Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language: Special issue of the journal of Applied Pragmatics 5:2 (2023)
Edited by Emma Betz, Taiane Malabarba and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Applied Pragmatics 5:2] 2023
► pp. 121–141
Introduction

Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language

Introduction to the Special Issue

ORCID logo | University of Potsdam
ORCID logo | University of Waterloo

The contributions to this Special Issue employ conversation analysis to illustrate how detailed analysis of language use can lead to the identification of assessable features of second/foreign language Interactional Competence (L2 IC) and the development of institutional testing instruments and practices. L2 IC has been the focus of much research at the intersection of social interaction and second language acquisition. It has also been treated as a construct in the field of language assessment. However, scholars in each research branch have just begun to collaborate systematically. This Special Issue furthers this collaboration, connecting research on L2 IC in diverse learning contexts with practical questions regarding the assessment of individual learners. It adopts a dialogic ‘full paper–commenting paper’ structure: Four empirical papers are each paired with invited commentaries that provide critical discussion and a complementary view of the topics the full papers address. The final discussion papers take a broader perspective on the complex nature of L2 IC and assessment and propose ways to productively move forward. Besides introducing the notion of L2 IC and each individual contribution, this introductory article explains the rationale behind the Special Issue in relation to current research.

Keywords: conversation analysis, interactional competence, language testing, rater training, speaking assessment, second and foreign languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: What is Interactional Competence?
  • 2.Making sense of conduct in interaction: Conversation Analysis and studies of Interactional Competence in a second language
  • 3.Assessing Interactional Competence in a second language: Challenges and opportunities
  • 4.Rationale behind the Special Issue
  • 5.The articles in this Special Issue
  • 6.Final remarks and outlook
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Published online: 7 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00020.mal
References
Abe, M., & Roever, C.
(2019) Interactional Competence in L2 text-chat interactions: First-idea proffering in task openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 144 1, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Task closings in L2 text-chat interactions: A study of L2 Interactional Competence. CALICO Journal, 37 1, 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
(2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33 (1), 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) ‘Hi doctor, give me handouts’: Low-proficiency learners and requests. ELT Journal, 67 (4), 413–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Proficiency and preference organization in second language refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 129 1, 140–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balaman, U. & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2022) Navigating the complex social ecology of screen-based activity in video-mediated interaction. Pragmatics, 32(1), 54–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balaman, U. & Sert, O.
(2017) Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30 (7), 601–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.
(2003) Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20 (1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burch, A. R., & Kley, K.
(2020) Assessing Interactional Competence: The role of intersubjectivity in a paired-speaking assessment task. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9 (1), 25–63.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A.
(2017) What makes a child a good language learner? Interactional Competence, identity, and immersion in a Swedish classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37 1, 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, R.
(2016) Conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, L.
(2009) The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26 (3), 367–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A.
(2020) Lean syntax: How argument structure is adapted to its interactive, material, and temporal ecology. Linguistische Berichte, 263 1, 255–293.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2021) Longitudinal Conversation Analysis: Introduction to the Special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54 (2), 127–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducasse, A., & Brown, A.
(2009) Assessing paired orals: Raters’ orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26 (3), 423–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W.
(2018) Building a semiotic repertoire for social action: Interactional Competence as biographical discovery. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 68–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 285–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galaczi, E. D.
(2008) Peer–peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5 (2), 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Interactional Competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics, 35 (5), 553–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L.
(2018) Interactional Competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15 (3), 219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gan, Z., & Davison, C.
(2011) Gestural behavior in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 94–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gan, Z., Davison, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L.
(2009) Topic negotiation in peer group oral assessment situations: A conversation analytic approach. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 315–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1996) Ethnomethodology’s Program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59 (1), 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, K.
(2009) Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
(2013) Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 149–171). Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greer, T.
(2019) Closing up testing: Interactional orientation to a timer during a paired EFL proficiency test. In H. T. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.) Conversation Analytic Perspectives on English Language Learning, Teaching and Testing in Global Contexts (pp. 159–190). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Using a conversation analytic exemplar-based rubric to assess engagement in a paired EFL test. Journal of School of Languages and Communication, Kobe University, 16 1, 11–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greer, T., & Potter, H.
(2008) Turn-taking practices in multi-party EFL oral proficiency tests. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5 (3), 297–320.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K.
(1993) The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14 1, 145–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16 1, 206–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) A prosaics of interaction. The development of interactional competence in another language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 137–151). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) From L2 Interactional Competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(Eds.) (2011) L2 Interactional Competence and development. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, E.
(2019a) Handling unprepared-for contingencies in an interactional language test: Student initiation of correction as a collaborative accomplishment. In H. T. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.), Conversation analytic perspectives on English language learning, teaching and testing in global contexts (pp. 59–84). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b) The Construction of Interactional Incompetence in L2 Interaction. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 77–121). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, A. W., & Young, R. F.
(1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. F. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–24). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, J.
(2007) The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (1), 83–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Social actions for classroom language learning. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of selfinitiated self-repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53 (2), 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and development (pp. 124–172). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Languaging as competencing: considering language learning as enactment. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 40–56, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hırçın Çoban, M., & Sert, O.
(2020) Resolving interactional troubles and maintaining progressivity in paired speaking assessment in an EFL context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9 (1), 31.Google Scholar
Huth, T.
(2021) Conceptualizing interactional learning targets for the second language curriculum. In S. Kunitz, O. Sert, & N. Markee (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 359–382). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ikeda, N.
(2017) Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatics performance in university settings [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
Jenkins, S., & Parra, I.
(2003) Multiple layers of meaning in an oral proficiency test: The complementaryroles of nonverbal, paralinguistic, and verbal behaviors in assessment decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 90–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Ross, S. J.
(2013) Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In S. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 1–40). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Youn, S. J.
(2018) Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review, 9 (4), 589–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Wagner, J.
(2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, H.
(2018) What constitutes professional communication in aviation: Is language proficiency enough for testing purposes? Language Testing, 35 (3), 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.
(2019) “We limit ten under twenty centu charge okay?”: Routinization of an idiosyncratic multi-word expression. In J. Hellermann, S. Pekarek-Doehler, S. W. Eskildsen, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp. 25–49). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kley, K.
(2019) What counts as evidence for Interactional Competence? Developing rating criteria for a German classroom-based paired speaking test. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 291–321). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konzett-Firth, C.
(2020) Co-adaptation processes in plenary teacher-student talk and the development of L2 Interactional Competence. Classroom Discourse, 11 (3), 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T.
(2013) Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(1986) From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70 (4), 366–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, D.
(2018) What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of Interactional Competence. Language Testing, 35 (3), 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Don’t turn a deaf ear: A case for assessing interactive listening. Applied Linguistics, 42 (4), 740–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampropoulou, L.
(2022) Interactional Competence and the role ‘role play’ plays: The Language Cert perspective. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 4 (1), 32–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Looney, S.
(2022, October 14–15). Assessing grammar for talking: Particles, multiword expressions, and non-lexical Items [Conference presentation]. LANSI, Columbia University.
Malabarba, T.
(2022) Requesting on WhatsApp: The interplay of Interactional Competence and deontics in English as an additional language. TESOL in Context, 30 (2), 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N.
(2016, April 29–May 1). On competence and intersubjective agency: A post-cognitive perspective [Conference presentation]. Teaching and Testing of L2 Interactional Competence, CLIC, Rice University.
(2019) Some theoretical reflections on the construct of Interactional Competence. In M. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 60–76). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
(2004) Classroom talks. An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 491–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., Kunitz, S., & Sert, O.
(2021) Introduction: CA-SLA and the diffusion of innovations. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Pedagogy (pp.1–18). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, L.
(2009) Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater’s perspective. Language Testing, 26 (3), 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Interactional Competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8 (2), 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E.
(2020) Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37 (2), 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. F.
(1997) ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 18 (4), 446–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F.
(2013) The co-construction of conversation in group oral tests. Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F., May, L., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. D.
(2018) Learning oriented feedback in the development and assessment of Interactional Competence. Research Notes, 70 1. [URL]
Nguyen, H. t.
(2012a) Developing Interactional Competence: A conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Social interaction and competence development: Learning the structural organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1 1, 127–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Toward a conversation analytic framework for tracking Interactional Competence development from school to work. In S. Pekarek Doehler, A. Bangerter, G. de Weck, L. Filliettaz, E. González-Martinez, & C. Petitjean (Eds.), Interactional competences in institutional settings: From school to the workplace (pp. 197–225). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Developing Interactional Competence in a lingua franca at the workplace: An ethnomethodologically endogenous account. In H. T. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.), Conversation analytic perspectives on English language learning, teaching and testing in global contexts (pp. 59–84). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. t. & Malabarba, T.
forthcoming). Learning ‘on the shop floor’: The development of Interactional Competence at the workplace by users of English as a foreign language. Routledge.
Okada, Y., & Greer, T.
(2013) Pursuing a relevant response in oral proficiency interview role plays. In S. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 288–310). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patharakorn, P.
(2018) Assessing Interactional Competence in a multiparty roleplay task: A mixed-methods study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. [URL]
Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2018) Elaborations on L2 Interactional Competence: The development of L2 grammar-forinteraction. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) L2 Interactional Competence and L2 education. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based Conversation analytic Research (pp. 417–424). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U.
(2021) The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 54 (2), 183–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. & Berger, E.
(2018) L2 Interactional Competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39 (4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskildsen, S.
(2022) Emergent L2 grammars in and for social interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106 (S1), 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. & Pochon-Berger, E.
(2015) The development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 233–270). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plough, I., Banerjee, J., & Iwashita, N.
(Eds.) (2018a) Special issue on Interactional Competence. Language Testing, 35 (3).Google Scholar
(2018b) Interactional Competence: Genie out of the bottle. Language Testing, 35 (3), 427–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C.
(2018, May 4–5). Assessing interactional competence: Features, scoring, and practicality [Keynote address]. Assessing speaking in context – New trends, Center for Languages & Intercultural Communication, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.
(2022) Teaching and testing second language pragmatics and interaction: A practical guide. Routledge.Google Scholar
Roever, C., & Dai, W.
(2021) Interactional Competence and language testing. In M. R. Salaberry & R. Burch (Eds.), Assessing speaking (pp. 23–49). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
(2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional Competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35 (3), 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S.
(2018) Listener response as a facet of Interactional Competence. Language Testing, 35 (3), 357–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 1, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R., & Kunitz, S.
(Eds.) (2019) Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R., & Burch, R.
(Eds.) (2021) Assessing speaking in context: Expanding the construct and its applications. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sandlund, E., & Greer, T.
(2020) How do raters understand rubrics for assessing L2 interactional engagement? A comparative study of CA- and non-CA-formulated performance descriptors. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9 (1), 128–163.Google Scholar
Sandlund, E., & Sundqvist, P.
(2019) Doing versus assessing Interactional Competence. In M. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence (pp. 357–397). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, T., & McNamara, T.
(2019) What counts in second language oral communication ability? The perspective of linguistic laypersons. Applied Linguistics, 40 (6), 894–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sert, O.
(2015) Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019a) The interplay between collaborative turn sequences and active listenership. Implications for the development of L2 Interactional Competence. In M. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 142–166). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b) Classroom interaction and language teacher education. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 216–238). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Transforming CA findings into future L2 teaching practices: Challenges and prospects for teacher education. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (p. 259–279). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J.
(2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skogmyr Marian, K.
(2021) Initiating a complaint: Change over time in French L2 speakers’ practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54 (2), 163–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023) The development of L2 Interactional Competence; A multimodal study of complaining in French interactions. Routledge.Google Scholar
Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U.
(2018) Second language Interactional Competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12 (8), e12285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vo, S. T.
(2019) Effects of task types on Interactional Competence in oral communication assessment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Iowa State University, United States.
Walters, F. S.
(2021) Some considerations regarding validation in CA-informed oral testing for the L2 classroom. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research (pp. 383–404). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waring, H. Z.
(2018) Developing Interactional Competence with limited resources. In M. R. Salaberry and S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 Interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 215–227). Routledge.Google Scholar
(2021) Harnessing power of heteroglossia: How to multi-task with teacher talk. In S. Kunitz, O. Sert, & N. Markee (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 359–382). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, A.
(2016) Engaging in an interactional routine in EFL classroom: The development of L2 Interactional competence over time. Novitas-ROYAL, 10 (1), 48–70.Google Scholar
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z.
(2010) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youn, S.
(2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32 (2), 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Pragmatic variables in role-play design for the context validity of assessing Interactional Competence. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9 (1), 95–127.Google Scholar
Youn, S., & Burch, R.
(2020) Where conversation analysis meets language assessment: Toward expanding epistemologies and validity evidence. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9 (1), iii–xvii. [URL]
Young, R.
(1999) Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19 1, 105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, R. F.
(2011) Interactional Competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 21, pp. 426–443). Routledge.Google Scholar