Chapter 2
The relations of demonstration and pantomime to causal reasoning and event cognition
This article deals with the role of showing in the evolution of human communication and how it has developed into
telling. When a communicator is showing, she is performing, not just doing. Demonstration is a combination of doing and
showing, while pantomime is only showing. I make a distinction between pantomime used for teaching and pantomime for
communication and argue that this is central for the transition from showing to telling. Telling involves describing an event
or a series of events. The evolutionary question then becomes: Which selective forces made hominins extend their communication
from doing to showing and then to telling? My answer is that showing and, to a larger degree, telling require advanced forms
of causal cognition and event representation that are not found in other species. I analyze how event cognition is relevant
for demonstration and pantomime and how this type of cognition influences the structure of language.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: From doing to showing to telling
- 2.Causal cognition
- 2.1Non-human primate reasoning about causes
- 2.2Human reasoning about forces
- 3.Event cognition
- 3.1A cognitive model of events
- 3.2Event cognition and planning
- 4.Demonstration and two kinds of pantomime
- 4.1Characteristics of demonstration
- 4.2Characteristics of pantomime
- 4.3Theory of mind and communicative intentions
- 4.4Pantomime for communication
- 5.The role of event cognition in pantomime for communication
- 6.Influence on the structure of language
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (81)
Abramova, E.
(
2018)
The
role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive bases and an
alternative.
Journal of Language
Evolution, 3(1), 26–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbib, M. A.
(
2012)
How
the brain got language: The mirror system
hypothesis (Vol. 16). Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbib, M. A.
(
2018)
In
support of the role of pantomime in language evolution.
Journal of Language
Evolution, 3(1), 41–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boesch, C., Bombjaková, D., Boyette, A., & Meier, A.
(
2017)
Technical
intelligence and culture: Nut cracking in humans and chimpanzees.
American Journal of
Physical
Anthropology, 163(2), 339–355.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M.
(
1998)
Chimpanzee
and human cultures.
Current
Anthropology, 39(5), 591–614.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinck, I.
(
2004)
The
pragmatics of imperative and declarative pointing.
Cogitive
Science Quarterly, 3(4), 429–446.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, S., Mittermaier, E., Kher, T., & Arnold, P.
(
2019)
How
pantomime works: Implications for theories of language origin.
Frontiers in
Communication, 4, 9.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calvin, W. H., & Bickerton, D.
(
2000)
Lingua
ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain. MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R.
(
1990)
Attending
to behaviour versus attending to knowledge: Examining monkeys’ attribution of mental
states.
Animal
Behaviour, 40(4), 742–753.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, E. V.
(
1992)
Conventionality
and contrast: Pragmatic principles with lexical consequences.
Lehrer and Kittay,
1992a, 171–188.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H.
(
1992)
Arenas
of language use. University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clay, Z., Pople, S., Hood, B., & Kita, S.
(
2014)
Young
children make their gestural communication systems more language-like: Segmentation and linearization of semantic
elements in motion events.
Psychological
Science, 25(8), 1518–1525.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G.
(
2009)
Natural
pedagogy.
Trends in cognitive
sciences, 13(4), 148–153.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J.
(
2006)
The
power of simulation: imagining one’s own and other’s behavior.
Brain
Research, 1079(1), 4–14.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donald, M.
(
1991)
Origins
of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D.
(
1991)
Thematic
proto-roles and argument
selection.
Language, 67(3), 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
1995)
Cued
and detached representations in animal cognition.
Behavioural
Processes, 35(1–3), 263–273.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
How
homo became sapiens: On the evolution of thinking; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK
2003.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2007)
Evolutionary
and developmental aspects of intersubjectivity. In
H. Liljenström, &
P. Århem (Eds.),
Consciousness
transitions (pp. 281–305). Elsevier Science BV.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2010)
What
are the benefits of broad horizons? In
The Benefit of Broad
Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social
Science (pp. xiii–xx). Brill Academic Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2012)
The
cognitive and communicative demands of cooperation. In
J. van Eijck, &
R. Verbrugge (Eds.),
Games,
actions and social
software (pp. 164–183). Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2014)
The
geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2017)
Demonstration
and pantomime in the evolution of teaching.
Frontiers in
Psychology, 8, 415.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2020)
From
pantomime to
protolanguage.
Paradigmi, 38(2), 251–268.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P.
(
2021)
Causal
reasoning and event cognition as evolutionary determinants of language
structure.
Entropy, 23(7), 843.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., & Högberg, A.
(
2017)
The
archaeology of teaching and the evolution of Homo docens.
Current
Anthropology, 58(2), 188–208.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., Högberg, A.
(
2021)
Evolution
of intentional teaching. In
N. Gontier,
A. Lock &
C. Sinha (Eds.),
The
Oxford Handbook of Human
Symbolic Evolution. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., Jost, J., & Warglien, M.
(
2018)
From
actions to effects: Three constraints on event mappings.
Frontiers in
Psychology, 1391.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., & Lombard, M.
(
2018)
Causal
cognition, force dynamics and early hunting technologies.
Frontiers in
Psychology, 9, 87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., & M. Lombard
(
2021)
‘The
Evolution of Human Causal Cognition, In
T. Wynn,
K. A. Overmann, &
F. L. Coolidge (Eds),
The
Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Archaeology.(pp.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gärdenfors, P., & Warglien, M.
(
2012)
Using
conceptual spaces to model actions and events.
Journal of
Semantics, 29(4), 487–519.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gelman, S. A., & Roberts, S. O.
(
2017)
How
language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories.
Proceedings of the National
Academy of
Sciences, 114(30), 7900–7907.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, K. R.
(
2013)
Talking
about apes, birds, bees, and other living creatures: Language evolution in the light of comparative animal
behaviour.
The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Evidence and
Inference, 17, 204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez, J. C.
(
2007)
Requesting
gestures in captive monkeys.
Gestural Communication in Nonhuman and Human
Primates, 10, 83.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, S. A., Gelman, S. A., & Clarke, J.
(
2016)
Generics
license 30-month-olds’ inferences about the atypical properties of novel
kinds.
Developmental
Psychology, 52(9), 1353.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grush, R.
(
1997)
The
architecture of representation.
Philosophical
Psychology, 10(1), 5–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, J.
(
2018)
Ideophones
and the Evolution of
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hannah, A. C., & McGrew, W. C.
(
1987)
Chimpanzees
using stones to crack open oil palm nuts in
Liberia.
Primates, 28(1), 31–46.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heyes, C.
(
2021)
Imitation
and culture: What gives? Mind &
Language, 1–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M.
(
1999)
Creation
through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in
Nicaragua.
Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and
development, 179–237.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leslie, A. M.
(
1995)
A
theory of agency. In
D. Sperber,
D. Premack &
J. A. Premack (Eds.),
Causal
Cognition: A Multidisciplinary
Debate (pp. 121–141). Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leslie, A. M.
(
1987)
Pretense
and representation: The origins of ”theory of mind.”.
Psychological
review, 94(4), 412.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S.
(
1987)
Do
six-month-old infants perceive
causality? Cognition, 25(3), 265–288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R.
(
2005)
Argument
realization. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liebenberg L.
(
1990)
The
art of tracking: The origin of science. David Philip Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombard, M., & Gärdenfors, P.
(
2017)
Tracking
the evolution of causal cognition in humans.
Journal of Anthropological
Sciences 95, 1–18.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lombard, M., & Gärdenfors, P.
(
2021)
Causal
cognition and theory of mind in evolutionary cognitive archaeology.
Biological
Theory, 1–19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyn, H., Russell, J. L., Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., Boysen, S. T., Schaeffer, J. A., & Hopkins, W. D.
(
2014)
Apes
communicate about absent and displaced objects: methodology matters.
Animal
Cognition, 17(1), 85–94.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michotte, A.
(
1963)
The
Perception of Causality. Methuen
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, B. J., & Abwe, E. E.
(
2006)
Chimpanzees
use stone hammers in Cameroon.
Current
Biology, 16(16), R632–R633.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nielsen, M.
(
2012)
Imitation,
pretend play, and childhood: Essential elements in the evolution of human
culture? Journal of Comparative
Psychology, 126(2), 170.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pika, S., & Mitani, J.
(
2006)
Referential
gestural communication in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Current
Biology, 16(6), R191–R192.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pleyer, M., Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P.
(
2021)
Shared
evolutionary and developmental foundations of pretence and pantomime, abstract
for Protolang 7, Düsseldorf.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Povinelli, D. J.
(
2000)
Folk
physics for apes: The chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G.
(
1978)
Does
the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?.
Behavioral and brain
sciences, 1(4), 515–526.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quinto-Pozos, D.
(
2007)
Can
constructed action be considered
obligatory? Lingua, 117(7), 1285–1314.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M.
(
2014)
Event
cognition. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rissman, L., & Majid, A.
(
2019)
Thematic
roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 26(6), 1850–1869.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runesson, S.
(
1994)
Perception
of biological motion: The KSD-principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal
approach. In
G. Jansson,
S. S. Bergström &
W. Epstein (Eds.),
Perceiving
Events and
Objects (pp. 383–405). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russon, A., & Andrews, K.
(
2011)
Orangutan
pantomime: elaborating the message.
Biology
Letters, 7(4), 627–630.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabbagh, M. A., & Henderson, A. M.
(
2007)
How
an appreciation of conventionality shapes early word learning.
New Directions for Child
and Adolescent
Development, 2007(115), 25–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
(
2004)
Children
creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in
Nicaragua.
Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaw-Williams, K.
(
2014)
The
social trackways theory of the evolution of human cognition.
Biological
Theory, 9(1), 16–26.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stuart-Fox, M.
(
2015)
The
origins of causal cognition in early hominins.
Biology &
Philosophy, 30(2), 247–266.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L.
(
2006)
Recombinance
in the evolution of language. In
A. Cangelosi,
A. D. M. Smith, &
K. Smith (Eds.),
The
evolution of language: Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference (pp. 449–451). World Scientific Publishing Company.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanner, J. E., & Byrne, R. W.
(
1996)
Representation
of action through iconic gesture in a captive lowland gorilla.
Current
Anthropology, 37(1), 162–173.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M.
(
1999)
The
cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M.
(
2014)
A
natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U.
(
2007)
A
new look at infant pointing.
Child
Development, 78(3), 705–722.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warglien, M., Gärdenfors, P., & Westera, M.
(
2012)
Event
structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs.
Theoretical
Linguistics, 38(3–4), 159–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winter, S.
(
1998)
Expectations
and linguistic meaning. Lund University Cognitive Science 73.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P.
(
2007)
Representing
causation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 136(1), 82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P.
(
2008)
Dynamics
and the perception of causal events. In
S. Thomas &
J. Zacks. (Eds.),
Understanding
events: How humans see, represent, and act on
events (pp. 555–587). Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P.
(
2012)
Representing
verbs with force vectors.
Theoretical
Linguistics, 38, 237–248.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P., Barbey, A. K., & Hausknecht, M.
(
2010)
For
want of a nail: How absences cause events.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 139(2), 191.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P., & Shepard, J.
(
2013)
Causation,
touch, and the perception of force. In
Psychology of learning
and
motivation (Vol. 58, pp. 167–202). Academic Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P.; Thorstad, R.
(
2017)
Force
dynamics. In
M. R. Waldmann (Ed.),
The
Oxford handbook of causal
reasoning (pp. 147–167). Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zlatev, J., Persson, T., Gärdenfors, P.
(
2005)
Bodily
mimesis as ‘the missing link’ in human cognitive evolution, Lund: Lund University
Cognitive Studies 121.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zlatev, J., Żywiczyński, P., & Wacewicz, S.
(
2020)
Pantomime
as the original human-specific communicative system.
Journal of Language
Evolution, 5(2), 156–174.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuberbühler, K.
(
2013)
Acquired
mirroring and intentional communication in primates.
Language and
Cognition, 5(2–3), 133–143.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Żywiczyński, P., Wacewicz, S., & Sibierska, M.
(
2018)
Defining
pantomime for language evolution
research.
Topoi, 37(2), 307–318.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Mineiro, Ana & Mara Moita
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Marek Placiński, Marta Sibierska, Monika Boruta-Żywiczyńska, Sławomir Wacewicz, Michał Meina & Peter Gärdenfors
2024.
Praxis, demonstration and pantomime: a motion capture investigation of differences in action performances.
Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.