Academically elite students in Singapore
A collective moral stance toward aspirations and trajectories
This paper draws on a Linguistic Ethnography (Blommaert & Rampton 2011) of a group of academically elite students in Singapore. The group comprises locals born in Singapore, as well as immigrants from China and Vietnam. My informants all attended a top-ranked secondary school in Singapore. I present data from interviews and a focus group discussion with them about their aspirations and educational pathways. These academically elite students describe a conventional aspiration amongst their peers involving transnational mobility and attending top-ranked universities in the US and UK. My informants discursively construct this aspiration as preferred, with a sense that they are expected to conform to such a trajectory. I argue that their consistent orientation toward the ideal trajectory and production of discourse about it denotes a collective moral stance (Ochs & Capps 2002), and hence a disposition embedded in a social field (Hanks 2005). In response to Archer’s (2012) theorisations that dominant modes of reflexivity have changed, my informants’ relatively stable orientations and ways of acting demonstrate how Bourdieu’s notion of habitus continues to be relevant in late-modernity. In practical terms, this study also shows a clear link between elite schools, and the aspirations and resultant trajectories of individuals. This has direct implications for policy-makers in Singapore where the Ministry of Education has been attempting to curb elitism in the education system.
References (59)
Archer, M. 2010. Routine, reflexivity and realism. Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303.
Archer, M. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP.
Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baynham, M. 2011. Stance, positioning and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 401: 63–74.
Baynham, M. 2013. Narrative analysis. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (eds), 69–84. London: Bloomsbury.
Beck, U. 1992. The Risk Society. London: Sage.
Benton-Short, L. & Price, M. 2008. Introduction. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 1–22. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13 (2): 1–82.
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–58. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chia, S. & Toh, K. 2012. Scrapping PSLE not the solution: Lawrence Wong”. The Straits Times, September 12.
Dawson, M. 2010. Bauman, Beck, Giddens and our understanding of politics in late modernity. Journal of Power 3 (2): 189–207.
Du Bois, J. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], R. Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gee, J. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP.
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CUP.
Hanks, W. 1995. Language and Communicative Practices. New York NY: Westview Press.
Hanks, W. 2005. Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 341: 67–83.
Jaffe, A. 1999. Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaffe, A. 2009. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, A. Jaffe (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP.
Kiesling, S. 2011. Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Presented at the iMean conference, 15 April 2011. The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. <[URL]>
Koh, A. 2010. Tactical Globalisation: Learning from the Singapore Experiment. Bern: Peter Lang.
Lim, L. 2012. Meritocracy, elitism and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 1–14.
Lu, L. Forthcoming. ‘Designer immigrant students’ in Singapore: Challenges for linguistic human rights in a globalizing world. In Engaging Superdiversity, K. Arnaut, M. Karrebæk & M. Spotti (eds). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ministry of Education. 2012. MOE removes Secondary School Banding and revamps school awards. Press release. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education. 2013. Direct School Admission (DSA) – Method and review processes. Parliamentary reply. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education. 2015. Choosing your secondary schools for admission to Secondary One in 2016. Singapore: Ministry of Education. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education. 2016. Changes to PSLE scoring and Secondary One posting. Press release. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website a. Secondary Education. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website b. Integrated programme. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website c. Every school a good school. <[URL]>
National University of Singapore website. Students and graduate statistics. <[URL]>
Ng, J. Y. 2013 August 19. PSLE scores to be scrapped, students to be given grades. <[URL]>
Ng, P. T. 2013. The global war for talent: Responses and challenges in the Singapore Higher Education system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (3): 280–292.
Noble, G. 2013. ‘It is home but it is not home’: Habitus, field and the migrant. Journal of Sociology 49 (2–3): 341–356.
Ochs, E. & Capps, L. 2002. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Ong, A. 2007. Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 3–8.
Pérez-Milans, M. 2013. Urban Schools and English Language Education in Late Modern China: A Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography [Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism]. London: Routledge.
QS website. Top Universities. <[URL]>
Rampton, B. 2006. Language in Late-Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP.
Singapore Management University website. Student Statistics. <[URL]>
Stroud, C. & Wee L. 2010. Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (eds), 181–204. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Swartz, D. 2002. The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Occupation, Participation and Health 22 (1): 61S–69S.
Tan, C. 2008. Tensions in an ability-driven education. In Thinking Dchools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 7–18. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tan, J. 2008. Whither National Education? In Thinking Schools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 72–86. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tan, K. P. 2008. Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review 29 (1): 7–27.
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. 2005. Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1–26. Cambridge: CUP.
Thompson, J. 1991. Editor’s introduction. In Language and Symbolic Power, P. Bourdieu, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vertovec, S. 2001. Transnational social formations: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Working Paper 01–16. Transnational Communities Programme, Oxford University. <[URL]>
Warde, A. 2004. Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. Discussion Paper no 65. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester. <[URL]>
Yang, P. 2016a. ‘Eliteness’ in Chinese Schooling: Towards an ethnographic approach. In Elite Education: International Perspectives, C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (eds), 135–47. New York NY: Routledge.
Yang, P. 2016b. International Mobility and Educational Desire: Chinese Foreign Talent Students in Singapore. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yeoh, B. 2007. Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. <[URL]>
Yeoh, B. & Yap, N. 2008. ‘Gateway Singapore’: Immigration policies, differential (non)incorporation and identity politics. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 177–202. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Lu, Luke
2021.
Disaffiliation amongst academically elite students in Singapore: the role of a non-standard variety of English.
International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021:271
► pp. 139 ff.
Lu, Luke
2022.
Applying a ‘glonacal’ framework: the education choices of academically elite students in Singapore in relation to state scholarships.
Globalisation, Societies and Education 20:3
► pp. 324 ff.
Lu, Luke
2023.
The (In)significance of Race in Singapore’s Immigration Context: Accounts of Self-Differentiation by Academically Elite Students.
Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22:1
► pp. 18 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.