Article published in:
Developing shared languages: The fundamentals of mutual learning and problem solving in transdisciplinary collaboration
Edited by Marlies Whitehouse, Henrik Rahm and Séverine Wozniak
[AILA Review 34:1] 2021
► pp. 5778
References

References

De Haan, E.
(2019) A systematic review of qualitative studies in workplace and executive coaching: The emergence of a body of research. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(4), 227–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2021) What works in executive coaching. Understanding outcomes through quantitative research and practice-based evidence. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 75 ]
Deplazes, S.
(2016) KaSyCo: Kategoriensysteme zur Analyse von Coachingprozessen. Kassel University Press.Google Scholar
Deplazes, S., Graf, E.-M., & Künzli, H.
(2018) Das TSPP-Model. Eine Blaupause für die Coaching-Prozessforschung. Coaching Theor. Prax., 4, 69–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillery-Travis, A., & Cox, E.
(2018) Researching coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachirova, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of coaching (3rd ed., pp. 518–535). Sage.Google Scholar
Fischer-Epe, M.
(2012) Coaching: Miteinander Ziele erreichen. Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E.-M.
(2019) The pragmatics of executive coaching. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E.-M., & Dionne, F.
(2021) Coaching research in 2020 – About destinations, journeys and travelers, Part I. International Coaching Psychology Review, 16(1), 36–50.Google Scholar
Graf, E.-M., Dionne, F., & Spranz-Fogasy, T.
(2020) How to investigate the local and global change potential of questioning sequences in executive coaching? A call for interdisciplinary research. Scandinavian Studies in Language, 11(1), 214–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E.-M., & Kabatnik, S.
under review). “[W]ie und was können Sie noch besser organisieren, um auch Freiräume sich zu sichern? […] Wo kann das irgendwie noch effektiver, ((1,2s)) ja, gestaltet werden?” – Lösungsorientierte Fragen im Führungskräfte-Coaching aus gesprächsanalytischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Angewante Linguistik.
Graf, E.-M., & Spranz-Fogasy, T.
(2018) Welche Frage, Wann und Warum? Eine qualitativ-linguistische Programmatik zur Erforschung von Frage-Sequenzen als zentrale Veränderungspraktik im Coaching. Coaching Theor. Prax., 4, 17–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E.-M., Spranz-Fogasy, T., & Künzli, H.
(2020) Questioning sequences in coaching. DACH-research project funded by the FWF, DFG and SNF.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Gerrard, B.
(2019) Comparing problem-focused, solution-focused and problem-focused/solution-focused coaching approach. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., & O’Connor, S.
(2010) The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions: A pilot study with implications for practice. Industrial and Commercial Training, 42(2), 102–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. & O’Connor, S.
(2019) A brief primer for those new to coaching research and evidence-based practice. The Coaching Psychologist, 15(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Greif, S., & Benning-Rohnke, E.
(2015) Konsequente Umsetzung von Zielen durch Coaching: Praktisch nützliche Erkenntnisse aus der Grundlagenforschung und ihre Anwendung. Coaching Theor. Prax., 1(1), 25–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köller, W.
(2004) Perspektivität und Sprache: Zur Struktur von Objektivierungsformen in Bildern, im Denken und in der Sprache. De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, U., & Stiles, W. B.
(2015) The responsiveness problem in psychotherapy: A review of proposed solutions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(3), 277–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loebbert, M., & Wilmes, C.
(2013) Coaching als Beratung. In M. Loebbert (Ed.), Professional coaching. Konzepte, Instrumente, Anwendungsfelder (pp. 17–48). Schäffer Poeschel.Google Scholar
Peltier, B.
(2010) The psychology of executive coaching. Theory and application. Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 76 ]
Pennycook, A.
(2018) Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review, 31, 113–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, A.
(2019) Conversation analysis and psychotherapy: Identifying transformative sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 257–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D.
(2018) On, for and with practitioners. A transdisciplinary approach to text production in real-life settings. AILA Review, 31, 53–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D., & Kramsch, C.
(2018) Introduction: Transdisciplinarity in applied linguistics. AILA Review, 31, 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S.
(2003) Uptake of discourse research in interprofessional settings: Reporting from medical consultancy. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 338–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G.
(1949) The Concept of Mind. Penguin.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S.
(2002) Discourse practitioners as a community of interprofessional practice. In C. N. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 95–135). City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
(2005) The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 371–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Experts on experts: Sustaining ‘communities of interest’ in professional discourse studies. In M. Gotti, S. Maci, & M. Sala (Eds.), Insights into medical communication (pp. 25–47). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N.
(2011) Professional and organisational practice: A discourse/communication perspective. In S. Sarangi & C. N. Candlin (Eds.), Handbook of communication in organisations and professions (pp. 3–58). De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schermuly, C. C.
(2019) Erfolgreiches Business-Coaching. Positive Wirkungen, unerwünschte Nebenwirkungen und vermeidbare Abbrüche. Beltz.Google Scholar
Schön, D.
(1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schreyögg, A.
(2012) Coaching. Eine Einführung für Praxis und Ausbildung (2nd ed.). Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Spence, G. B.
(2007) GAS powered coaching: Goal attainment scaling and its use in coaching research and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 155–167.Google Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, T.
(2020) Fragen und ihre Funktionen in psychotherapeutischen Gesprächen. In H. Gruber, J. Spitzmüller & R. de Cillia (Eds.), Institutionelle und organisationale Kommunikation. Theorie, Methodologie, Empirie und Kritik (pp. 39–69). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, T., Graf, E.-M., Ehrenthal, J. C., & Nikendei, C.
(2019) Beispiel-Nachfragen im Kontext von Veränderung: Elitizierungs- und Prozessierungsstrategien in Psychotherapie und Coaching-Gesprächen. In E.-M. Graf, C. Scarvaglieri, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Pragmatik der Veränderung. Problem- und lösungsorientierte Kommunikation in helfenden Berufen (pp. 177–209). Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E., & Sikveland, R.
(2016) Formulating solutions in mediation. Journal of Pragmatics, 105, 101–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 77 ]
Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. M.
(2016) The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions on the affect, attentional control and cognitive flexibility of undergraduate students experiencing study-related stress. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 460–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K., & Robles, J.
(2009) Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 11(2), 131–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, S.
(1999) Structures of counselling interaction. A conversation analytic study of counselling encounters in career guidance training. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J.
(2011) Therapeutic change in interaction: conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M., Rahm, H., & Wozniak, S.
(2021) Developing shared languages: The fundamentals of mutual learning and problem solving in transdisciplinary collaboration. AILA Review, 34(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, L., Kimsey-House, K., Kimsey-House, H., & Sandahl, P.
(1998) Co-active coaching. New skills for coaching people toward success in work and life. Davis Black.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(2018) Applied linguistics as transdisciplinary practice: What’s in a prefix? AILA Review, 31, 135–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar