Cover not available
Part of
Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports
Edited by Christian Meyer and Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
[Advances in Interaction Studies 8] 2017
► pp. 345–354

Chapter 14
Afterword

Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.14str
References
Alkemeyer, T.
(2006) Rhythmen, Resonanzen und Missklänge. Über die Körperlichkeit der Produktion des Sozialen im Spiel. In Gugutzer, R. (ed.), body turn. Perspektiven der Soziologie des Körpers und des Sports. Bielefeld: transcript, 265–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alkemeyer, T. & Michaeler, M.
(2013) Subjektivierung als (Aus-)Bildung körperlich-mentaler Mitspielkompetenz. Eine praxeologische Perspektive auf Trainingstechniken im Sportspiel. In Gelhard, A., Alkemeyer, T. & Ricken, N. (eds.). Techniken der Subjektivierung. München: Fink 2013, S. 213–227.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. & Stickle, T.
(2012) Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices. Discourse Studies 14/1: 1, 1–30Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., Thompson, S. A. & Drake, V.
(2012) Bodily-visual practices and turn continuations. Discourse Processes 49(3–4):192–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
(1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
in press). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P.
(1996) Convergent activity: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M.
([1962] 1926) Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ingold, T.
(2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M.
(2006) Motor Cognition. What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(1990) Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsbourne, M., & Jordan, J. S.
(2009) Embodied anticipation; A neuro-developmental interpretation. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 103–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, W. H.
(1995): Keeping Together in Time. Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1964) The Philosopher and his Shadow. In M. Merleau-Ponty (ed.), Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
(eds.) (2017) Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds.), Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 207–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica(191), 233–256.Google Scholar
Oostenbroek, J., Suddendorf, T., Nielsen, M., Redshaw, J., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Davis, J., Clark, S., & Slaughter, V.
(2016) Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans. Current Biology, 26, 1334–1338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2–27Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 266–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, A.
(1932) Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Wien: J. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1962–1966) Collected Papers. ed. by I. Schutz, A. Gurwitsch. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E.
(eds.) (2010) Enaction. Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J.
(2013) Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C.
(eds.) (2011) Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
(eds.) (2009) Anticipation and Projection in Embodied Interaction. Special double issue. Discourse Processes, 46, 2–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in Life. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. B.
(1979) Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (ed.), Before Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar