Chapter 8
Symbolic distancing in three-year-old children’s object-use pantomime
Children’s early pantomime of how to use objects is thought to demonstrate “symbolic distancing,” ostensibly
providing an opportunity to observe the development of symbolic reference between the ages of three- and six-years. This
chapter argues, in contrast, that the modes of representation used by three-year-olds may be better explained by item, task,
and communicative factors revealing children’s functional knowledge of objects and social knowledge of communicative
conventions rather than symbolic development. Detailed analysis of the children’s manual mode of representation in conjunction
with their speech challenges assumptions about which forms are viewed as more or less pantomimic. Interpretation of iconicity
may be a function of human adult convention; we discuss the implications for our understanding of the role of iconic gestures
depicting object-use in communicative situations.
Article outline
- Symbolic distancing in three-year-old children’s pantomime
- “Pantomiming” how to use an object
- Is this pantomime?
- Symbol development and symbolic distancing
- Symbolic status of pantomime forms
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Coding
- Results
- Gesture type by child, cue and speech
- Gesture type by object
- Discussion
- Pantomime? The effects of cue and speech
- Mode of representation and primary vs. secondary iconicity
- Alternatives to symbolic distancing
- Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (72)
References
Acredolo, L. P., & Goodwyn, S. (1988). Symbolic
gesturing in normal infants. Child
Development, 59(2), 450–466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbib, M. A. (2012). How
the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The
emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Young
children create iconic gestures to inform others. Developmental
Psychology, 50(8), 2049–2060. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bellagamba, F., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Re-enacting
intended acts: Comparing 12- and 18-month-olds. Infant Behavior &
Development, 22(2), 277–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bigham, S., & Bourchier-Sutton, A. (2007). The
decontextualization of form and function in the development of pretence. The British
Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 25(3), 335–351. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyatzis, C. J., & Watson, M. W. (1993). Preschool
children’s symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child
Development, 64(3), 729–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brentari, D., Coppola, M., Mazzoni, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). When
does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and
homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 30(1), 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brentari, D., Di Renzo, A., Keane, J., & Volterra, V. (2015). Cognitive,
cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing
agentivity. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 7(1), 95–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The
ecology of human development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, S., Mittermaier, E., Kher, T., & Arnold, P. (2019). How
pantomime works: Implications for theories of language origin. Frontiers in
Communication, 4, 9. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K. M., & Menon, R. (2005). On
beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions
in humans. Cognitive Brain
Research, 25(1), 226–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buxbaum, L. J., Shapiro, A. D., & Coslett, H. B. (2014). Critical
brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis. Brain: A
Journal of Neurology, 137(pt
7), 1971–1985. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Capirci, O., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2022). Interaction
among modalities and within development. In Gesture in
language: Development across the
lifespan (pp. 113–133). De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, S. M., Davis, A. C., & Leach, J. G. (2005). Less
Is more: Executive function and symbolic representation in preschool
children.” Psychological
Science, 16(8), 609–616. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Volterra, V. (2012). Early
action and gesture “vocabulary” and its relation with word comprehension and
production. Child
Development, 83(2), 526–542. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic
functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child
Development, 62(4), 736–752. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming
symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 8(2), 66–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness,
iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edmiston, P., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2018). Repeated
imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 285(1874). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elder, J. L., & Pederson, D. R. (1978). Preschool
children’s use of objects in symbolic play. Child
Development, 49(2), 500. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
England, M., & Nicoladis, E. (2018). Functional
fixedness and body-part-as-object production in pantomime. Acta
Psychologica, 190, 174–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, S., McNeill, D., & Singleton, J. (1996). Silence
is liberating: Removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual
modality. Psychological
Review, 103(1), 34–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1963). Disturbance
of gesture and pantomime in aphasia. Brain: A Journal of
Neurology, 86, 703–720. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwyn, S. W., & Acredolo, L. P. (1993). Symbolic
gesture versus word: is there a modality advantage for onset of symbol use? Child
Development, 64(3), 688–701. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwyn, S. W., Acredolo, L. P., & Brown, C. A. (2000). Impact
of symbolic gesturing on early language development. Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior, 24(2), 81–103. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture
as a communication strategy in second language discourse. Lund University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A
course in modern linguistics. MacMillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopkins, E. J., Smith, E. D., Weisberg, D. S., & Lillard, A. S. (2016). The
development of substitute object pretense: The differential importance of form and
function. Journal of Cognition
and, 17(2), 197–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hwang, S.-O., Tomita, N., Morgan, H., Ergin, R., İlkbaşaran, D., Seegers, S., Lepic, R., & Padden, C. (2017). Of
the body and the hands: patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and
Cognition, 9(4), 573–602. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning
to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American
children. First
Language, 28(2), 164–181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackowitz, E. R., & Watson, M. W. (1980). Development
of object transformations in early pretend play. Developmental
Psychology, 16(6), 543–549. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, J. C., Durieux-Smith, A., & Bloom, K. (2005). Teaching
gestural signs to infants to advance child development: A review of the evidence. First
Language, 25(2), 235–251. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, E. F. (1968). Gestural
representation of implement usage: An organismic-developmental study
[PhD]. Clark University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirk, E., Howlett, N., Pine, K. J., & Fletcher, B. C. (2013). To
sign or not to sign? The impact of encouraging infants to gesture on infant language and maternal
mind-mindedness. Child
Development, 84(2), 574–590. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The
signs of language. Harvard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labuschagne, L. G., Cox, T.-J., Brown, K. & Scarf, D. (2017). Too
cool? Symbolic but not iconic stimuli impair 4-year-old children’s performance on the delay-of-gratification choice
paradigm. Behavioural
Processes, 135, 36–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy, E. & McNeill, D. (2015). Narrative
development in young children: Gesture, imagery, and cohesion. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marentette, P., Furman, R., Suvanto, M. E., & Nicoladis, E. (2020). Pantomime
(not silent gesture) in multimodal communication: Evidence from children’s
narratives. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11(November), 575952. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marentette, P., Pettenati, P., Bello, A., & Volterra, V. (2016). Gesture
and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-year-olds. Child
Development, 87(3), 944–961. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand
and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeill, D. (2012). How
language began: Gesture and speech in human
evolution. CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeill, D. (2016). Why
we gesture: The surprising role of hand movements in communication. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mineiro, A., Báez-Montero, I. C., Moita, M., Galhano-Rodrigues, I., & Castro-Caldas, A. (2021). Disentangling
pantomime from early sign in a new sign language: Window into language evolution
research. Frontiers in
Psychology, 12(December), 1130. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, R. W., & Clark, H. (2015). Experimenter’s
pantomimes influence children’s use of body part as object and imaginary object pantomimes: A
replication. Journal of Cognition and
Development, 16(5), 703–718. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mizuguchi, T., & Sugai, K. (2002). Object
related knowledge and the production of gestures with imagined objects by preschool
children. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 94, 71–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moita, M., Abreu, A. M., & Mineiro, A. (2022). Tracking
the evolution of iconic signs to understand the emergence of a phonological system. [Manuscript submitted for
publication]. Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, C. (2014). Gestural
modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body-Language-Communication:
An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). de Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Namy, L. L. (2001). What’s
in a name when it isn’t a word? 17-month-olds’ mapping of nonverbal symbols to object
categories. Infancy, 2(1), 73–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using
representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child
Development, 66(4), 999–1010. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Systematic
mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of
silent gesture. Behavior Research
Methods, 52(1), 51–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A. (2020). Types
of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across
cultures. Language and
Cognition, 12(1), 84–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Overton, W. F., & Jackson, J. P. (1973). The
representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child
Development, 44(2), 309–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padden, C. A., Meir, I., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., Seegers, S., & Sampson, T. (2013). Patterned
iconicity in sign language
lexicons. Gesture, 13(3), 287–308. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity
as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers
in Psychology, 1, 227. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piaget, J. (1962). Plays,
dreams, and imitation in childhood. Norton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schouwstra, M., Swart, H., & Thompson, B. (2019). Interpreting
silent gesture: Cognitive biases and rational inference in emerging language
systems. Cognitive
Science, 43(7), 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sonesson, G. (2007). From
the meaning of embodiment to the embodiment of meaning: A study in phenomenological
semiotics. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, & R. M. Frank (Eds.), Body,
Language, and Mind, Vol. 1. Embodiment.
(pp. 85–128). De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sonesson, G. (2010). From
mimicry to mime by way of mimesis: Reflections on a general theory of iconicity. Sign
Systems
Studies, 38(1/4), 18–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign
language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American
deaf. Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Striano, T., Tomasello, M., & Rochat, P. (2001). Social
and object support for early symbolic play. Developmental
Science, 4(4), 442–455. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M., Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Do
young children use objects as symbols? The British Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 17, 563–584. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Troseth, G. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1998). The
medium can obscure the message: Young children’s understanding of video. Child
Development, 69(4), 950–965. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallotton, C. D., & Ayoub, C. C. (2010). Symbols
build communication and thought: The role of gestures and words in the development of engagement skills and
social-emotional concepts during toddlerhood. Social
Development, 19(3), 601–626. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Production
and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8(July), 1095. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P. (2015). Language
evolution: Why Hockett’s design features are a
non-starter. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 29–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weidinger, N., Lindner, K., Hogrefe, K., Ziegler, W., & Goldenberg, G. (2017). Getting
a grasp on children’s representational capacities in pantomime of object use. Journal
of Cognition and
Development, 18(2), 246–269. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol
formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of
thought. Wiley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zlatev, J., Żywiczyński, P., & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime
as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language
Evolution, 5(2), 156–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Żywiczyński, P., Wacewicz, S., & Lister, C. (2021). Pantomimic
fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
of London. Series B, Biological
Sciences, 376(1824), 20200204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Mineiro, Ana & Mara Moita
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.