Article published in:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp. 130159
References

References

Ahmadi-Givi, Hasan, & Anvari, Hasan
(1989) Dastur-e Zaban-e Farsi [Persian grammar]. Tehran: Fatemi publications.Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe
(2008) On the grammaticalization of ‘come’ and ‘go’ into markers of textual connectivity. In Lopez-Couso, Mara Jose, & Elena Seoane (Eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–624). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., & Pagliuca, William
(1987) The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, & Giuliano Bernini (Eds.), Papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics (pp. 107–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Pagliuca, William, & Perkins, Revere D.
(1991) Back to the future. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 19–58). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins Revere, D., & Pagliuca, William
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Osten
(1985) Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Disney, Steve
(2009) The grammaticalisation of ‘be going to’. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 63–79.Google Scholar
Ghafar Samar, Reza, & Yazdanmehr, Elham
(2015) Tahlil-e Gooneh hay-e Vajgani-nahvi-e bayan-e ayandeh dar zaban-e farsi zir-e tasir-e avamel-e ejtemaai [The effect of social factors on lexical and syntactic variation of future marking in Persian]. Language and Linguistics, 8(16), 95–114.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila
(2001) Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal in Linguistics, 46(1–2), 9–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph Harold
(Ed.) (1963) Universals of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1966) Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haghshenas, Ali Mohammad, Samei, Hossein, Samai, Mehdi, & Tabatabai, Alaeddin
(2008) Dastur-e Zaban-e Farsi [Persian Grammar]. Tehran: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
(1990) Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. Paper presented at the Symposium on Explanation in Historical Linguistics, Milwaukee.
(1993) Auxiliaries, cognitive forces, and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 157 ]Heine, Bernd (2003) Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–601). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania
(2003) On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 27(3), 529–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hojatollah Taleghani, Azita
(2006) The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
(1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (Eds.). Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabith C.
(2003) Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jahani, Carina
(2008) Expressions of future in classical and modern new Persian. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, & Donald Stilo (Eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics (pp. 153–175). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania
(2001) Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
(1992) Grammar of contemporary Persian. (Shirley Lyons, Trans.). Costa Mesa, California: Mazda.Google Scholar
Mahootian, Sharzad
(1999) Dastur-e zaban-e Farsi az didgah-e radeshenasi [Persian grammar: A typological approach]. (Mehdi Samai, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.Google Scholar
Naghzguy Kohan, Mehrdad
(2011a) Chegoonegi-e shenasai-e mavared-e dastoory shodegi [How to recognize grammaticisized cases]. Journal of Language and Comparative Literature, 1(2), 149–165.Google Scholar
(2011b) afal-e moin va namayesh nemood dar zaban-e farsi [Modal verbs and aspect marking in Persian]. Literary Research, 14, 93–110.Google Scholar
(2012) Dastoory shodegi-e afal-e harakati dar zaban-e farsi [Grammaticalization of motion verbs in Persian]. In Qodsieh Rezvanian (Ed.), Proceeding of the 6th International conference of the Society for the Spread of Persian Language and Literature (pp. 647–654). Tehran: Book House publications.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
(1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana
(2011) Grammaticalization and linguistic Variation. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 175–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Malvar, Elizabeth
(2007) Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus, 19, 121–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali
(1996) Nothing in context: Variation, grammaticalization and past time marking in Nigerian Pidgin English. In Philip Baker & Anand Syea (Eds). Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages (pp. 71–94). London: University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11, 315–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) African American English in the diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
[ p. 158 ]Roberts, Ian, & Roussou, Anna (2003) Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Jennifer
(2005) Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows [Computer software]. Available from http://​individual​.utoronto​.ca​/tagliamonte​/goldvarb​.html
Schwenter, Scott
(1994) The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language, 18, 71–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
(2010) Frequency as a cause of semantic change. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete, & Kristin Davidse (Eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research (pp. 225–244). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, Durham, Mercedes, & Smith, Jennifer
(2014) Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics, 18(1), 75–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavangar, Manoochehr, & Amouzadeh, Mohammad
(2006) Deictic projection: An inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian. Studia Linguistica, 60(1), 97–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
(2000) Grammaticalization, synchronic variation, and language contact. A study of Spanish progressive -ndo constructions. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, & Brend Heine
(Eds) (1991) Approaches to grammaticalization (volumes 1 & 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vahedi Langrudi, Mohammad
(2002) A syntactic analysis and grammaticalization of simple future, with KHA:STAN in Persian. Journal of Humanities, 2(9), 21–46.Google Scholar
Walker James, Poplack, Shana, & Torres Cacoullos, Rena
(2004) Looking into the future in English and French. Paper presented at Sociolinguistic Symposium 15, Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Windfuhr, Gernot Ludwig
(1979) Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague; Paris; New York: Mouton De Gruyter. Crossref[ p. 159 ]Google Scholar