019) Text recycling in STEM disciplines: Results from a text-analytic study. Paper delivered at the 8th International Conference on Writing Analytics, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Anson, C. M., & Schwegler, R. A.
Anson, I. G., Moskovitz, C., & Anson, C. M.
Committee on Publication Ethics
(2013) Text recycling guidelines. Retrieved from https://publicationethics.org/text-recycling-guidelines (13 May, 2020).
Cooke, S., & Donaldson, M.
Devitt, A. J.
Pemberton, M., Hall, S., Moskovitz, C., & Anson, C. M.