Commentary published In:
Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language: Special issue of the journal of Applied Pragmatics 5:2 (2023)
Edited by Emma Betz, Taiane Malabarba and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Applied Pragmatics 5:2] 2023
► pp. 169173
References
Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
(2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33 (1), 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, D. M. K.
(2018) What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35 (3), 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E.
(2020) Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37 (2), 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C.
(2011) Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
(2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35 (3), 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youn, S. J.
(2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32 (2), 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar