Article published in:
Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 141172


Academically elite students in Singapore


Archer, M.
2010Routine, reflexivity and realism. Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z.
2000Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baynham, M.
2011Stance, positioning and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 40: 63–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Narrative analysis. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (eds), 69–84. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, U.
1992The Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benton-Short, L. & Price, M.
2008Introduction. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 1–22. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B.
2011Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13 (2): 1–82.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1986The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–58. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Chia, S. & Toh, K.
2012Scrapping PSLE not the solution: Lawrence Wong”. The Straits Times, September 12.Google Scholar
Dawson, M.
2010Bauman, Beck, Giddens and our understanding of politics in late modernity. Journal of Power 3 (2): 189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.
2007The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], R. Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.
2005An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A.
1990The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 170 ]
1991Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D.
1972Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S.
1996Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hanks, W.
1995Language and Communicative Practices. New York NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
2005Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 67–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.
1999Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, A. Jaffe (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S.
2011Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Presented at the iMean conference, 15 April 2011. The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. http://​www​.academia​.edu​/1037087​/Stance​_in​_context​_Affect​_alignment​_and​_investment​_in​_the​_analysis​_of​_stancetaking
Koh, A.
2010Tactical Globalisation: Learning from the Singapore Experiment. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
1997Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 395–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, L.
2012Meritocracy, elitism and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L.
Forthcoming. ‘Designer immigrant students’ in Singapore: Challenges for linguistic human rights in a globalizing world. In Engaging Superdiversity, K. Arnaut, M. Karrebæk & M. Spotti eds Bristol Multilingual Matters
Ministry of Education
2015Choosing your secondary schools for admission to Secondary One in 2016. Singapore: Ministry of Education. https://​www​.moe​.gov​.sg​/admissions​/secondary​-one​-posting​-exercise​/information​-booklet
Ministry of Education website a
National University of Singapore website
Ng, J. Y.
[ p. 171 ]
Ng, P. T.
2013The global war for talent: Responses and challenges in the Singapore Higher Education system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (3): 280–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noble, G.
2013‘It is home but it is not home’: Habitus, field and the migrant. Journal of Sociology 49 (2–3): 341–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. & Capps, L.
2002Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, A.
2006Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 3–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M.
2013Urban Schools and English Language Education in Late Modern China: A Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography [Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rampton, B.
2006Language in Late-Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. & Wee L.
2010Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (eds), 181–204. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, D.
2002The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Occupation, Participation and Health 22 (1): 61S–69S. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C.
2008Tensions in an ability-driven education. In Thinking Dchools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 7–18. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, J.
2008Whither National Education? In Thinking Schools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 72–86. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, K. P.
2008Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review 29 (1): 7–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2005Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1–26. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.
1991Editor’s introduction. In Language and Symbolic Power, P. Bourdieu, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S.
2001Transnational social formations: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Working Paper 01–16. Transnational Communities Programme, Oxford University. http://​www​.transcomm​.ox​.ac​.uk​/working%20papers​/Vertovec2​.pdf
Warde, A.
2004Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. Discussion Paper no 65. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester. https://​www​.researchgate​.net​/publication​/238096928​_Practice​_and​_Field​_Revising​_Bourdieusian​_Concepts
Yang, P.
2016a‘Eliteness’ in Chinese Schooling: Towards an ethnographic approach. In Elite Education: International Perspectives, C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (eds), 135–47. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016bInternational Mobility and Educational Desire: Chinese Foreign Talent Students in Singapore. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 172 ]
Yeoh, B.
2007Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. http://​www​.migrationinformation​.org​/article​/singapore​-hungry​-foreign​-workers​-all​-skill​-levels
Yeoh, B. & Yap, N.
2008‘Gateway Singapore’: Immigration policies, differential (non)incorporation and identity politics. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 177–202. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lu, Luke
2020. The (In)significance of Race in Singapore’s Immigration Context: Accounts of Self-Differentiation by Academically Elite Students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lu, Luke
2021. Applying a ‘glonacal’ framework: the education choices of academically elite students in Singapore in relation to state scholarships. Globalisation, Societies and Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.