Cited by

Cited by 35 other publications

Ariel, Mira
2014. Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Beuls, Katrien & Remi van Trijp
2016. Computational construction grammar and constructional change. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2014. Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia
2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll
2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Du Bois, John W.
2014. Motivating competitions. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis
2014. Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Haiman, John
2014. Six competing motives for repetition. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Hawkins, John A.
2014. Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2014. Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen
2014. Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Jansson, Fredrik, Andrew Buskell & Magnus Enquist
2023. Cultural Systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution, DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven
2014. Competing cues in early syntactic development. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop
2014. Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
MacWhinney, Brian
2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik
2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, DOI logo
Malchukov, Andrej
2014. Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Mondorf, Britta
2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Moravcsik, Edith
2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014. Where do motivations compete?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Nobel, Thomas, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Jan Mark Pleijsant & Mats Ouborg
2020. Word Meaning, Data Semantics, Crowdsourcing, and the BKM/A-Lex Approach. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Workshops [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11878],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Peeters, Stijn, Marc Tuters, Tom Willaert & Daniël de Zeeuw
2021. On the Vernacular Language Games of an Antagonistic Online Subculture. Frontiers in Big Data 4 DOI logo
Pfeiffer, Martin
2014. Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Rasheed, Nadia & Shamsudin H. M. Amin
2016. Developmental and Evolutionary Lexicon Acquisition in Cognitive Agents/Robots with Grounding Principle: A Short Review. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2016  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan
2014. Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Spike, Matthew, Kevin Stadler, Simon Kirby & Kenny Smith
2017. Minimal Requirements for the Emergence of Learned Signaling. Cognitive Science 41:3  pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Strunk, Jan
2014. A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Van Eecke, Paul, Katrien Beuls, Jérôme Botoko Ekila & Roxana Rădulescu
2022. Language games meet multi-agent reinforcement learning: A case study for the naming game. Journal of Language Evolution 7:2  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Notes on contributors. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Copyright Page. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Preface. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of figures and tables. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xiv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of abbreviations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xviii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.