Alkemeyer, T.
(2006) Rhythmen, Resonanzen und Missklänge. Über die Körperlichkeit der Produktion des Sozialen im Spiel. In Gugutzer, R. (ed.), body turn. Perspektiven der Soziologie des Körpers und des Sports. Bielefeld: transcript, 265–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alkemeyer, T. & Michaeler, M.
(2013) Subjektivierung als (Aus-)Bildung körperlich-mentaler Mitspielkompetenz. Eine praxeologische Perspektive auf Trainingstechniken im Sportspiel. In Gelhard, A., Alkemeyer, T. & Ricken, N. (eds.). Techniken der Subjektivierung. München: Fink 2013, S. 213–227.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. & Stickle, T.
(2012) Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices. Discourse Studies 14/1: 1, 1–30Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., Thompson, S. A. & Drake, V.
(2012) Bodily-visual practices and turn continuations. Discourse Processes 49(3–4):192–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
(1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
in press). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P.
(1996) Convergent activity: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M.
([1962] 1926) Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ingold, T.
(2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M.
(2006) Motor Cognition. What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(1990) Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsbourne, M., & Jordan, J. S.
(2009) Embodied anticipation; A neuro-developmental interpretation. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 103–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, W. H.
(1995): Keeping Together in Time. Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1964) The Philosopher and his Shadow. In M. Merleau-Ponty (ed.), Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
(eds.) (2017) Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds.), Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 207–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica(191), 233–256.Google Scholar
Oostenbroek, J., Suddendorf, T., Nielsen, M., Redshaw, J., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Davis, J., Clark, S., & Slaughter, V.
(2016) Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans. Current Biology, 26, 1334–1338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2–27Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 266–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, A.
(1932) Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Wien: J. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1962–1966) Collected Papers. ed. by I. Schutz, A. Gurwitsch. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E.
(eds.) (2010) Enaction. Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J.
(2013) Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C.
(eds.) (2011) Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
(eds.) (2009) Anticipation and Projection in Embodied Interaction. Special double issue. Discourse Processes, 46, 2–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in Life. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. B.
(1979) Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (ed.), Before Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar