References

References

Arnold, L.
(2012) Dialogic Embodied Action: Using Gesture to Organize Sequence and Participation in Instructional Interaction. In Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 269–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L. & T. Luckmann
(1966) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Buhler, K.
([1934] 1965) Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ehmer, O.
(2011) Imagination und Animation. Die Herstellung mentaler Räume durch animierte Rede. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2003) The semiotic body in its environment. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourses of the body. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., J. Hindmarsh & P. Luff
(2010) Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Herbrik, R.
(2009) Die Kommunikative Konstruktion imaginärer Welten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L.
(2014) Having a ball – Immaterial objects in dance instruction. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann and M. Rauniomaa, eds.: Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 249–268.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H.
(1992) Anthropologie der symbolischen Kommunikation – Die Phänomenologie des Alltags und die Fragestellungen der Anthropologie der Literatur. Konstanz: Paper for the Collaborative Research Centres 511, Literature and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Lindwall, O. & A. Ekström
(2012) Instruction-in-Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill. In Human Studies 35 (1): 27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loland, S.
(2006) Three approaches in the study of pain. In Loland, S., B. Skirstad & I. Waddington, eds.: Pain and Injury in sports: Social and ethical analysis. London: Routledge, 49–62.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. & Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
(2013) Skopische Sozialität: Sichtbarkeitsregime und visuelle Praktiken im Boxen. Soziale Welt 64 (1/2): 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Teamsubjekte: Rituelle Körpertechniken und Formen der Vergemeinschaftung im Spitzensport. In R. Gugutzer & M. Staack, eds.: Rituale und Körper. Sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Zugänge und Analysen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
. (forthc.). Multiparty Coordination under Time Pressure: The Social Organization of Handball Team Time-Out Activities. In C. Gerhard & E. Reber eds.: Embodied Activities in Talk – Talk in Embodied Activities.
Murphy, Keith M.
(2004) Imagination as Joint Activity. The case of architectural Interaction, in Mind, Culture and Activity, 11 (4), pp. 267–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, A.
(2003) Imagination in Action, in Theory and Psychology, 13 (2), pp. 177–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. & T. Luckman
(1973) The Structures of the Life-World. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
(1989) The Structures of the Life-World, Vol. II. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schindler, L.
(2011) Teaching by Doing: Zur körperlichen Vermittlung von Wissen. In R. Keller & M. Meuser, eds.: Körperwissen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A.
(2013) Die Qualität der Spannung. In Soziale Welt 64, pp. 97–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A.
(2012) Imagined Spaces as a resource of interaction. In Bulletin VALS-ASLA No 96, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Urgesi, C., M. M. Savonitto, F. Fabbro & Salvatore M. Aglioti
(2012) Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. In Psychological Research 76 (4), pp. 542–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar