References
Alcón-Soler, E., & Sánchez-Hernández, A.
(2017) Learning pragmatic routines during study abroad: A focus on type of routine. ATLANTIS: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 39 (2), 191–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2009) Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 59 (4), 755–795. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Recognition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 12 1, 141–162.Google Scholar
(2012) Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research. ARAL, 32 1, 206–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Awareness of meaning of conventional expressions in second language pragmatics. Language Awareness, 23 (1–2), 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Routines in L2 pragmatics research. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 47–62). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Bastos, M.-T., Burghardt, B., Chappetto, E., Nickels, E., & Rose, M.
(2010) The use of conventional expressions and utterance length in L2 pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 12 1, 163–186.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M.-T.
(2011) Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z.
(1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (2), 233–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y.
(2017) The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology, 21 (3), 76–103. 10125/44622Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E.
(2015a) Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL Journal, 6 (3), 499–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19 (3), 324–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Stringer, D.
(2017) Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research, 33 (1), 61–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Su, Y.
(2018) The acquisition of conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource in Chinese as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 102 (4), 732–757. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2021) The effect of learning environment on the selection of conventional expressions on an aural multiple-choice DCT. TESL-EJ, 25 (1). http://​www​.tesl​-ej​.org​/wordpress​/issues​/volume25​/ej97​/ej97a1/
Barron, A.
(2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context. Journal of Pragmatics, 146 1, 87–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D.
(2001) Pragmatics tests: Different purposes, different tests. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 301–326). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, N.
(2011) Designing and analyzing language tests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enochs, K., & Yoshitake-Strain, S.
(1996) Self-assessment and role plays for evaluating appropriateness in speech act realizations. ICU Language Research Bulletin, 11 1, 57–76.Google Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B.
(2000) The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text & Talk, 20 (1), 20 1, 29–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ETS
(2019) Examinee handbook: TOEIC listening and reading. Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Fuchs, R.
(2017) Do women (still) use More intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22 (3), 345–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D.
(1992) A framework for testing cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report 2). University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(1995) Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report 7). University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Köylü, Y.
(2018) Comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15 (3), 373–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.
(2007) Developing a pragmatics test for Chinese EFL learners. Language Testing, 24 (3), 391–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osuka, N.
(2017) Development of pragmatic routines by Japanese learners in a study abroad context. In I. Kecskes & S. Assimakopoulos (Eds.), Current issues in intercultural pragmatics (pp. 275–296). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papageorgiou, S., Wu, S., Hsieh, C., Tannenbaum, R. J., &. Cheng, M.
(2019) Mapping the TOEFL iBT® test scores to China’s standards of English language ability: Implications for score interpretation and use. (Research Report No. TOEFL-RR-89). Educational Testing Service. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C.
(2005) Testing ESL Pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery. Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) What learners get for free: learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal, 66 (1), 10–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., Wang, S., & Brophy, S.
(2014) Learner background factors and learning of second language pragmatics. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52 1, 377–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S-Y., Lee, S. & Lidster, R.
(2021) Examining the effects of different English speech varieties on an L2 academic listening comprehension test at the item level. Language Testing, 38 (4), 580–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in the Honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 371–391). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Roberts, C.
(2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends . American Speech, 80 (3), 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2009) Corpus-informed assessment of comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English. TESOL Quarterly, 43 (4), 738–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Xiao, F.
(2013) Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2 (1), 23–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teng, C., & Fei, F.
(2013) A consciousness-raising approach to pragmatics teaching: Web-based tasks for training study-abroad students. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 4 (1), 50–63.Google Scholar
Yamashita, S. O.
(1996) Six measures of JSL pragmatics. University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar