Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 8:1 (2022) ► pp.1–31

Intergenerational changes in Gurindji Kriol

Comparing apparent-time and real-time data

 | University of Queensland
 | University of Queensland
 | University of Queensland | Karungkarni Art and Culture Aboriginal Corporation
This paper explores intergenerational changes in Gurindji Kriol, in order to determine whether differences between adults and children are the result of an abrupt generational shift or an extended acquisition process. We analyse the production of Gurindji in the speech of five age groups of Gurindji Kriol speakers, using a set of 176 picture-prompt narratives from 70 different speakers. The data is analysed both synchronically (in apparent-time) and diachronically (in real-time). The synchronic snapshot of the data reveals that adults use significantly more Gurindji than children which can be interpreted as a generational shift towards Kriol. Nonetheless the real-time data shows that most children increase their use of Gurindji as they age which suggests an extended acquisition of Gurindji. Although contradictory on the surface, this study argues that these processes are occurring in tandem, with the extended acquisition of Gurindji by children slowing down the intergenerational shift towards Kriol.
Keywords: language change, acquisition, Gurindji Kriol, mixed languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language change in the Gurindji community
    • 2.1The origins of Gurindji Kriol
    • 2.2The source languages of Gurindji Kriol
      • 2.2.1Gurindji
      • 2.2.2Kriol
    • 2.3Structure of Gurindji Kriol
    • 2.4Previous intergenerational studies of Gurindji Kriol
      • 2.4.1Changes to the spatial relations system
      • 2.4.2Changes in case marking strategies
      • 2.4.3Changes in lexical comprehension
    • 2.5Perspectives on intergenerational changes to Gurindji Kriol
  • 3.Inter-generational differences in the use of nouns and verbs
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2Elicitation materials
    • 3.3Datasets
      • 3.3.1Apparent-time data
      • 3.3.2Real-time data
      • 3.3.3Child-directed data
    • 3.4Results
      • 3.4.1Apparent time data
      • 3.4.2Real time data
      • 3.4.3Child-directed data
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Extended acquisition or generational shift?
    • 4.2Understanding shifts towards Kriol and Gurindji
    • 4.3Differences between noun and verb production
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.21001.slo
References (53)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., & Dixon, R. M. W. (2007). Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori (1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change, 3 1, 241–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter (2015). Typology of mixed languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 217–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brand, James, Hay, Jen, Clark, Lynne, Watson, Kevin, & Sóskuthy, Márton (forthcoming). Systematic co-variation of monophthongs across speakers of New Zealand English. Journal of Phonetics. DOI logo
Bromham, Lindell, Hua, Xia, Algy, Cassandra, & Meakins, Felicity (2020). Indigenous language endangerment: A multidimensional analysis of risk factors. Journal of Language Evolution, 5 (1), 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charola, Erika, & Meakins, Felecity (Eds.). (2016). Yijarni: True stories from Gurindji Country. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, C. (1992). Space stimuli kit 1.2. In. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Dickson, Gregory (2015). Marra and Kriol: The loss and maintenance of knowledge across a language shift boundary. Doctororal dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
Dunn, Vivien, Meakins, Felicity, & Algy, Cassandra (2021). Acquisition or shift: Interpreting variation in Gurindji children’s expression of spatial relations. In Enoch Aboh & Cécile Vigouroux (Eds.), Variation rolls the dice (pp. 103–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Frank (1968). The unlucky Australians. Melbourne: Nelson.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26 (2), 210–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hua, Xia, Meakins, Felicity, Algy, Cassandra, & Bromham, Lindell (2021). Language change in multidimensional space: New methods for modelling linguistic coherence. Language Dynamics and Change. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Marian, & Moro, Francesca (2020). What is “natural” speech? Comparing free narratives and Frog stories in Indonesia. Language Documentation and Conservation, 14 1, 238–313.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19 (3), 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marschner, Ian (2011). glm2: Fitting generalized linear models with convergence problems. The R Journal, 3 (2), 12–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron (2009). Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Mercer (1994 [1969]). Frog, where are you? China: Puffin.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick (1988). Mix-im-up: Aboriginal codeswitching old and new. In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 97–124). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Understanding language shift: A step towards language maintenance. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), Language in Australia (pp. 143–156). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick, & Meakins, Felicity (2005). Gurindji Kriol: A mixed language emerges from code-switching. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25 (1), 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity (2008a). Land, language and identity: The socio-political origins of Gurindji Kriol. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Noami Nagy (Eds.), Social lives in language (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). Unravelling languages: Multilingualism and language contact in Kalkaringi. In Jane Simpson & Gillian Wigglesworth (Eds.), Children’s language and Multilingualism: Indigenous language use at home and school (pp. 283–302). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2009). The case of the shifty ergative marker: A pragmatic shift in the ergative marker in one Australian mixed language. In Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana Chelliah (Eds.), The role of semantics and pragmatics in the development of case (pp. 59–91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Spaced out: Inter-generational changes in the expression of spatial relations by Gurindji people. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 31 (1), 43–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). From absolutely optional to only nominally ergative: The life cycle of the Gurindji Kriol ergative suffix. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev, & Nino Amiridze (Eds.), Borrowed morphology (pp. 189–218). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Mixed languages. In Mark Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of Linguistics (pp.1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & Algy, Cassandra (2016). Deadly reckoning: Changes in Gurindji children’s knowledge of cardinals. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36 (4), 479–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Algy, Cassandra, & Wilmoth, Sasha (2021). Gurindji Kriol corpus. PARADISEC.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Green, Jennifer, & Turpin, Myfany (2018). Understanding linguistic fieldwork. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Hua, Xia, Algy, Cassandra, & Bromham, Lindell (2019). The birth of a new language does not favour simplification. Language, 95 (2), 294–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & McConvell, Patrick (2021). A Grammar of Gurindji, a Ngumpin-Yapa language of Australia as spoken by Violet Wadrill, Ronnie Wavehill, Dandy Danbayarri, Biddy Wavehill, Topsy Dodd Ngarnjal, Long Johnny Kijngayarri, Banjo Ryan, Pincher Nyurrmiari and Blanche Bulngari. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & O’Shannessy, Carmel (2010). Ordering arguments about: Word order and discourse motivations in the development and use of the ergative marker in two Australian mixed languages. Lingua, 120 (7), 1693–1713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Pensalfini, Rob, Zipf, Caitlin, & Hamilton-Hollaway, Amanda (2020). Lend me your verbs: Verb borrowing between Jingulu and Mudburra. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 40 (3), 296–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & Wigglesworth, Gillian (2013). How much input is enough? Correlating comprehension and child language input in an endangered language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34 (2), 171–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & Wilmoth, Sasha (2020). Overabundance resulting from language contact: Complex cell-mates in Gurindji Kriol. In Peter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (Eds.), The complexities of morphology (pp. 81–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam (2011). Introducing sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, Jennifer (2011). Roper River Aboriginal language features in Australian Kriol: Considering semantic features. In Claire Lefebvre (Ed.), Creoles, their substrates, and language typology (pp. 461–487). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter (1981). Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Arnold Highfield & Albert Valdman (Eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies (pp. 52–78). Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, & Mannila, Heikki (2011). The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change, 23 (1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Shannessy, Carmel (2004). The monster stories: Picture stimulii to elicit lexical subject NPs. Nijmegen, Holland: Max-Planck-Institut-für-Psycholinguistik.Google Scholar
O’Shannessy, Carmel, & Meakins, Felicity (2012). Comprehension of competing argument marking systems in two Australian mixed languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (2), 378–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandefur, John (1979). An Australian creole in the northern territory: A Description of Ngukurr-Bamyili dialects (Part 1). Darwin: SIL.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gilian, & Blondeau, Hélène (2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83 (3), 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Meakins, Felicity, & Angelo, Denise (2013). Kriol. In Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages, volume 1 1, (pp. 241–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra (1982). On some ‘redundant compounds’ in Modern Hindi. Lingua, 56 (3–4), 345–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, volume 2 1, (pp. 219–257). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan, & Berman, Ruth (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Uri (2009). Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 55–75). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., & Kaufman, Terrence (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Bos, Jackie, Meakins, Felicity, & Algy, Cassandra (2017). Searching for “Agent Zero”: The origins of a relative case. Language Ecology, 1 (1), 4–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Charlie (2016). A handful of sand. Melbourne: Monash University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, Cathleen, & Tagliamonte, Sali (2017). Is one innovation enough? Leaders, covariation, and language change. American Speech, 92 (1), 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar