Article published in:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp. 232–270

Investigating the role of speaker attitudes in koinéisation in Hohhot, China

| University of Canterbury
This paper explores the correlation between speakers’ social attitudes and their linguistic production in a contact-induced dialect mixture in Hohhot, a Chinese immigrant city. In Hohhot, the contact between the community speaking the local Jìn dialect and migrants from all parts of the country has led to the formation of a new vernacular. Thirty-five speakers across three generations from the migrant community were recorded, and their social attitudes in different dimensions were measured through questionnaires. A significant correlation between the speakers’ attitudinal scores and their adoption of a local Jìn feature was found by mixed-effects modelling, and the effects of attitude remained even when speakers’ social contact with Jìn speakers was considered. The findings demonstrate the role of attitudes in contact-induced linguistic change and suggest that speakers’ overt attitudes recorded in questionnaires are also likely to predict their linguistic production.
Keywords: attitudes, koinéisation, dialect contact, migration, China, social networks
Published online: 19 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.16014.wan
References

References

Akay, Emel, & Toraman, Çetin
(2015) Students’ attitudes towards learning English grammar: A study of scale development. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 67–82.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly
(2012) Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Colin
(1992) Attitudes and language. Volume 83. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan, & Sorace, Antonella
(1996) Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, & Bolker, Ben
(2011) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package (Version 1.1-11). Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://​cran​.r​-project​.org.
Bauer, Laurie
(2008) A question of identity: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society, 37(2), 270–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David
(2017) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.26) [Computer program]. Retrieved March 2, 2017, from http://​www​.praat​.org/.
Bohner, Gerd, & Wanke, Michaela
(2002) Attitudes and attitude change. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Borchigud, Wurlig
(1996) Transgressing ethnic and national boundaries: Contemporary “Inner Mongolian” identities in China. In Melissa J. Brown (Ed.), Negotiating ethnicities in China and Taiwan (pp. 160–181). Berkeley: Institute for East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Bortoni-Ricardo, Stella M.
(1985) The urbanization of rural dialect speakers. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David
(1997) Dialect contact, focusing and phonological rule complexity: The koinéisation of Fenland English. In Charles Boberg et al. (Eds.), A selection of papers from NWAVE 25 (University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4), 141–170.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuenren
(1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn, & Trousdale, Graeme
(2013) Using participant observation and social network analysis. In Manfred Krug & Julia Schluter (Eds.), Research methods in language variation and change (pp. 36–52). London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn, & Watson, Kevin
(2016) Phonological leveling, diffusion, and divergence: /t/ lenition in Liverpool and its hinterland. Language Variation and Change, 28(1), 31–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
(2008) The delicate constitution of identity in face-to-face accommodation: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society, 37(2), 267–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davin, Delia
(1999) Internal migration in contemporary China. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunteman, George H.
(1989) Principal component analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series, volume 69. Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Miles, Jeremy, & Field, Zoe
(2012) Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Fox, Susan P.
(2007) The demise of Cockneys?: Language change in London ’s’ traditional’East End. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Gallois, Cindy
(2013) Language attitudes in context. In Howard Giles & Bernadette Watson (Eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect and accent: International perspectives on speech styles (pp. 170–179). New York, USA: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Gallois, Cindy, Cretchley, Julia, & Watson, Bernadette (2012) Methodology in intergroup communication: Eclectic approaches to communicating identity. In Howard Giles (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 31–43). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, & Coupland, Nikolas
(1991) Language: Contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Youpeng
(1990) Putonghua and dialect use in Shiyan City, Hubei. Chinese Language, 219(6), 427–432.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill, Foulkes, Paul, Hughes, Vincent, & Richards, Hazel
(2013) Interaction of social and linguistic constraints on two vowel changes in northern England. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 371–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haug-Hilton, Nanna
(2010) Regional dialect levelling and language standards: Changes in the Hønefoss dialect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Hohhot 3rd National Census Office
(1984) Hohhot census materials from 1949 to 1983.Google Scholar
Hou, Jingyi
(1999) Studies of modern Jìn dialect. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, William
(1993) Sex, death, and hierarchy in a Chinese city: An anthropological account. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Urban Mongols: The flourishing of multiple identities in a vibrant ethnic community. Chinese Sociological Review, 45(3), 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Yingnan
(2008) Modal particles in Hohhot dialect. Modern Science, 20, 180–181.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
(1994) Dialects converging: Rural speech in urban Norway. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Koineization and accommodation. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, & Natali Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 669–702). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, & Williams, Ann
(2000) Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society, 29(1), 65–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore
(2009) The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 41(1), 167–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
(2001) Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans J.
(2000) Language attitudes and sociolinguistic behaviour: Exploring attitude-behaviour relations in language. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 214–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Jiarui
(2012) Personal pronouns “é” and “niá” in Hohhot dialect. Modern Chinese, 4, 35–38.Google Scholar
Li, Wei
(1994) Three generations, two languages, one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Volume 104. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Li, Yuming, & Li, Wei
(2015) The language situation in China, Volume 3. Boston; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Zuonan, & Xin, Shangkui
(1987) Some syntactic features of Hohhot dialect. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2, 101–109.Google Scholar
Liang, Deman
(1985) Current status and outlook of dialects in Dukou, Sichuan. Fangyan, 4, 291–296.Google Scholar
Llamas, Carmen
(2007) “A place between places”: Language and identities in a border town. Language in Society, 36(4), 579–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llamas, Carmen, & Watt, Dominic
(2014) Scottish, English, British?: Innovations in attitude measurement. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(11), 610–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xinyi (2014) A study of the Wanguanzi accent in Qingshan Speech Community of Wuhan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fudan Univeristy, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Ma, Guofan, & Xing, Xiangdong
(1997) Study of l-words in Inner Mongolia Jìn dialects. In Xing Xiangdong & Zhang Yongsheng (Eds.), Study of western Inner Mongolia dialect grammar (pp. 251–262). Hohhot, China: Inner Mongolia People Publishing House.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Robert M.
(2007) A quantitative study of the attitudes of Japanese learners towards varieties of English speech: Aspects of the sociolinguistics of English in Japan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
(2010) The social psychology of English as a global language: Attitudes, awareness and identity in the Japanese context. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
(1980) Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics
(2013) 2010 China Census Materials. Retrieved January 5, 2015, from http://​www​.stats​.gov​.cn​/tjsj​/pcsj​/rkpc​/6rp​/indexch​.htm.
Omdal, Helge
(1977) Høyangermålet – en ny dialekt [The language of Høyanger – a new dialect]. Språklig Samling, 18, 7–9.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Bram A.
(1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Gibbons, Rachel, Suppes, Alexandra, & Krauss, Robert M.
(2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 190–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puthuval, Sarala, & Wang, Xuan
(2017) Hohhot, the language of. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Zev Handel, & James Huang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (pp. 379–386), Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Version 0.98.1103). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved April 26, 2015, from http://​www​.R​-project​.org/.
Redinger, Daniel
(2010) Language attitudes and code-switching behaviour in a multilingual educational context: the case of Luxembourg. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Revelle, William
(2015) Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. R package (Version 1.5.8). Retrieved June 15 2015, from http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=psych.
(2016) How to: Use the psych package for factor analysis and data reduction. Springer. Available from http://​personality​-project​.org​/r​/book/.
Schilling, Michael S.
(2013) Language attitudes of University of Cape Town linguistics students towards codeswitching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The College of William & Mary.Google Scholar
Shen, Ming
(2015) Jìn 晋 dialect. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Zev Handel, & James Huang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Available from CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, Carolyn A., Giles, Howard, & Le Poire, Beth A.
(2001) Communication accommodation theory. In W. Peter Robinson & Howard Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
(1985) Koines and koineization. Language in Society, 14(3), 357–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Pidgins and creoles. In Nancy H. Hornberger & Sandra Lee McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 232–264). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solheim, Randi (2009) Dialect development in a melting pot: The formation of a new culture and a new dialect in the industrial town of Høyanger. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 191–206. Crossref.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre
(2015) Dialect change in South-East Norway and the role of attitude in diffusion. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(5), 612–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Pryce, Gwilym, Timmins, Claire, & Gunter, Barrie
(2013) Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language, 89(3), 501–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Deping
(2011) Language identity and language change: a survey of language use in the Jianghan oilfield. Applied Linguistics, 1, 27–37.Google Scholar
(2012) Koineization: The formation of Jianghan oilfield dialect. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 32(4), 110–116.Google Scholar
Sun, Jingtao
(2006) Fission reduplication in modern Chinese dialects. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 1(1), 109–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
(1986) Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004) New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
(2008) Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society, 37(2), 241–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, Marinus, & Xu, Daming
(2010) Industrialisation and the restructuring of speech community in China and Europe. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, Marinus
(Ed.) (2016) Urbanization, language contact and identity formation [Special issue]. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 26(1).Google Scholar
Wang, Hongjun
(1994) Two common phonetic word-formation in Chinese: Pingding erhua and “l-words” in Taiyuan dialect. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 26, 65–78.Google Scholar
Wang, Ting, & Ding, Hongwei
(2012) Production and perception of nasal coda mergence in Hohhot dialect: From a prosodic point of view. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, Nanjing, China, 1–6.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin, & Clark, Lynn
(2015) Exploring listeners’ real-time reactions to regional accents. Language Awareness, 24(1), 38–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Xiangdong
(1960) “Shèn” and “zǎ” in Inner Mongolian Jìn dialect. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 30, 36–37.Google Scholar
(1995) Grammatical features of Inner Mongolia Jìn dialects. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 1, 52–58.Google Scholar
Xu, Daming
(1992) A sociolinguistic study of Mandarin nasal variation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
(2010) The development of the Baotou speech community: A quantitative study of nasal variation in Mandarin Chinese. In Marinus Van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialisation and the restructuring of speech community in China and Europe (pp. 120–140). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Xu, Tongqiang
(1981) Erhua in Pingding dialect and the so-called “l-words” in Jinzhong dialect. The Chinese Language, 6, 408–415.Google Scholar
Xu, Xiaohui
(2008) Koineization in new town area of Baotou. Unpublished master’s thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L., Abrego-Collier, Carissa, & Sonderegger, Morgan (2013) Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PloS ONE, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar
Zhao, Bingxuan
(1979) “L-words” in Jinzhong dialect. The Chinese Language, 6, 455–458.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaohong
(2005) Nasal rime variation: A reinvestigation of Kundulun District of Baotou after 15 years. Unpublished master’s thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Zhao, Hui
2018. Social meaning in the perception of neutral tone variation in Putonghua . Asia-Pacific Language Variation 4:2 ► pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Hui & Hong Liu
2020. (Standard) language ideology and regional Putonghua in Chinese social media: a view from Weibo. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.