Grammaticalization in progress
Differing patterns of Korean and Japanese plurality
Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its
referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general
plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (
Ioni, Ko
& Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the
manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a
neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g.,
Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and
Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading
and Korean event-plural reading (
Song, 1997).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Specificity and obligatory plural marking
- 3.The Animacy Hierarchy (AH) and grammaticalization
- 4.Different patterns in non-human animate and inanimate nouns
- 4.1Non-human animate nouns
- 4.1.1Korean
- 4.1.2Japanese
- 4.2Inanimate nouns
- 4.2.1Korean
- 4.2.2Japanese
- 4.3Why the differences
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References