Cover not available
Part of
Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports
Edited by Christian Meyer and Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
[Advances in Interaction Studies 8] 2017
► pp. 245–265

Chapter 10
Teaching bodies

Visual and haptic communication in martial arts

The article is concerned with teaching and learning embodied knowledge in a martial arts class. It argues that in pair exercises of motion sequences practitioners do not only enact something together in a shared corporeality. Rather, these exercises are also communicative means. We can therefore speak of haptic communication once physical contact between bodies is made in the expectation that the other participant will understand the contact as a sign and react to it in a certain way. In martial arts classes different forms of contact between bodies are accomplished in order to create embodied experience about the movement order the students wish to learn.

Keywords: embodied knowledge, communication, learning, martial arts, ethnography
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Learning martial arts as an ethnographer
  • Teaching by doing – visual communication in martial arts classes
  • Embodied learning
  • Haptic communication
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.10sch
References
Alkemeyer, T.
(2011) Bewegen und Mitbewegen. Zeigen und Sich-Zeigen-Lassen als soziale Körperpraxis. In R. Schmidt, W. M. Stock, & J. Volbers (eds.), Zeigen: Dimensionen einer Grundtätigkeit (pp. 44–72). Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
Barnes, B.
(2001) Practice as collective action. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 17–28). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Delamont, S., & Stephens, N.
(2006) Balancing the Berimbau. Embodied Ethographic Understanding. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 316–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downey, G.
(2007) Producing Pain: Techniques and Technologies in No-Holds-Barred Fighting. Social Studies of Science, 37(2), 201–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham et al:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Gebauer, G., & Wulf, C.
(1992) Mimesis: Kultur – Kunst – Gesellschaft (2nd ed.) Reinbek: rororo.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1963) Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1979) Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper&Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2000) Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157–182). London et al.: SAGE.Google Scholar
(2003) The Body in Action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourse, the Body, and Identity (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
(1996) Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.), Kognition and Communication at Work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge, England / New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A.
(2002) The Tacit Order of Teamwork: Collaboration and Embodied Conduct in Anesthesia. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(2), 139–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschauer, S.
(2006) Putting things into words. Ethnographic description and the silence of the social. Human Studies, 29(4), 413–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalthoff, H.
(2003) Beobachtende Differenz. Instrumente der ethnografisch-soziologischen Forschung. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 32(1), 70–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Messmer, H.
(2003a) Der soziale Konflikt: kommunikative Emergenz und systemische Reproduktion. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Konflikt und Konfliktepisode. Prozesse, Strukturen und Funktionen einer sozialen Form. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32(2), 98–122.Google Scholar
Mol, A.
(2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham/London: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, E.
(2005) Embodied Knowledge The Experience of Meaning and the Struggle Towards Proficiency in Glassblowing. Ethnography, 6(2), 183–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olivero, F., John, P., & Sutherland R.
(2004) Seeing Is Believing: Using Videopapers to Transform Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Practice. Cambridge Journal of Education 34, 179–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plowman, L., & Stephen, C.
(2008) The Big Picture? Video and the Representation of Interaction. British Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 541–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M.
(1966) The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G.
(2000) The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Schindler, L.
(2009) The production of «vis-ability»: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. In U. T. Kissmann (ed.), Video Interaction Analysis: Methods and Methodology (pp. 135–154). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011a) Kampffertigkeit: Eine Soziologie praktischen Wissens. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Teaching by Doing: Zur körperlichen Vermittlung von Wissen. In R. Keller & M. Meuser (eds.), Körperwissen (pp. 335–350). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütz, A.
(1944) The Stranger. An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49, 499–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1945) The Homecomer. American Journal of Sociology, 50, 363–376.Google Scholar
Shilling, C.
(2012) The Body and Social Theory. London/ Thousand Oaks/ New Dehli: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinney, J.
(2006) A Place of Sense: a Kinaesthetic Ethnography of Cyclists on Mont Ventoux. Environment and Planning D, 24(5), 709–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L., & Trigg, R.
(1991) Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (pp. 65–90). Hillsdase, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. J.
(2004) Body & soul. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesemann, J. & Amann, K.
(2002) Situationistische Unterrichtsforschung. Forum qualitative Schulforschung 2, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(2003) Philosophische Untersuchungen (5th ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Brümmer, Kristina
2019. Spielsysteme, Matchpläne, Spielanalysen. Sport und Gesellschaft 16:3 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Johanne S. Philipsen
2022. Forms of professional interkinesthesia in nurses' body work: A case study of an infant's stepping. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Lundesjö Kvart, Susanne & Helen Melander Bowden
2022. Instructing Equestrian Feel: On the Art of Teaching Embodied Knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 66:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.