This study aims at examining the benefits of teaching L2 pragmatics with the use of tasks. The participants were
50 Catalan/Spanish bilingual students (aged 12–14) from three intact classes who were learners of English as a Foreign Language
and with an upper-intermediate level of proficiency. The three groups followed different approaches to teaching pragmatics: G1 was
instructed in pragmatics following a task-supported approach; G2 was also instructed in pragmatics but no tasks were used; and G3
was a control group with no instruction on pragmatics and no use of tasks, either. To assess pragmatic learning, role-plays were
used both before and after the pedagogical intervention. The pragmatic analysis focused on the speech acts of giving opinion,
agreeing/disagreeing, interrupting, and acknowledging the interlocutor. Results showed that the two instructed groups, regardless
of the type, were more pragmatically competent in the posttest in one of the pragmatic moves (i.e., interrupting). Additionally,
G1 presented statistically significant differences in the posttest when acknowledging the interlocutor. Regarding the control
group, no differences were found in any of the moves. These findings suggest that instruction in general, and task-supported
instruction in particular, has a positive impact on the development of interlanguage pragmatics in a classroom context.
(2018) Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal strategies: Does working memory capacity play a role?Language Teaching Research, Advance online publication.
(2005) Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?System, 331, 417–435.
(2008) Pragmatics in instructed language learning contexts. In E. Alcón & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context (pp. 17–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2015) Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 481, 62–74.
(2018) Effects of task supported language teaching on learners’ use and knowledge of email request mitigators. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based language teaching (Vol. 101, pp. 56–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P.
(Eds.) (2014) Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(1), 68–86.
(2017) Acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 224–245). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Salsbury, T.
(2004) The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 199–227). New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
(1987) Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146.
Cunningham, D. J.
(2016) Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 484–507.
Dastjerdi, H. V., & Rezvani, E.
(2010) The impact of instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ production of requests in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 782–790.
De la Colina, A. A., & García-Mayo, M. D. P.
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. D. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (91–116). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2017) Task-based language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 124–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
(2007) Pragmatic development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 253–286.
Fukuya, Y., & Clark, M.
(2001) A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instructions of mitigators. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp.111–130). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Gass, S. M.
(2017) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2019) Task-based language teaching and L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 338–352). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Long, A. Y., & Solon, M.
(2017) TBLT and L2 pronunciation: Do the benefits of tasks extend beyond grammar and lexis?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 213–224.
Holden, C., & Sykes, J.
(2012) Mentira: Prototyping language-based locative gameplay. In S. Dikkers, J. Marin, & B. Coulter (Eds.), Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for teaching and learning (pp. 111–130). Pittsburg, PA: ETC Press.
(1996) Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 225–252.
(2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 541–577.
(2006) Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 111, 281–314.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom context: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 991, 656–677.
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2016) Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 491, 42–57.
Lambert, C., & Robinson, P.
(2014) Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long classroom study of task sequencing effects. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson, (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 37–71). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
(2016) Task-based versus task-supported language instruction: An experimental study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 205–229.
Long, M. H.
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. H.
(2016) In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
MacWhinney, B. D.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2004) The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: A study based on suggestions. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Universitat Jaume I.
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E.
(2010) The teaching of speech acts in second and foreign language instructional contexts. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (pp. 423–442). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2004) Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434.
(2006) Teaching pragmatics in Spanish L2 courses: What do learners think? In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph Series 11 (pp.109–134). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Qi, X., & Lai, C.
(2017) The effects of deductive instruction and inductive instruction on learners’ development of pragmatic competence in the teaching of Chinese as a second language. System, 701, 26–37.
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.