Cover not available
Article published In:
Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 141–172

Academically elite students in Singapore

A collective moral stance toward aspirations and trajectories

| Centre for Language, Discourse and Communication, King's College London

This paper draws on a Linguistic Ethnography (Blommaert & Rampton 2011) of a group of academically elite students in Singapore. The group comprises locals born in Singapore, as well as immigrants from China and Vietnam. My informants all attended a top-ranked secondary school in Singapore. I present data from interviews and a focus group discussion with them about their aspirations and educational pathways. These academically elite students describe a conventional aspiration amongst their peers involving transnational mobility and attending top-ranked universities in the US and UK. My informants discursively construct this aspiration as preferred, with a sense that they are expected to conform to such a trajectory. I argue that their consistent orientation toward the ideal trajectory and production of discourse about it denotes a collective moral stance (Ochs & Capps 2002), and hence a disposition embedded in a social field (Hanks 2005). In response to Archer’s (2012) theorisations that dominant modes of reflexivity have changed, my informants’ relatively stable orientations and ways of acting demonstrate how Bourdieu’s notion of habitus continues to be relevant in late-modernity. In practical terms, this study also shows a clear link between elite schools, and the aspirations and resultant trajectories of individuals. This has direct implications for policy-makers in Singapore where the Ministry of Education has been attempting to curb elitism in the education system.

Keywords: trajectories, stance, elite students, habitus, aspirations
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 7 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.06lu
References (59)
Archer, M.
2010 Routine, reflexivity and realism. Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z.
2000 Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baynham, M.
2011 Stance, positioning and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 401: 63–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Narrative analysis. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (eds), 69–84. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, U.
1992 The Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benton-Short, L. & Price, M.
2008 Introduction. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 1–22. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B.
2011 Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13 (2): 1–82.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1986 The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–58. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Chia, S. & Toh, K.
2012 Scrapping PSLE not the solution: Lawrence Wong”. The Straits Times, September 12.Google Scholar
Dawson, M.
2010 Bauman, Beck, Giddens and our understanding of politics in late modernity. Journal of Power 3 (2): 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.
2007 The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], R. Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.
2005 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A.
1990 The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1991 Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.
1982 Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D.
1972 Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S.
1996 Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hanks, W.
1995 Language and Communicative Practices. New York NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
2005 Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 341: 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.
1999 Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, A. Jaffe (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S.
2011 Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Presented at the iMean conference, 15 April 2011. The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. [URL]
Koh, A.
2010 Tactical Globalisation: Learning from the Singapore Experiment. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
1997 Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L.
2012 Meritocracy, elitism and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, L.
Forthcoming. ‘Designer immigrant students’ in Singapore: Challenges for linguistic human rights in a globalizing world. In Engaging Superdiversity, K. Arnaut, M. Karrebæk & M. Spotti eds Bristol Multilingual Matters
Ministry of Education
2012 MOE removes Secondary School Banding and revamps school awards. Press release. [URL]
2013 Direct School Admission (DSA) – Method and review processes. Parliamentary reply. [URL]
2015 Choosing your secondary schools for admission to Secondary One in 2016. Singapore: Ministry of Education. [URL]
2016 Changes to PSLE scoring and Secondary One posting. Press release. [URL]
Ministry of Education website a
Secondary Education. [URL]
Ministry of Education website b
Integrated programme. [URL]
Ministry of Education website c
Every school a good school. [URL]
National University of Singapore website
Students and graduate statistics. [URL]
Ng, J. Y.
2013 August 19. PSLE scores to be scrapped, students to be given grades. [URL]
Ng, P. T.
2013 The global war for talent: Responses and challenges in the Singapore Higher Education system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (3): 280–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, G.
2013 ‘It is home but it is not home’: Habitus, field and the migrant. Journal of Sociology 49 (2–3): 341–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. & Capps, L.
2002 Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, A.
2006 Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M.
2013 Urban Schools and English Language Education in Late Modern China: A Critical Sociolinguistic Ethnography [Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism]. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
QS website
Top Universities. [URL]
Rampton, B.
2006 Language in Late-Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singapore Management University website
Student Statistics. [URL]
Stroud, C. & Wee L.
2010 Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (eds), 181–204. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swartz, D.
2002 The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Occupation, Participation and Health 22 (1): 61S–69S. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, C.
2008 Tensions in an ability-driven education. In Thinking Dchools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 7–18. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, J.
2008 Whither National Education? In Thinking Schools, Learning Nation, J. Tan & P. T. Ng (eds), 72–86. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tan, K. P.
2008 Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review 29 (1): 7–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2005 Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1–26. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.
1991 Editor’s introduction. In Language and Symbolic Power, P. Bourdieu, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S.
2001 Transnational social formations: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Working Paper 01–16. Transnational Communities Programme, Oxford University. [URL]
Warde, A.
2004 Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. Discussion Paper no 65. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester. [URL]
Yang, P.
2016a ‘Eliteness’ in Chinese Schooling: Towards an ethnographic approach. In Elite Education: International Perspectives, C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (eds), 135–47. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016b International Mobility and Educational Desire: Chinese Foreign Talent Students in Singapore. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeoh, B.
2007 Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. [URL]
Yeoh, B. & Yap, N.
2008 ‘Gateway Singapore’: Immigration policies, differential (non)incorporation and identity politics. In Migrants to the Metropolis: The Rise of Immigrant Gateway Cities, M. Price & L. Benton-Short (eds), 177–202. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Lu, Luke
2021. Disaffiliation amongst academically elite students in Singapore: the role of a non-standard variety of English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021:271 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Luke
2022. Applying a ‘glonacal’ framework: the education choices of academically elite students in Singapore in relation to state scholarships. Globalisation, Societies and Education 20:3 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Luke
2023. The (In)significance of Race in Singapore’s Immigration Context: Accounts of Self-Differentiation by Academically Elite Students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22:1 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.