Cover not available
Article published In:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 4:1 (2022) ► pp.1–32

The roles of language proficiency and study abroad in Japanese students’ receptive pragmatic competence

ORCID logo | Kansai University
ORCID logo | Curtin University

This study investigated the pragmatic competence of 50 Japanese English major students, divided into two groups, one of which participated in a study abroad (SA) program and the other stayed at home (AH) taking regular university classes. Two tests were used to measure two aspects of the students’ pragmatic competence. The Irony Test measured their ability to identify negative and positive irony. The Metapragmatic Test measured their ability to identify inappropriate speech acts and their understanding of why they were inappropriate. Results showed that, compared with a group of native speakers, the students had difficulty in identifying both irony – especially positive irony – and speech act inappropriateness. The students’ language proficiency was related to their metapragmatic ability but not to their ability to detect irony. A comparison of the SA and AH students revealed a small advantage for the former in the Metapragmatic Test but not in the Irony Test.

Keywords: Japanese university students, pragmatic competence, irony, metapragmatic knowledge, study abroad
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Irony
    • 2.2Metapragmatic knowledge
    • 2.3Proficiency and pragmatic comprehension
    • 2.4Study abroad and pragmatic comprehension
    • 2.5Summary and research questions
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instruments
      • 3.2.1Irony test
      • 3.2.2Metapragmatic test
      • 3.2.3TOEFL ITP level 1
      • 3.2.4Study abroad questionnaire
    • 3.3Procedures
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Irony test
    • 4.2Metapragmatic test
    • 4.3Correlations between pragmatic knowledge and proficiency
    • 4.4Influence of studying abroad experience
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.20011.shi
References
Al-Fatlawi, D.
(2018) Online sarcasm and its perception by second language learners; The case of Iraqi learners in Iraq and UK (Unpublished PhD thesis). Lancaster University, UK.
Attardo, S.
(2013) Intentionality and irony. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & B. Alvarado B. (Eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 39–57). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 631, Supplement 1, March, 68–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z.
(1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 321, 233–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouton, L.
(1994) Conversational implicature in the second language: Learned slowly when not deliberatively taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 221, 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Developing nonnative speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 47–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2010) Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals, 431, 80–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E.
(1995) Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 101, 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.
(2010) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behaviour: Perceptions of social situations and strategic usage of request patterns. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2262–2681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(Ed.) (1994) Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Zhu, Y., Shintani, N., & Roever, C.
(2021) A study of Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend irony. Journal of Pragmatics 1721, 7–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 191, 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 31, 41–58.Google Scholar
Isabelli-Garcia, C.
(2010) Acquisition of Spanish agreement in two learning contexts: Study abroad and at home. Foreign Language Annals, 43(2), 289–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C.
(2009) Language learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research. Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumura, S.
(2003) Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 465–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niezgoda, K., & Roever, C.
(2001) Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 63–79). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, L., Segolowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collintine, J.
(2007) Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 291, 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P.
(2008) It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P., & Olinek, K.
(2002) Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 331, 199–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C.
(2014) Testing ESL sociopragmatics development and validation of a web-based test battery. Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., Wang, S., & Brophy, S.
(2014) Learner background factors and learning of second language pragmatics. IRAL, 52(4), 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauer, L., & Ellis, R.
(2019) The social lives of adolescent study abroad learners and their L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 739–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R., Menke, M., & Manzon-Omundson, S.
(2008) Perception of irony by L2 learners of Spanish. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 101–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2005) Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 891, 543–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in EFL. TESOL Quarterly, 411, 313–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in English as a second language. Language Learning, 581, 33–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The effect of L2 proficiency and study abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 611, 904–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Context and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities for study abroad research. Language Teaching, 51(1), 124–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takimoto, M.
(2009) Exploring the effects of input-based treatment and test on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 1029–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, F.
(2015) Adult second language learners’ pragmatic development in the study-abroad context: A review. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 251, 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, J.
(2003) Effects of proficiency and length of residence on the pragmatic comprehension of Japanese learners. Second Language Studies, 22(1), 107–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, J.-S.
(2016) The effectiveness of study-abroad on second language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(1), 66–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar