Cover not available
Article published In:
Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2023) ► pp.48–75

Grammaticalization in progress

Differing patterns of Korean and Japanese plurality

| Lehigh University
| Rutgers University

Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).

Keywords: plurality, grammaticalization, classifier languages, Korean, Japanese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Specificity and obligatory plural marking
  • 3.The Animacy Hierarchy (AH) and grammaticalization
  • 4.Different patterns in non-human animate and inanimate nouns
    • 4.1Non-human animate nouns
      • 4.1.1Korean
      • 4.1.2Japanese
    • 4.2Inanimate nouns
      • 4.2.1Korean
      • 4.2.2Japanese
    • 4.3Why the differences
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 6 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22001.lee
References (32)
An, Young-Ran
(2008) Korean tul and English all. In Cedric Boecks and S. Ulutas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL4). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 55. MITWPL.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungdai, & Whitman, John
(2020) Korean: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
(1989) Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
(2000) Number. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
(2003) Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela A.
(1996) Numeral Classifier Systems: The case of Japanese. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis-Ratte, Alexander
(2021) On the etymology of the Japanese plural suffix and its possible connection to Korean. Asian languages and linguistics 2–1 1, 24–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
(1972) Numeral classifiers and substantial number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers of Language Universals, 9 1, 1–39. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hudson, Grover
(2008) Essential introductory linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ioni, Tania, Ko, Heejeong, & Wexler, Kenneth
(2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity. Language acquisition, 12 ( 1 ), 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Beom-mo
(2007) Plurality and plural marker ‘deul’. Linguistics, 47 1. 3–31.Google Scholar
Kim, Cheon-taek
(1728) Cheonggu Yeongon [Songs of Green Hills].Google Scholar
Kim, Dong-In
(1934) “On Yi Kwang-su.” Samch’ŏlli. December.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaeshil
(2011) “A micro-parametric approach to plural marking in classified languages.” (paper presented at the 56th annual conference of the international linguistic association. Rutgers University. April 15, 2011).
Kim, Kyumin, & Melchin, Paul B.
(2018) On the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier languages. Lang Linguist Compass, 12 1: e12271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Young-Wha
(2009) The syntax of the Korean plural marker ‑tul and classifiers in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 34 1, 829–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, Young Geun
(1991) P’yocwun Cwungseskwuemunpeplon. [Standard Middle Korean Grammar] Top Publishing.Google Scholar
Kurafuji, Takeo
(2004) Plural morphemes, definiteness, and the notion of semantic parameter. Language and linguistics 5 ( 1 ), 211–242.Google Scholar
Kwak, Eun Joo
(1996) The event dependency of noun phrases. Ph.D. Thesis. Brown University.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
(1976) [1965] The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. Esquisses linguistiques. Volume 21, 38–54. Fink.Google Scholar
Lee, Eunhee, Madigan, Sean, & Park, Mee-Jeong
(2016) An introduction to Korean linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, K-Moon, & Ramsey, Robert
(2011) A history of the Korean language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kiri, Yu Cho, Young-mee, & Park, Min-Young
(2018) Unmarked plurality and specificity in Korean and Japanese plural nouns: A preliminary study. In David G. Hebert (Ed.), International perspectives on translation, education, and innovation in Japanese and Korean societies (pp. 121–132). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, Indra
(2006) Sirens of the western shore. Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murahata, Goro, & Murahata, Yoshiko
(2021) Linguistic multi-competence in the community: the case of a Japanese plural suffix ‑tachi for individuation. Applied linguistics review, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Kimiko, & Tomioka, Satoshi
(2004) Japanese plurals are exceptions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13 1, 113–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko, & Heine, Bernd
(2021) Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nihon Kokugo Daijiten
Dictionary of Japanese national language] [URL] (accessed on 29 November 2021).
Noh, Eunjoo
(2008) A study on the meaning of Korean 0-marked and ‘tul’-marked nouns. Discourse and cognition, 15.1 1, 43–62.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
(1997) The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of pragmatics, 27 1, 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
(2021) Japanese -tachi and generalized associative plurals. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Jenny Doetjes (Eds.), The Handbook of Grammatical Number (pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar