Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 2:1 (2016) ► pp.48–81

Sociotonetics using connected speech

A study of Sui tone variation in free-speech style

| Dartmouth College

This is the first variationist sociotonetic study to use free-speech data for exploring tone. Due to the challenges of analyzing tone in free-speech data, prior work on sociotonetics has been limited to relatively formal speech styles: word lists, sentence frames, and phrase lists. But connected speech styles, including free speech and reading passages, are important for segmental sociophonetics and most other linguistic variables. Will free-speech data always be out of reach for sociotonetics? Can tone variation in connected speech data be normalized and meaningfully analyzed for sociolinguistic research questions? Using field data from the Sui language of China, this paper develops a practical approach for analyzing tone variation in connected speech data, and then applies it to a specific research question about dialect contact in exogamous Sui villages. Results show that some types of intra- and inter-speaker tone variation in connected speech can be effectively analyzed, although other types of tone variables are neutralized in this speech style.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Normalization for variationist purposes
    • 1.2Vowel formant normalization
    • 1.3Tone normalization
    • 1.4Background on the Sui field data study
      • 1.4.1Sui tones
      • 1.4.2The sociolinguistic question for the Sui field data study
  • 2.Normalization methods
    • 2.1Duration
    • 2.2Mean pitch and pitch range
    • 2.3Challenges of measuring tone in connected speech
    • 2.4Testing moving-window normalization methods
    • 2.5Examining the normalization method
  • 3.Results of the Sui field data study
    • 3.1Group analysis
    • 3.2Conversation
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.2.1.02sta
References
Adank, Patti, van Hout, Roeland, & Smits, Roel
(2004) An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1161, 1729–1738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adda-Decker, Martine, & Snoeren, Natalie
(2011) Quantifying temporal speech reduction in French using forced speech alignment. Journal of Phonetics, 391, 261–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, John, Chiou, Jeng-Min, & Evans, Jonathan
(2010) Linguistic pitch analysis using functional principal component mixed effect models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 591, 297–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa
(2013) Prosody. In Mark Jones & Rachel-Anne Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to phonetics (pp. 126–139). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert, Cheung, Kwan-Hin, & Cheung, Pak-Man
(2003) Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 151, 211–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
(1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 131, 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David
(2014) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.82) [Computer program]. Available from: [URL]
Bradley, David
(2007) East and Southeast Asia. In Ronald E. Asher & Christopher Moseley (Eds.), Atlas of the world’s languages (2nd ed.) (pp. 157–208). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, J. Marvin
(1975) The great tone split: Did it work in two opposite ways? In Jimmy Harris & James Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney (pp. 33–48). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Castro, Andy
(2011) Southern Sui: A fourth Sui dialect. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 41, 1–31.Google Scholar
Castro, Andy, & Pan, Xingwen
(2014) Shuiyu diaocha yanjiu [Investigation of the Sui language]. Guiyang, China: Guizhou People’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K.
(1992) Dialect acquisition. Language, 681, 673–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Dynamics of dialect convergence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 61, 117–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R.
(1930) A system of tone letters. La Maitre Phonetique, 451, 24–27.Google Scholar
Chasaide, Ailbhe, & Gobl, Christer
(1993) Contextual variation of the vowel voice source as a function of adjacent consonants. Language and Speech, 361, 303–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.-J., Gopinath, R., Monkowski, M., Picheny, M., & Shen, K.
(1997) New methods in continuous Mandarin speech recognition. Proceedings of the fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Rhodes, Greece, 1543–1546.Google Scholar
Clark, John, & Yallop, Colin
(1995) An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia
(2009) Computational methods for analyzing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass, 31, 1430–1442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, & Hay, Jennifer
(2012) Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 241, 59–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold, Esling, John, Harris, Jimmy, & Wei, James
(2004) A phonetic study of Sui consonants and tones. Mon-Khmer Studies, 341, 47–66.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold, & Solnit, David
(Eds.) (1988) Comparative Kadai: Linguistic studies beyond Tai. Dallas, Texas: SIL.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam, & Warner, Natasha
(2011) An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 391, 253–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Betsy
(2011) Aspects of the acoustic analysis of imitation. In Dennis Preston & Nancy Niedzielski (Eds.), A reader in sociophonetics (pp. 379–391). New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan , Chu, Man-ni, Aston, John, & Su, Chao-yu
(2010) Linguistic and human effects on F0 in a tonal dialect of Qiang. Phonetica, 671, 82–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Nicholas
(2011) Comparing vowel formant normalization procedures. York Papers in Linguistics, 21, 1–28.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen
(1999) A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 31, 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, & Docherty, Gerard
(2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 341, 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, & Kendall, Tyler
(2012) Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English. Lingua, 1221, 779–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria
(1978) Tone: A linguistic survey. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Gerstman, Louis
(1968) Classification of self-normalized vowels. IEEE Transactions of Audio Electroacoustics, AU-161, 78–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Johan’t, Collier, René, & Cohen, Antonie
(1990) A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermes, Dik, & van Gestel, Joost
(1991) The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 901, 97–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine
(2003) Manange tone: Scenarios of retention and loss in two communities. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
(2005) A phonetic analysis of Manange segmental and suprasegmental properties. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 281, 1–36.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie
(1978) Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In Victoria Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 77–111). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John, & Ewan, William
(1979) Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language, 551, 37–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Arthur, & Fairbanks, Grant
(1953) The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 251, 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Jingyuan, & Holt, Lori
(2009) General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1251, 3983–3994. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Evidence for the central origin of lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1291, 1145–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Hank C.-H., & Seide, Frank
(2000) Pitch tracking and tone features for Mandarin speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , Istanbul, Turkey, 1523–1526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E.
(2009) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 31, 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith
(1997) Speech perception without speaker normalization. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–166). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Speaker normalization in speech perception. In David Pisoni & Robert Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 361–389). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2012) Acoustic and auditory phonetics (3rd ed.). Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler & Thomas, Erik
(2010) Vowels: Vowel manipulation, normalization, and plotting in R (software package). Available from: [URL]
Labov, William
(1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. (2nd edition 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
(1972) Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 11, 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles
(2006) The linguistic atlas of North America. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert, & Silverman, Kim
(1984) Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech. Phonetica, 411, 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
(2003) Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leather, Jonathan
(1983) Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 111, 373–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Tan, Lau, Wai, Wong, Y. W., & Ching, P. C.
(2002) Using tone information in Cantonese continuous speech recognition. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Processing, 11, 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lei, Xin
(2006) Modeling lexical tones for Mandarin large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Li, Fang Kuei
(1948) The distribution of initials and tones in the Sui language. Language, 241, 160–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1965) The Tai and Kam-Sui languages. Lingua, 141, 148–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, Lei, & Meng, Xiaolin
(2011) A sociophonetic study on tones of Chongqing Mandarin in gender and age difference. Paper presented at the International Conference of Phonetic Sciences XVII, Hong Kong.
(2013) Chongqing fangyan danzidiaode gongshibianyi [Chongqing dialect synchronic tone variation]. Language and Linguistics, 141, 929–959.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark, & Pierrehumbert, Janet
(1984) Intonational variance under changes in pitch range and length. In Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp. 157–233). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris
(1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 491, 606–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loveday, Leo
(1981) Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech, 241, 71–89.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James
(1970) Glottal dissimilation and the Lahu high-rising tone: A tonogenetic case study. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 901, 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1973) Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Larry Hyman (Ed.), Consonant types and tone (pp. 71–95). Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 1. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
(in press) Writing a linguistic symphony: Analysing variation while doing language documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics..Google Scholar
Miller, James
(1989) Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 851, 2114–2134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miotti, Renzo
(2002) Friulian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 321, 237–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mok, Peggy, Zuo, Donghui, & Wong, Peggy W. Y.
(2013) Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 251, 341–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Corinne, & Jongman, Allard
(1997) Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1021, 1864–1877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nearey, Terrance
(1977) Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
(1989) Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 851, 2088–2113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Hong Quang, Nocera, Pascal, Castelli, Eric, & Trinh, Van Loan
(2008) Tone recognition of Vietnamese continuous speech using Hidden Markov Model. Second International Conference on Communications and Electronics, 235–239. Available from [URL]. DOI: DOI logo
Nolan, Francis
(2003) Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. In Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens, & Joaquin Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (pp. 771–774). Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ohala, John
(1978) Production of tones. In Victoria Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 5–39). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John, & Ewan, W.
(1973) Speed of pitch change [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 531, 345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohara, Yumiko
(1992) Gender-dependent pitch levels: A comparative study in Japanese and English. In Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, & Birch Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 469–477). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Peng, Gang, & Wang, William S.-Y.
(2005) Tone recognition of continuous Cantonese speech based on support vector machines. Speech Communication, 251, 49–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, David
(1997) Some thoughts on 'normalization' in speech perception. In Keith Johnson & John Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9–32). San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert
(2007) Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 111, 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Philip
(1987) Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication, 61, 343–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) How effective are long term mean and standard deviation as normal parameters for tonal fundamental frequency? Speech Communication, 101, 229–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) A linguistic-phonetic acoustic analysis of Shanghai tones. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 131, 185–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) A seven-tone dialect in Southern Thai with super high: Pakphanang tonal acoustics and physiological inferences. In Arthur Abramson (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honour of Vichin Panupong (pp. 191–208). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Rosner, B., & Pickering, J.
(1994) Vowel perception and production. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Elliot, Edmondson, Jerold, & Seibert, Burton G.
(1986) The effect of affect on various acoustic measures of prosody in tone and non-tone languages: A comparison based on computer analysis of voice. Journal of Phonetics, 141, 283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, Kauyumari, Hay, Jennifer, & Nilson, Elissa
(2015) Contextual activation of Australia can affect New Zealanders’ vowel productions. Journal of Phonetics, 481, 76–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, & Blondeau, Hélène
(2007) Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 831, 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shuiyu Diaocha Baogao
[Sui Language Research Report] (1956) Unpublished manuscript, Gui yang, Guizhou, China. Acquired from Jerold Edmondson, University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
(2010) Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James
(2007) Dialect contact and identity: A case study of exogamous Sui clans. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
(2008a) A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change, 201, 409–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Child dialect acquisition: New perspectives on parent/peer influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 121, 567–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) 'Eating the food of our place': Sociolinguistic loyalties in multidialectal Sui villages. Language in Society, 381, 287–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Clan as a sociolinguistic variable. In James Stanford & Dennis Preston (Eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages (pp. 463–484). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) A 50-year comparison of regional dialect variation in the Sui language. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 41, 120–143.Google Scholar
Sundberg, Johan
(1973) Data on maximum speed of pitch changes. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Reports, 41, 39–47.Google Scholar
(1979) Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 71–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik
(2002) Instrumental phonetics. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, & Natalie Schil ling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 168–200). Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2010) A longitudinal analysis of the durability of the Northern-Midland dialect boundary in Ohio. American Speech, 851, 375–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Sociophonetics: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik, & Kendall, Tyler
(2007) NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available from [URL]
Tingsabadh, Kalaya M.R., & Deeprasert, Daranee
(1997) Tones in Standard Thai Connected Speech. In Arthur Abramson (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies: In honor of Vichin Panupong (pp. 297–308). Chulalongkorn University Press. Available from [URL]
Tran, Do-Dat, Castelli, Eric, Serignat, Jean-Francois, Trinh, Van Loan, & Le, Xuan Hung
(2005) Influence of F0 on Vietnamese syllable perception. INTERSPEECH, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2005.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut, & Eriksson, Anders
(1995) The perceptual evaluation of F0 excursions in speech as evidenced by liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 1905–1915. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
(1986) Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Niekerk, Daniel, & Barnard, Etienne
(2014) Predicting utterance pitch targets in Yoruba for tone realization in speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 561, 229–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, Robert, Strange, Winifred, Shankweiler, Donald, & Edman, Thomas
(1976) What information enables a listener to map a talker’s vowel space? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 601, 198–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic, & Fabricius, Anne
(2002) Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1~F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 91, 159–173.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt
(1986) Language variation in the United States. In O. L. Taylor (Ed.), Nature of communication disorders in culturally and linguistically diverse populations (pp. 73–115). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie
(2006) American English: Dialects and variation (2nd ed.). Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wong, Patrick C. M., & Diehl, Randy L.
(2003) Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 461, 413–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Richard, & Shryock, Aaron
(1993) The effects of pitch on implosives in SiSwati. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 231, 16–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xia, Yongliang
(1988/2008) Duyunshi Yanghexiang Pandong Shuiyu diaocha [Duyun city Yanghe village Pandong Sui language investigation]. In Yongqu Liang (Ed.), Guizhou Liushanliushui Minzu Diaocha Ziliao Xuanbian [Selections from Guizhou Nationalities Investigations] (pp. 254–265). Guiyang, China: Guizhou Nationalities Publishing.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi
(1994) Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 951, 2240–2253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 61–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 271, 55–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Sources of tonal variations in connected speech. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 171, 1–31.Google Scholar
(2004) Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics, 51, 757–797.Google Scholar
(2005) Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 461, 220–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Tone in connected discourse. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 742–750). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Yi, & Sun Xuejing
(2002) Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1111, 1399–1413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Yi, & Wang, Q. Emily
(2001) Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 331, 319–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, & Fagyal, Zsuzsanna
(2011) Anayzing prosody: Best practices for the analysis of prosody. In Marianna Di Paolo & Malcah Yaeger-Dror (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A student’s guide (pp. 119–130). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
(2002) Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, Patricia
(2008) Culture and gender of voice pitch: A sociophonetic comparison of the Japanese and Americans. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zeng, Xiaoyu, & Yao, Fuxiang
(1996) Han-Shui cidian [Chinese-Sui dictionary]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minorities Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhang, Junru
(1980) Shuiyu jianzhi [A sketch of the Sui language]. Beijing: Minorities Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Jian-lai, Tian, Ye, Shi, Yu, Huang, Chao, & Chang, Eric
(2004) Tone articulation modeling for Mandarin spontaneous speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1, 997–1000.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong Sean
(1999) Shanghai tonetics. Munich; Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Kuo, Jennifer
2018. A large-scale smartphone-based sociophonetic study of Taiwan Mandarin. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 4:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Nagy, Naomi, Holman Tse & James N. Stanford
2024. Have Cantonese Tones Merged in Spontaneous Speech?. In The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages, ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Hua Gao & Yuhan Lin
2023. A prosodic comparison of two types of response tokens in Mandarin Chinese and English. Lingua 283 ► pp. 103466 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Cathryn
2022. The phonetic tone change *high > rising. Diachronica 39:2 ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Cathryn, James N. Stanford, Yang Liu, Jinjing Jiang & Liufang Tang
2019. Variation in the tonal space of Yangliu Lalo, an endangered language of Yunnan, China. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Cathryn, James N. Stanford, Chunxia Luo & Naluo Zhang
2022. Generational differences in the low tones of Black Lahu. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s5 ► pp. 759 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Alan C. L., Crystal W. T. Lee, Chen Lan & Peggy P. K. Mok
2022. A New System of Cantonese Tones? Tone Perception and Production in Hong Kong South Asian Cantonese. Language and Speech 65:3 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Jingwei
2019. Tone mergers in Cantonese. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Sociophonetics and Its Methods. In Sociophonetics, ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.