Article published In:
Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 141172
References (59)
Archer, M. 2010. Routine, reflexivity and realism. Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baynham, M. 2011. Stance, positioning and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 401: 63–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Narrative analysis. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (eds), 69–84. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 1992. The Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benton-Short, L. & Price, M. 2008. Introduction. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 1–22. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13 (2): 1–82.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–58. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Chia, S. & Toh, K. 2012. Scrapping PSLE not the solution: Lawrence Wong”. The Straits Times, September 12.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. 2010. Bauman, Beck, Giddens and our understanding of politics in late modernity. Journal of Power 3 (2): 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], R. Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. 1995. Language and Communicative Practices. New York NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
2005. Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 341: 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. 1999. Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, A. Jaffe (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S. 2011. Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Presented at the iMean conference, 15 April 2011. The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. <[URL]>
Koh, A. 2010. Tactical Globalisation: Learning from the Singapore Experiment. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1997. Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L. 2012. Meritocracy, elitism and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, L. Forthcoming. ‘Designer immigrant students’ in Singapore: Challenges for linguistic human rights in a globalizing world. In Engaging Superdiversity, K. Arnaut, M. Karrebæk & M. Spotti (eds). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ministry of Education. 2012. MOE removes Secondary School Banding and revamps school awards. Press release. <[URL]>
. 2013. Direct School Admission (DSA) – Method and review processes. Parliamentary reply. <[URL]>
. 2015. Choosing your secondary schools for admission to Secondary One in 2016. Singapore: Ministry of Education. <[URL]>
. 2016. Changes to PSLE scoring and Secondary One posting. Press release. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website a. Secondary Education. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website b. Integrated programme. <[URL]>
Ministry of Education website c. Every school a good school. <[URL]>
National University of Singapore website. Students and graduate statistics. <[URL]>
Ng, J. Y. 2013 August 19. PSLE scores to be scrapped, students to be given grades. <[URL]>
Ng, P. T. 2013. The global war for talent: Responses and challenges in the Singapore Higher Education system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (3): 280–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, G. 2013. ‘It is home but it is not home’: Habitus, field and the migrant. Journal of Sociology 49 (2–3): 341–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. & Capps, L. 2002. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M. 2013. Urban Schools and English Language Education in Late Modern China: A Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography [Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism]. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
QS website. Top Universities. <[URL]>
Rampton, B. 2006. Language in Late-Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singapore Management University website. Student Statistics. <[URL]>
Stroud, C. & Wee L. 2010. Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (eds), 181–204. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swartz, D. 2002. The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Occupation, Participation and Health 22 (1): 61S–69S. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, C. 2008. Tensions in an ability-driven education. In Thinking Dchools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 7–18. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, J. 2008. Whither National Education? In Thinking Schools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 72–86. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, K. P. 2008. Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review 29 (1): 7–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. 2005. Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1–26. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1991. Editor’s introduction. In Language and Symbolic Power, P. Bourdieu, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. 2001. Transnational social formations: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Working Paper 01–16. Transnational Communities Programme, Oxford University. <[URL]>
Warde, A. 2004. Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. Discussion Paper no 65. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester. <[URL]>
Yang, P. 2016a. ‘Eliteness’ in Chinese Schooling: Towards an ethnographic approach. In Elite Education: International Perspectives, C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (eds), 135–47. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016b. International Mobility and Educational Desire: Chinese Foreign Talent Students in Singapore. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeoh, B. 2007. Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. <[URL]>
Yeoh, B. & Yap, N. 2008. ‘Gateway Singapore’: Immigration policies, differential (non)incorporation and identity politics. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 177–202. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lu, Luke
2021. Disaffiliation amongst academically elite students in Singapore: the role of a non-standard variety of English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021:271  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Luke
2022. Applying a ‘glonacal’ framework: the education choices of academically elite students in Singapore in relation to state scholarships. Globalisation, Societies and Education 20:3  pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Luke
2023. The (In)significance of Race in Singapore’s Immigration Context: Accounts of Self-Differentiation by Academically Elite Students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22:1  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.