Chapter 4
Weaving oneself into others
Coordination in conversational systems
We review a range of findings that show how eye movements (and other body movements) exhibit correlated behavior across two or more people during natural interactions. We then synthesize these different results into a more general account of how people’s cognitive, sensory and motor systems become coordinated with one another during natural dialogue. We argue that treating conversants as parts of one integrated system is a useful explanatory strategy for understanding interaction. We end by describing explicit quantitative conditions for seeking “systemhood” in human interaction. These conditions motivate future research questions on social eye movements and other behaviors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: The eyes of social systems
- 2.Collecting samples from the temporal dynamics of a cognitive process
- 2.1Devise a cyclic motor behavior
- 2.2A series of experimental trials as dynamics
- 2.3Dense-sampling methods
- 3.Eyetracking as a dense-sampling measure of human interaction
- 3.1Human interaction as systemic coupling
- 4.Concluding discussion: Criteria for systemhood
- 4.1Implications for research: Weak and strong conditions for systemhood
- 4.2Conclusion
-
References
References
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K.
(
2001)
The bounds of cognition.
Philosophical psychology, 14(1), 43–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(
1998)
Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models.
Journal of memory and language, 38(4), 419–439.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y.
(
1999)
Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference.
Cognition, 73(3), 247–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, J. R.
(
1996)
ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition.
American Psychologist, 51(4), 355.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ashby, W. R.
(
1956)
An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V.
(
2011)
Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A.
(
1991)
Connectionism and the Mind. Backwell, Cambridge, MA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A.
(
2010)
Dynamic mechanistic explanation: Computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(3), 321–333.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beer, R. D., & Williams, P. L.
(
2015)
Information processing and dynamics in minimally cognitive agents.
Cognitive science, 39(1), 1–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brennan, S. E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. K.
(
2010)
Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding.
Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 301–344.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown-Schmidt, S., Campana, E., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(
2005)
Real-time reference resolution by naïve participants during a task-based unscripted conversation. In
J. Trueswell &
M. Tanenhaus (Eds.),
World Situated Language Use: Psycholinguistic, Linguistic and Computational Perspectives on Bridging the Product and Action Traditions, (pp.153–171) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown-Schmidt, S., Yoon, S. O., & Ryskin, R. A.
(
2015)
People as contexts in conversation.
Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 62, 59–99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(
2008)
Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach.
Cognitive Science, 32(4), 643–684.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chemero, A.
(
2011)
Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. T.
(
2008)
Autonomy and hypersets.
Biosystems,91(2), 320–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
(
1986)
Referring as a collaborative process.
Cognition, 22(1), 1–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coupland, N.
(
1985)
‘Hark, hark, the lark’: social motivations for phonological style-shifting.
Language & Communication, 5(3), 153–171.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crosby, J. R., Monin, B. & Richardson, D. C.
(
2008)
Where Do We Look During Potentially Offensive Behavior? Psychological Science, 19 (3), 226–228.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutchfield, J. P.
(
1994)
The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction.
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 75(1), 11–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, R., Kirkham, N. Z. & Richardson, D. C.
(
2011)
The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention.
Frontiers in Psychology, 2.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dotov, D. G., Nie, L., & Chemero, A.
(
2010)
A demonstration of the transition from ready-to-hand to unready-to-hand.
PLoS One, 5(3), e9433.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(
1995)
Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.
Journal of psycholinguistic research, 24(6), 409–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, S.
(
2008)
On the nature of minds, or: truth and consequences.
Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20(3), 181–196.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliasmith, C.
(
1996)
The third contender: A critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition.
Philosophical Psychology, 9(4), 441–463.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliasmith, C.
(
2012)
The complex systems approach: rhetoric or revolution.
Topics in cognitive science, 4(1), 72–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, N. J.
(
2013)
Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farmer, T. A., Cargill, S. A., Hindy, N. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J.
(
2007)
Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing.
Cognitive Science, 31(5), 889–909.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C.
(
1986)
The independence of syntactic processing.
Journal of memory and language, 25(3), 348–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitneva, S. A. & Spivey, M. J.
(
2005)
Context and language processing: The effect of authorship. In
J. Trueswell &
M. Tanenhaus (Eds.),
World Situated Language Use: Psycholinguistic, Linguistic and Computational Perspectives on Bridging the Product and Action Traditions, (pp.317–328) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, L.
(
1995)
Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 437–468.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K.
(
2015)
Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, Interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance.
Cognitive Science, 40, 145–171.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Tylén, K.
(
2012)
Coming to terms quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.
Psychological Science, 23(8), 931–939.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J. S., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K.
(
2016)
A Heart for Interaction: Shared Physiological Dynamics and Behavioral Coordination in a Collective, Creative Construction Task.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 42(9), 1297–1310.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K.
(
2014)
Dialog as interpersonal synergy.
New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gallagher, S., & Crisafi, A.
(
2009)
Mental institutions.
Topoi, 28(1), 45–51.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilden, D. L.
(
2001)
Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise.
Psychological review, 108(1), 33–56.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gow, D. W. & Olson, B. B.
(
2015):
Sentential influences on acoustic- phonetic processing: a Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data,
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haken, H.
(
1977)
Synergetics. Physics Bulletin
, 28(9), 412.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haken, H., Kelso, J. S., & Bunz, H.
(
1985)
A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.
Biological cybernetics, 51(5), 347–356.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R.
(
2004)
Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision.
science, 303(5664), 1634-1640.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hove, M. J., & Keller, P. E.
(
2015)
Impaired movement timing in neurological disorders: rehabilitation and treatment strategies.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 111–117.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L.
(
2009)
It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation.
Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hove, M. J., Spivey, M. J., & Krumhansl, C. L.
(
2010)
Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1525–1534.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, E.
(
1995)
Cognition in the Wild. MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, E.
(
1995)
How a cockpit remembers its speeds.
Cognitive science,19(3), 265–288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeger, T. F.
(
2010)
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density.
Cognitive psychology, 61(1), 23–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, J. S., & Knoblich, G.
(
2004)
Spatial perception and control.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 54–59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kello, C. T., Anderson, G. G., Holden, J. G., & Van Orden, G. C.
(
2008)
The pervasiveness of 1/f scaling in speech reflects the metastable basis of cognition.
Cognitive Science, 32(7), 1217–1231.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., & Van Orden, G. C.
(
2010)
Scaling laws in cognitive sciences.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 223–232.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelso, J. A. S.
(
1984)
Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination.
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 246(6), R1000–R1004.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelso, J. A. S.
(
1997)
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelso, J. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A.
(
1984)
Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(6), 812.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G.
(
2010)
Voluntary behavior in cognitive and motor tasks.
Mind and Matter, 8(1), 19–43.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S.
(
2003)
Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006–1016.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W.
(
2006)
The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking.
Cognitive Science, 30(3), 481–529.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjødt, U., Jegindø, E. M., Wallot, S., Van Orden, G., & Roepstorff, A.
(
2011)
Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8514–8519.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J. D.
(
2012)
Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6
,
Article 266.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L.
(
2003)
Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport.
Psychological science, 14(4), 334–339.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Latash, M. L., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G.
(
2002)
Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability.
Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 30(1), 26–31.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P.
(
2012)
Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized.
Cognitive Science,36(8), 1404–1426.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A.
(
2013)
Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419–426.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, M.
(
2009)
Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J. K., & Wallot, S.
(
2016)
Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task.
Physiology & Behavior, 156, 24–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neisser, U.
(
1976)
Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco, California: W. H. Freeman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newell, A.
(
1980)
Physical symbol systems*.
Cognitive science, 4(2), 135–183.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noë, A.
(
2009)
Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paxton, A., & Dale, R.
(
2013)
Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2092–2102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paxton, A., & Dale, R.
(
2013a)
Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation.
Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329–343.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paxton, A., & Dale, R.
(
2013b)
Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2092–2102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reali, F., Spivey, M. J., Tyler, M. J., & Terranova, J.
(
2006)
Inefficient conjunction search made efficient by concurrent spoken delivery of target identity.
Perception & psychophysics, 68(6), 959–974.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Repp, B. H.
(
2005)
Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature.
Psychonomic bulletin & review, 12(6), 969–992.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R.
(
2005)
Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.
Cognitive science, 29(6), 1045–1060.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R. & Kirkham, N.
(
2007)
The art of conversation is coordination: common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue.
Psychological Science, 18, 407–413.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, D. C., Street, C. N. H., Tan, J. Y. M., Kirkham, N. Z., Hoover, M. A., & Ghane Cavanaugh, A.
(
2012).
Joint perception: gaze and social context.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R. & Marsh, K.
(
2014)
Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: theory, modeling and analysis. In
H. T. Reis &
C. M. Judd (Eds.),
Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (pp.253–282). Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C.
(
2005)
Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 62–79.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C.
(
2011)
Interpersonal synergies.
Frontiers in psychology, 2, 38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A.
(
2011)
Eyes wide shut: implied social presence, eye tracking and attention.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 291–296.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Risko, E. F., Richardson, D. C., & Kingstone, A.
(
2016)
Breaking the Fourth Wall of Cognitive Science Real-World Social Attention and the Dual Function of Gaze.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 70–74.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rupert, R. D.
(
2011)
Cognitive systems and the supersized mind.
Philosophical Studies, 152(3), 427–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T.
(
1990)
Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people.
Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 16(2), 227–247.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W.
(
2003)
Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own?.
Cognition, 88(3), B11–B21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E.
(
2006)
Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859–870.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shenhar, A.
(
1990)
On system properties and systemhood.
International Journal Of General System, 18(2), 167–174.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A.
(
2007)
Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 201.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A.
(
2003)
Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon, H. A.
(
1992)
What is an “explanation” of behavior?.
Psychological Science, 3(3), 150–161.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey-Knowlton, M. J.
(
1996)
Integration of visual and linguistic information: Human data and model simulations. Ph.D. Dissertation, U. Rochester, NY.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M.
(
2008)
The continuity of mind. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. J.
(
2012)
The spatial intersection of minds.
Cognitive Processing, 13, 343–346.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. J.
(
2016)
Semantics influences speech perception: commentary on Gow and Olson (2015).
Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(7), 856-859.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strogatz, S.
(
2003)
Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York, NY: Hyperion.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taleb, N. N.
(
2012)
Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder (Vol. 3). Random House Incorporated.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C.
(
1995)
Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.
Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tollefsen, D. P.
(
2006)
From extended mind to collective mind.
Cognitive systems research, 7(2), 140–150.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tollefsen, D. & Dale, R.
(
2012)
Naturalizing joint action: a process-based approach.
Philosophical Psychology, 25, 385–407.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Gelder, T.
(
1998)
The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.
Behavioral and brain sciences, 21(05), 615–628.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Orden, G. C., & Holden, J. G.
(
2002)
Intentional contents and self-control.
Ecological Psychology, 14(1–2), 87–109.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T.
(
2003)
Self-organization of cognitive performance.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Orden, G., & Stephen, D. G.
(
2012)
Is cognitive science usefully cast as complexity science?.
Topics in cognitive science, 4(1), 3–6.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wegner, D. M.
(
1987)
Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In
Theories of group behavior (pp.185–208). Springer New York.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiener, N.
(
1961)
Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Vol. 25). MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Dale, Rick, Anne S. Warlaumont & Kerri L. Johnson
2022.
The fundamental importance of method to theory.
Nature Reviews Psychology 2:1
► pp. 55 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Spivey, Michael J.
2023.
Cognitive Science Progresses Toward Interactive Frameworks.
Topics in Cognitive Science 15:2
► pp. 219 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.