Article published In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2020) ► pp.107146
Anttila, A. & Kim, J.-B.
(2011) On structural case in Finnish and Korean. Lingua, 1211, 100–127. Special issue on Semantic Aspects of Case Variation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bando, M.
(1996) Semantic properties of -ni NP and -o NP of Japanese psych-verbs. Journal of Language and Culture, 51, 165–177. Osaka: Osaka University.Google Scholar
Beaver, J.
(2011) On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 291, 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. J.
(1994) Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2012) Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S.
(2001) The Mirative and Evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1998) Emergent Grammar. Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language; Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 155–175). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
İşsever, S.
(2003) Information structure in Turkish: the word order-prosody interface. Lingua, 1131, 1025–1053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, K. & Tamura, Y.-S.
(2016) Independent of change or constitutive of change: Event construal of unstable recipient role in prototypical ditransitive events. Proceedings of the High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, 111, 175–197.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B. & Sells, P.
(2010) Oblique case marking on core arguments in Korean. Studies in Language, 341, 602–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-T.
(2009) Event Construal and its Linguistic Encoding: Towards an Extended Semantic Map Model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Reference-point Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics, 81, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001a) Dynamicity in Cognitive Grammar. Axiomathes, 121, 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 121, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.
(2010) The Semantic Bases of Japanese and Korean Ditransitives. Handout of the 20th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, October 1–3, 2010. ([URL]).
Ono, S., Satake, A. & Maeda, K.
(Eds.) (1990) Iwanami Kogo Jiten (revised and expanded ed.) [Iwanami’s classical Japanese dictionary]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Paik, P. J.
(2007) Wegugeo roseo eui hangugeo munbeob sajin: Korean Grammar as a foreign language. Seoul: Hawoo.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
(2003) Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay and Uwe Seibert (Eds.), Motion, Direction, and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (pp. 259–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, Y.
(2007) Shinridoshi no kaku to imiyakuwari no taio-zure: “inyokobun” niokeru meishiku to inyosetsu no imikankei kara [Correspondence and discrepancy between the cases and semantic roles of Psychological verbs: with respect to the semantic relationship between noun phrases and quotative clauses in the “quotative construction”]. Nihon Bungei Kenkyu, 581, 23–39. Nishinomiya: Kwansei Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Fictive motion in language and “ception.” In Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol.11 (pp. 99–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teramura, H.
(1982) Nihongo no Shintakusu to Imi I [Syntax and meaning of Japanese, vol. 1]. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsukamoto, H.
(1991) Nihongo niokeru kakujoshi kotai gensho nitsuite [On the phenomenon of case-particle alternation in Japanese]. The Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Letters, Humanities, 241, 103–127. Matsuyama: Ehime University.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T.
(1985) Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 211, 385–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar