Cover not available
Review published In:
Genre and Disciplinarity
Edited by Tim Moore, Janne Morton and Steve Price
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:2] 2018
► pp. 234–239
Book review

Ursula Wingate, Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice

Reviewed by
| Swinburne University of Technology
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.00012.pri
References
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Freadman, A.
(1994) ‘Anyone for Tennis?’ In A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds), Genre and the New rhetoric (pp. 43–66). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
(2012) The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics 33(5), 544–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) On communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lea, M.
(2005) ‘Communities of practice’ in higher education; useful heuristic or educational model?. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 180–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, C.
(1994) Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–78). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1986) Introduction. In B. Schieffelin and E. Ochs (eds) Language Socialisation across Cultures (pp. 1–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, P.
(1998) Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B.
(Ed.) (2003) Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar