Sociobiological Bases of Information Structure

| University of Roma Tre
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027204639 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027264688 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
The book tackles the sociobiological bases of Information Structure (IS) inquiring both its evidential and neurobiological underpinnings in human communication. Its purpose is to delve into the epistemic and neurocognitive rationales behind the realization of informational hierarchies in a sentence. The book zooms in on an interplay, that between IS and evidentiality, that has never been explored in IS studies and seeks to recast IS phenomena in an epistemological perspective. The neurocognitive approaches discussed propose neurophysiological investigations on IS processing, both with ERP and ERS vs. ERD measurements. In its overall structure and general purposes, the book is conceived for interested scholars working in the fields of linguistics, neuropragmatics, experimental psychology, philosophy of language and cognitive sciences in general, and it adds some further contribution to ongoing psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic experimental research on the processing of topic-focus and presupposition-assertion dichotomies.
[Advances in Interaction Studies, 9]  2017.  xxi, 193 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of tables
xi
List of figures
xiii
Preface
xv–xx
Acknowledgments
xxi
Chapter 1. Presupposition and assertion: Theoretical overviews
1–24
Chapter 2. Topic, focus, given and new: Theoretical overviews
25–50
Chapter 3. Sociobiological perspectives: For a unified account of evidentiality and information structure
51–80
Chapter 4. Experimental perspectives on information structure processing: A literature review
81–109
Chapter 5. Experimental perspectives on information structure processing: Two electrophysiological studies
111–142
Chapter 6. A biolinguistic perspective on information structure
143–172
References
173–188
Index
189–193
“This book opens a new perspective in the studies on both Evidentiality and Information Structure, in that it shows that the two categories are strongly related. Moreover, it is among the first studies accounting for neuroscientific inquiry on Information Structure categories such as presuppositions.”
“By combining together a solid experimental design in neurolinguistics with a fresh look at evidentiality as pragmatic information managing, which goes beyond the traditional restriction to information source, Viviana Masia has produced a thought-provoking piece of research that will be of interest both to linguists and neuro-/psycholinguists.”
“The research presents an updated survey of the main theoretical approaches dedicated to the analysis of Information Structure. The focus is on the relationship between evidentiality and the essential properties of information units, trying a new path for their definition. A specific added value of the work is its strong look to the neurocognitive bases that support the decoding of Information Structure, both in isolated utterances and in the wider social context of the discourse. Coherently with the idea that presupposition is at the basis of topicalization, her experiments show that the best processing of topicalized and focused information is the outcome of expectations derived from the listener’s model. Finding an evolutionistic explanation for Information Structure is the final goal of the research.”
References

References

Aben, B., Stapert, S., & Blokland, A.
(2012) About the distinction between working memory and short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(301). Crossref link
Adams, J. M.
(2006) The performative nature and function of Isaiah 40–55. Norfolk: T & T Clark.
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alston, W. P.
(2000) Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Amaral, P., & Cummins, C.
(2015) A cross-linguistic study on information backgrounding and presupposition projection. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perpsectives on presuppositions (pp. 157–172). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
Anderson, L. B.
(1986) Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 273–312). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Andorno, C.
(2005) Che cos’è la pragmatica linguistica. Roma: Carocci.
Annett, M.
(1967) The binomial distribution of right, left and mixed handedness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 327–333. Crossref link
Arbib, M. A.
(2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 105–167. Crossref link
Austen, J.
(1811) Sense and sensibility. Reprinted by ESD Cloud Media, 2014. Crossref link
Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baker, N. D., & Greenfield, P.
(1988) The development of new and old information in young children’s early language. Language Sciences, 10(1), 3–34. Crossref link
Bambini, V.
(2010) Neuropragmatics: A foreword. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 1–20.
(2012) Neurolinguistics. In J-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Bambini, V., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M.
(2014) A dataset of metaphors from the Italian literature: Exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. PLoS ONE, 9, e105634. Crossref link
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van Berkum, J. J., & Hagoort, P.
(2002a) Event-related theta power increase in the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters, 323, 13–16. Crossref link
(2002b) Syntactic processing modulates the theta rhythm of the human EEG. Neuroimage, 17, 1479–1492. Crossref link
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van der Linden, M., ter Keurs, M., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P.
(2005) Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 530–541. Crossref link
Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P.
(2006) Oscillatory neural dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196. Crossref link
Bates, E.
(1976) Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Baumann, S., & Schumacher, B. P.
(2011) (De-)Accentuation and the processing of information status: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Speech, 55(3), 361–381. Crossref link
Benatar, A., & Clifton, C. Jr
(2014) Newness, givenness and discourse updating: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 1–16. Crossref link
Benveniste, E.
(Ed.) (1971[1958]) Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics [Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Berger, H.
(1929) Über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr, 87, 527–570. Crossref link
Best, C. T.
(1988) The emergence of cerebral asymmetries in early human development: A literature review and a neuroembryological model. In D. L. Molfese & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Brain lateralization in children (pp. 5–34). New York: Guilford Press.
Bianchi, C.
(2009) Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Bickerton, D.
(1995) Language and Human Behavior. Washington: University of Washington Press.
Birch, S., & Rayner, K.
(1997) Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 653–660. Crossref link
Blakemore, D.
(1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boas, F.
(1900) Sketch of the Kwakiutl language. American Anthropologist, 2, 708–721. Crossref link
(1910) Kwakiutl. An illustrative sketch. Washington: Government Printing Office.
Bock, K. J. & Mazzella, J. R.
(1983) Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 64–76. Crossref link
Bolinger, D. L.
(1965) Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bolinger, D.
(1986) Intonation and its parts. Melody in Spoken English. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schumacher, P. B.
(2016) Towards a neurobiology of information structure. In F. Caroline & I. Sinichiro (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 581–598). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bréal, M.
(1964 [1900]) Semantics: Studies in the science of meaning. New York: Dover.
Bredart, S. & Modolo, K.
(1988) Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67, 135–144. Crossref link
Brentano, F.
(1973[1874]) Psychology from an empirical point of view. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and Linda L. McAlister, from Psychologie vom empirischen Standtpunkt , Sections V–IX.
Brodmann, K.
(1909) Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag.
Brody, M.
(1990) Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 201–225.
Burkhardt, P.
(2006) Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168. Crossref link
(2007) The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Neuroreport, 18(17), 1851–1854. Crossref link
Burkhardt, P., & Roehm, D.
(2007) Differential effects of saliency: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 413, 115–120. Crossref link
Burkhardt, P.
(2008) Two types of definites: Evidence for presupposition cost. In A. Grønn (Ed.), Proceedings of SuB12 (pp. 66–80). Oslo: ILOS.
Burmester, J., Spalek, K., & Wartenburger, I.
(2014) Context updating during sentence comprehension: The effect of aboutness topic. Brain and Language, 137, 62–76. Crossref link
Büring, D.
(2003) On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511–545. Crossref link
Camblin, C. C., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y.
(2007) The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 103–128. Crossref link
Campbell, A. L., Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M.
(2000) Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 1337–1349. Crossref link
Cardona, T. R., & Volterra, V.
(2007) Le lingue dei segni. Storia e semiotica. Roma: Carocci.
Chafe, W.
(1974) Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111–133. Crossref link
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.
(1998) Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry, 8, 1-17. Crossref link
Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J.
(Eds.) (1986) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, W.
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1994) Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J.
(1993) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Chemla, E.
(2009) Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Under revision for Semantics and Pragmatics .
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
(1971) Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovitz (Eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 183–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1980) Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
(2006) Language and the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
(2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 489–558. Crossref link
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E.
(1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood: N. J.-Ablex.
Cole, M.
(1992) Context, modularity, and the cultural constitution of development. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development within social contexts (pp. 5–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T.
(2005) Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archeological Journal, 15(1), 5–26. Crossref link
Coppock, E.
(2014) Introduction to dynamic semantics. Slides available at http://​eecoppock​.info​/DynamicSemantics​/Lectures​/why​-dymsem​-part1​.pdf.
Corballis, M. C.
(2003) From hand to mouth: The origins of language. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cory, B., Romoli, J., Schwarz, F., & Crain, S.
(2014) Scalar Implicatures vs. Presuppositions: The View from Acquisition. Topoi, 35(1), 57–71. Crossref link
Cowan, N.
(2008) What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. Crossref link
Cowles, H. W., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M.
(2007) Violations of information structure. An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 102, 228–242. Crossref link
Cresti, E.
(1987) L’articolazione dell’informazione nel parlato. In AA. VV., Gli italiani parlati (pp. 27–90). Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
(1992) Le unità d’informazione e la teoria degli atti linguistici. In G. Gobber (Ed.), Atti del XXIV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Linguistica e pragmatica (pp. 501–529). Roma: Bulzoni.
(2000) Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M.
(2010) Informational patterning theory and the corpus-based description of spoken language: The compositionality issue in the topic-comment pattern. In M. Moneglia & A. Panunzi (Eds.), Bootstrapping information from corpora in a cross-linguistic perspective. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Croft, W.
(2001) Functional approaches to grammar. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 6323–6330). Oxford: Elsevier Sciences. Crossref link
Daneš, F.
(1966) A three-level approach to syntax. In F. Daneš et al. (Eds.), Travaux linguistiques de Prague (pp. 225–240). Paris: Klincksieck.
(1974) Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence persepctive (pp. 106–128). Prague: Academia/The Hague-Mouton.
Darwin, C.
(1859) The origin of species. London: Clowes & Sons.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S.
(2004) EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including indepllendent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. Crossref link
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J.
(1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. Crossref link
Dik, S. C.
(1978) Functional grammar [North-Holland Linguistic Series 37]. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Domaneschi, F., Carrea, E., Penco, C., & Greco, A.
(2014) The cognitive load of presupposition triggers: Mandatory and optional repairs in presupposition failure. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 136–146. Crossref link
Domaneschi, F., & Carrea, E.
(2015) Attivatori presupposizionali e failure: uno studio psicolinguistico. Sistemi Intelligenti, 2, 303–322.
Domaneschi, F.
(Ed.) (2015) Special issue of Topoi on presuppositions: Philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Domaneschi, F., Carrea, E., Penco, C., & Greco, A.
(2016) Selecting presuppositions in conditional clauses. Results from a psycholinguistic experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2026. Crossref link
Donnellan, K.
(1966) Reference and Definite Descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75(3), 281–304. Crossref link
Dudley, R., Orita, N., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J.
(2015)  Three-year-olds’ understanding of know and think. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions (pp. 241–262). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
Dummett, M.
(1981) Frege: Philosophy of language, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
(2006) Thought and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Dunn, J.
(1988) The beginning of social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E.
(1981) From words to meanings: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551. Crossref link
Erteschik-Shir, N.
(1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faller, M. T.
(2002) Semantics and pragmatics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stanford, PhD Dissertation Thesis.
Fillmore, C. J.
(1971) Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description. In C. J. Fillmore & T. D. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 272–289). New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.
Firbas, J.
(1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Flavell, J., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R.
(1990) Developmental changes in young children’s knowledge about the mind. Cognitive Development, 5, 1–27. Crossref link
Fox, B. A.
(2001) Evidentiality, authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11(2), 167–192. Crossref link
Fox, D., & Katzir, R.
(2010) On the characterization of alternatives. Available at: http://​web​.mit​.edu​/linguistics​/people​/faculty​/fox​/FoxKatzir​.pdf.
Frascarelli, M.
(2008) The fine structure of the topic field. In C. De Cat & K. Demuth (Eds.), The Bantu-Romance Connection. A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure (pp. 261–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Friederici, A. D.
(2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(2), 78–84. Crossref link
Frege, G.
(1892) Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50.
(1918) Negation: A logical investigation. In P. T. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (2nd ed., pp. 117–135). Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedman, V. A.
(1986) Evidentiality in the Balkans. Macedonian and Albanian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 168–187). Norwood: Ablex.
Gabelentz, von der G.
(1869) Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 6.
Gagliardi, G., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Tamburini, F.
(2012) A topologic view of topic and focus marking in Italian. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. M. Doğan, M. Bente, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings 8th International Conference on Language Resources and – LREC 2012 (pp. 948–955). Istanbul: LREC.
Geurts, B.
(1999) Presuppositions and pronouns. [Current research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 3]. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.
Givón, T.
(1975) Focus and the scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics, 6, 185–205.
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
(1982) Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language, 6, 23–49. Crossref link
(1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross language study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1989) Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1993) Coherence in context, coherence in mind. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1(2). Crossref link
(2001) Syntax: An introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2002) Bio-linguistics. The Santa-Barbara lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2009) The genesis of syntactic complexity: Diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Glanzberg, M.
(2003) Felicity and presupposition triggers. Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics . Michigan: University of Michigan.
(2005) Presuppositions, truth values and expressing propositions. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning and truth (pp. 349–396). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, E. B.
(2010) Sensation and perception. USA: Wadsworth.
Goodnow, J. J., & Warton, P.
(1993) Contexts and cognitions: Taking a pluralistic view. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 157–177). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, L. A., & Gilliom, L. A.
(1993) Pronouns, names and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Sciences, 17, 311–347. Crossref link
Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D.
(1995) Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(2), 2016–2031. Crossref link
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S.
(1982) Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15. Crossref link
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D.
(2010) The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188. Crossref link
Grice, P. H.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press.
Guiard, Y.
(1987) Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 486–517. Crossref link
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J.
(1993) The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 337–364. Crossref link
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M.
(2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–442. Crossref link
Hagoort, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(2014) Neuropragmatics. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 667–674). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1985) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D.
(1999) Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. Crossref link
Harnad, S.
(1976) Induction, evolution and accountability. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 58–60. Crossref link
Hawkins, J. A.
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Heim, I.
(1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. University of Massachussetts, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
(1983) On the projection problem for presuppositions. Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 114–125.
Heritage, J.
(2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. Crossref link
Hertrich, I., Kirsten, M., Tiemann, S., Beck, S., Whüle, A., Ackermann, H., & Rolke, B.
(2015) Context-dependent impact of presuppositions on early magnetic brain responses during speech perception. Brain and Language, 148, 1–12. Crossref link
Hill, J., & Irvine, J.
(Eds.) (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, L. R.
(1981) Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts. North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 11, 125–142.
Hornby, P. A.
(1971) A psychological investigation of presupposition. Talk presented at the 1971 Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America . Buffalo, New York.
(1973) Intonation and syntactic structure in the development of presupposition. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 18 p.
(1974) Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 530–538. Crossref link
Hruska, C., & Alter, K.
(2004) Prosody in dialogues and single sentences: How prosody can influence speech perception. In A. Steube (Ed.), Language, context and cognition. Information structure: Theoretical and empirical aspects (pp. 211–223). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref link
Irwin, D. E., Bock, K. J., & Stanovich, K. E.
(1982) Effects of information structure cues on visual word processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 307–325. Crossref link
Jakobson, R.
(1957) Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge Mass.: Russian Language Project, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, Harvard University, p. 14. Repub. as SW II, 10 (130-147).
Jayez, J., Mongelli, V., Reboul, A., & Henst van der, J. B.
(2015) Weak and strong triggers. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 173–193). Dordrecht: Springers International Publishing.
Jäncke, L., Schlaug, G., & Steinmetz, H.
(1997) Hand skill asymmetry in professional musicians. Brain and Cognition, 34, 424–432. Crossref link
Jäncke, L., Shah, N. J., & Peters, M.
(2000) Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 177–183. Crossref link
Jenkins, L.
(2000) Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Johnson, C. N., & Maratsos, M. P.
(1977) Early comprehension of mental verbs: Think and know. Child Development, 48(4), 1743–1747. Crossref link
Jouravlev, O., Stearns, L., Bergen, L., Eddy, M., Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E.
(2016) Processing temporal presuppositions: An event-related potential study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Crossref link
Kaan, E., Harris A., Gibson E., & Holcomb, P. J.
(2000) The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 159–201. Crossref link
Kamio, A.
(1994) The theory of territory of information. The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 67–100. Crossref link
(1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kamp, H.
(1981) A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, & M. B. J. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U.
(1993) From discourse to logic: Introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Kamp, H., Van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U.
(2011) Discourse representation theory. Handbook of philosophical logic, Vol. 15 (pp. 125–394). Netherlands: Springer. Crossref link
Karmiloff-Smith, A.
(1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Karttunen, L.
(1973) Presupposition of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169–193.
(1974) Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1(1–3), 181-194. Crossref link
Keenan-Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B.
(1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 335–384). New York: Academic Press.
Kempson, R. M.
(1975) Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
(1986) L’implicite. Paris: Armand Colin.
Kiparsky, C., & Kiparsky, P.
(1971) Fact. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovitz (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirby, S.
(1999) Function, selection, and innateness. The emergence of language universals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Köhler, W.
(1947) Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
Krifka, M.
(2007) Functional similarities between bimanual coordination and topic/comment structure. In S. Ishihara, S. Jannedy, & A. Schwarz (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 8, 61–96.
(2008) Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3-4), 243–276. Crossref link
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A.
(1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. Crossref link
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D.
(2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. Crossref link
(2011) Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. Crossref link
Kutas, M., De Long, K. A., & Smith, J. N.
(2011) A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain. Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Lakens, D.
(2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. Crossref link
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Langacker, R. W.
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. Crossref link
(2003) Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günther Radden [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 243] (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Langford, J., & Holmes, V. M.
(1979) Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 7, 363–383. Crossref link
LaPolla, R. J.
(2003) Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In G. Thurgood & R. J. LaPolla (Eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (pp. 22–42). London: Routledge.
La Rocca, D., Masia, V., Maiorana, E., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Campisi, P.
(2016) Brain response to information structure misalignments in linguistic contexts. Neurocomputing, 199, 1–15. Crossref link
Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M.
(1985) Possible origin of speech in Selective orienting. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 62–73. Crossref link
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. USA: The MIT Press.
Levy, R.
(2007) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Crossref link
Lewis, D.
(1979) Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(3), 339–359. Crossref link
Lieberman, P.
(1984) The biology and evolution of language. USA: Harvard University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W.
(1999) The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Loftus, E. F.
(1975) Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572. Crossref link
Lombardi Vallauri, E.
(1993) Clausole a contenuto presupposto e loro funzione discorsiva in italiano antico. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica dell’Università degli Studi di Firenze, 4, 71–95.
(1995) Tratti linguistici della persuasione in pubblicità. Lingua Nostra, 2-3, 41–51.
(1996) A simple test for Theme and Rheme in the clause complex. Language Sciences, 17(4), 357–378. Crossref link
(2000) Grammatica funzionale delle avverbiali italiane. Roma: Carocci.
(2001) La teoria come separatrice di fatti di livello diverso. L’esempio della struttura informativa dell’enunciato. In Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche, Atti del XXXIII Congresso SLI, Napoli 1999 (pp. 151–173). Roma: Bulzoni.
(2002) La struttura informativa dell’enunciato. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
(2004) The relation between mind and language: The innateness hypothesis and the poverty of the stimulus. The Linguistic Review, 21(3-4), 345–387.
(2009) La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V.
(2014) Implicitness impact: Measuring texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 161–184. Crossref link
Lombardi Vallauri, E.
(2014) The topologic hypothesis of prominence as a cue to information structure in Italian. In S. Pons Bordería (Ed.), Models of discourse segmentation. Explorations across Romance Languages [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series] (pp. 219–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V.
(2015a) Cognitive constraints on the emergence of topic-focus structure in human communication. In V. Ganfi & A. Chiera (Eds.), Immagine e pensiero. Bilanci nelle scienze cognitive attuali (pp. 180–204). Roma-Messina: Corisco.
(2015b) Context-dependent information processing: Towards an expectation-based parsing model of Information Structure. In H. Christiansen, I. Stojanovic, & G. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context [LNAI 9405 Series] (pp. 440–453). Switzerland: Springer. Crossref link
Löbner, S.
(1985) Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4, 279–326. Crossref link
Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S.
(2012) The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, J.
(1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & K. Wolfgang (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 101–124). New York: Wiley.
MacFarlane, J.
(2011) What is assertion? In J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
MacNeilage, P. F., Studdert-Kennedy, M. G., & Linblom, B.
(1984) Functional precursors to language and its lateralization. The American Journal of Physiology, 246, 912–914.
McCready, E.
(2014) What is evidence in natural language? In E. Mc Cready, K. Yabushita, & K. Yoshimoto (Eds.), Formal approaches to semantics and pragmatics, studies in linguistics and philosophy (pp. 155–180). Netherlands: Springer.
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J.
(2005) Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 296–305. Crossref link
Martinet, A.
(1955) Economie des changements phonétiques, Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: Francke. [trad. it, Economia dei mutamenti fonetici, Torino: Einaudi, 1968].
Marty, A.
(1918) Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. II, part 1. Abteilung, Halle: Max Niemeyer, Verlag.
Masia, V., Canal, P., Ricci, I., Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Bambini, V.
(2017) Presupposition of new information as a pragmatic garden path: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 31–48. Crossref link
Mathesius, V.
(1939) O tak zvaném aktuálním členĕní vĕty (On the So-Called Topic/Comment Articulation of the Sentence). SaS, 5, 171–174.
Mennes, M., Wouters, H., Vanrumste, B., Lagae, L., & Stiers, P.
(2010) Validation of ICA as a tool to remove eye movement artifacts from EEG/ERP. Psychophysiology, 47, 1142–1150. Crossref link
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Dunbar, R.
(2006) A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 405–423. Crossref link
Molinaro, N., Conrad, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M.
(2010) On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 1–7. Crossref link
Morey, R. D.
(2008) Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. Crossref link
Morris, C.
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. In C. Morris (Ed.), Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton.
Mushin, I.
(2001) Discourse analysis: Evidentiality and epistemological stance. Narrative retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Narasimhan, B., & Dimroth, C.
(2008) Word order and information status in child language. Cognition, 107, 317–319. Crossref link
Nelson, K.
(1973) Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149). Crossref link
Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2006) When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. Crossref link
Nuyts, J.
(2001) Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
(2005) Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The Expression of Modality [The Expression of Cognitive Categories 1] (pp. 1–26). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Noveck, I., & Sperber, D.
(2004) Experimental pragmatics. UK: MacMillan, Palgrave. Crossref link
Oldfield, R. C.
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. Crossref link
Ong, W. J.
(1982) Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge. Crossref link
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M.
(2010) FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Article ID 156869 Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(5), 105–113. Crossref link»
Orletti, F.
(2000) La conversazione diseguale. Roma: Carocci.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb P. J.
(1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. Crossref link
Osterhout, L., Holcomb P. J., & Swinney, D. A.
(1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental and Psychological Learning, 20, 786–803. Crossref link
Özcan, A., Tulum, Z., Lamia, P., & Başkurt, F.
(2004) Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right- and left-handed subjects. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 19, 874–878. Crossref link
Pagin, P.
(2004) Is assertion social? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 833–859. Crossref link
Park, H., & Reder, L. M.
(2004) Moses illusion: Implication for human cognition. Available at: http://​www​.psy​.cmu​.edu​/faculty​/reder​/ph​_rlm​.pdf.
Partee, B. H., Hajičová, E., & Sgall, P.
(1998) Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Amsterdam: Kluwer. Crossref link
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H.
(1999) Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1842–1857. Crossref link
Piemontese, E.
(1996) Capire e farsi capire. Teorie e tecniche della scrittura controllata. Napoli: Tecnodid.
Pierce, C. S.
(1934) Belief and judgment. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers, Vol. V. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P.
(1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–784. Crossref link
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G.
(1978) Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526. Crossref link
Price, H.
(1987) Truth and the nature of assertion. Mind, 96, 202–220. Crossref link
Puglielli, A., & Frascarelli, M.
(2008) L’analisi linguistica. Dai dati alla teoria. Italia: Caissa.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R.. et al.
(1989) Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), 21–49. Crossref link
Récanati, F.
(1987) Meaning and force. The pragmatics of performative utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D.
(2011) Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 277–293. Crossref link
Reinhart, T.
(1982) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 53–94.
Rigal, R. A.
(1992) Which handedness: Preference or performance? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 851–866. Crossref link
Rizzi, L.
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Netherlands: Springer. Crossref link
Romoli, J., & Schwarz, F.
(2015) An experimental comparison between presupposition and indirect scalar implicatures. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics Series] (pp. 215–240). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
Rooth, M.
(1985) Association with focus. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA, Dept. of Linguistics, South College, UMASS, Amherst MA 01003.
(1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116. Crossref link
Rosch, E.
(1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Roth, J.
(1979) Die indirekten Erlebnisformen im Bulgarischen: Eine Untersuchung zu ihrem Gebrauch in der Umgangssprache [Slavistische Beiträge 130]. Wiesbaden: Sagner.
Rothschild, D.
(2011) Explaining presupposition projection with dynamic semantics. Semantics & Pragmatics, 4(3), 1–43. Crossref link
Russell, B.
(1905) On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. Crossref link
Sapir, E.
(1922) The fundamental elements of Northern Yana. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Linguistics, 13, 215–234.
Sasse, H-J.
(1987) The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511–580. Crossref link
Saussure, L. de. & Oswald, S.
(2009) Argumentation et engagement du locuteur pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 29, 215–243.
Saussure, L. de
(2013) Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 178–189. Crossref link
(2014) Présuppositions discursives, assertion d’arrière-plan et persuasion. In T. Herman & S. Oswald (Éds), Rhétorique et cognition: perspectives théoriques et stratégies persuasives/Rhetoric & Cognition theoretical perspectives and persuasive strategies (pp. 279–311). Berne: Peter Lang.
Sbisà, M.
(2007) Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W.
(1984) Theoretical note: Automatic and controlled processing revisited. Psychological Review, 91(2), 269–276. Crossref link
Schumacher, P. B.
(2012) Context in neurolinguistics: Time-course data from electrophysiology. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer, & P. B. Schumacher (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges (pp. 33–53). Amsterdam: Jonh Benjamins. Crossref link
Schumacher, P. B., & Hung, Y-C.
(2012) Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. Crossref link
Schwarz, F.
(2014) Presuppositions are fast, whether hard or soft – Evidence from the visual world. Proceedings of SALT , 24, 1–22.
Schwarz, F., & Tiemann, S.
(2015) Presupposition projection in online processing. Available at: http://​florianschwarz​.net​/wp​-content​/uploads​/papers​/PresupProjectionProcessing​.pdf.
Schwarz, F.
(2015) Presuppositions vs. Asserted content in online processing. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presupposition. Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (pp. 89–108). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
Searle, J.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge (pp. 344–369). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., & Benešová, E.
(1973) Topic, focus, and generative semantics. Michigan: Scriptor Verlag.
Simone, R., & Lombardi Vallauri, E.
(2010) Natural constraints on language. Nature and consequences. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 63, 205–224.
(2011) Natural constraints on language. The ergonomics of the software. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 64, 119–141.
Simons, M.
(2001) On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.), SALT XI (pp. 431–448). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil, Backwell.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D.
(2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. Crossref link
Stalnaker, R. C.
(1973) Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457. Crossref link
(1974) Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Milton & U. K. Peter (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 471–482). New York: University Press.
(1978) Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Pragmatics 9 (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.
(1999) Context and content: Essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Stoica, P., & Moses, R.
(2005) Spectral analysis of signals. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Stokoe, W. C.
(1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, [Occasional papers, No. 8]. University of Buffalo: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics.
Strawson, P. F.
(1949) Truth. Analysis, 8, 83–97. Crossref link
(1950) On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344. Crossref link
Sturt, P., Sandford, A. J., Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E.
(2004) Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 882–888. Crossref link
Sweller, J.
(2003) Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivations: Advances in research and theory 43 (pp. 215–266). USA: Elsevier Science.
Tallerman, M.
(2007) Did our Ancestors speak a holistic protolanguage? Lingua, 117(3), 579–604. Crossref link
Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., & Luck, S. J.
(2015) How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 997–1009. Crossref link
Thompson, S. A.
(1985) Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text, 5(1/2), 55–84. Crossref link
Tiemann, S., Schmid, M., Bade, N., Rolke, B., Hertrich, I., Ackermann, H.., et al.
(2011) Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data. In I. Reich, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung, Vol. 15 (pp. 581–595). Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.
Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M.
(2003) Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 37–48. Crossref link
Tomlin, R. S.
(1995) Focal attention, voice, and word order: An experimental cross-linguistics study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–554). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Traugott, E. C.
(2006) Grammaticalization, emergent constructions, and the notion of “newness”. Paper presented at HDLS, Albuquerque, Nov. German trans. [to appear] as “Grammatikalisierung und emergente Konstruktionen". In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Kerstin Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik und grammatische Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
(2010) Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–70). Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Trent, N.
(1997) Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Foreign Language Education. Austin, University of Texas.
Vallduví, E.
(1993) Information packaging: A survey. Paper presented at the WOP IS (Word Order, Prosody, and Information Structure), Center for Cognitive Science & Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh.
Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E.
(1996) The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–520. Crossref link
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P.
(2008) The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 580–591. Crossref link
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M. S., Otten, M., & Murre, J.
(2009) Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092–1099. Crossref link
Van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2010) The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad – any implications for neuropragmatics? Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 181–208.
Van der Sandt, R. A.
(1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora. Journal of Semantics, 9, 333–377. Crossref link
Van Oers, B.
(1998) From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488. Crossref link
Van Osstendorp, H., & Kok, I.
(1990) Failing to noticing errors in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 105–113. Crossref link
Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M.
(1990) Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. Crossref link
Vespignani, F., Canal, P., Molinaro, N., Fonda, S., & Cacciari, C.
(2010) Predictive mechanisms in idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1682–1700. Crossref link
Visconti, J.
(2005) On the origins of scalar particles in Italian. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 6(2), 237–261. Crossref link
Walton, D.
(1993) Commitment, types of dialogues, and fallacies. Informal Logic, XIV(2–3), 93–103.
Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., Yang, Y., & Hagoort, P.
(2011) The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 813–820. Crossref link
Wang, L., Jensen, O., Van den Brink, D., Weder, N., Schoffelen, J-M., Magyari, L., Hagoort, P., & Bastiaansen, M.
(2012) Beta oscillations relate to the N400 during language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 33(12), 2898–2912. Crossref link
Wang, L., & Schumacher, P. B.
(2013) New is not always costly: Evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 363. Crossref link
Ward, P., & Sturt, P.
(2007) Linguistic focus and memory: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 73–86. Crossref link
Weil, H.
(1844) De l’ordre des mots dans les langages anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. [En. tr. By Charles William Super as The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages, 1978, Amsterdam, Benjamins].
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J.
(2001) Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. Crossref link
Wetzel, F., & Molfese, D. L.
(1992) The processing of presuppositional information contained in sentences: Electrohpysiological correlates. Brain and Language, 42, 286–307. Crossref link
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M.
(2003) Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for features singletons. Journal pf Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483–502. Crossref link
Wray, A.
(1998) Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language and Communication, 18, 47–67. Crossref link
(2000) Holistic utterances in protolanguage: The link from primates to humans. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & J. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language (pp. 285–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane 53:1  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Langsford, Steven, Rachel G. Stephens, John C. Dunn & Richard L. Lewis
2019. In Search of the Factors Behind Naive Sentence Judgments: A State Trace Analysis of Grammaticality and Acceptability Ratings. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017041493