Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (1987) ► pp. 119
References

References

Aarts, J. and W. Meijs
(1984) Corpus linguistics: recent developments in the use of computer corpora in English language research. Amsterdam, Rodopi.Google Scholar
(eds.) (1986) Corpus linguistics II: new studies in the analysis and exploitation of computer corpora. Amsterdam, Rodopi.Aijmer, K. (1987) Oh and ah in English conversation. In Meijs (ed.) (1987): 61–86.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B.
(1987) Prosodic patterns in spoken English: studies in the correlation between prosody and grammar for text-to-speech conversation. Lund Studies in English 76. Lund, Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Atwell, E.
(1983) Constituent likelihood grammar. ICAME News 7:34–67. Norwegian Computing Centre for Humanities.Google Scholar
Atwell, E., G. Leech and R. Garside
(1984) Analysis of the LOB Corpus: progress and prospects. In Aarts and Meijs (1984): 41–52.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1985) Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi-feature/multi-dimensional analyses. Linguistics 32,2:337–60.Google Scholar
forthcoming) Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62:384–414. Crossref
Briscoe, T., I. Craig and C. Clover
(1987) The use of the LOB Corpus in the development of a phrase structure grammar of English. In Meijs (1987): 207–218.Google Scholar
Coates, J.
(1983) The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London and Canberra, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, P.C.
(1985) Th-clefts and all-clefts. Beiträge zur Phonetik und Linguistik 4:45–53.Google Scholar
(1987) Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English spoken and written discourse. ICAME Journal 11:5–17.Google Scholar
Collins, P.C. and P. Peters
(forthcoming) The Australian Corpus Project. In Ihalainen, O., M. Kytö and M. Rissanen (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Amsterdam, Rodopi (to appear).Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M. and J. Svartvik
(1984) Four-level tagging of spoken English. In Aarts and Meijs (1984): 53–64.Google Scholar
Ellegärd, A.
(1978) The syntactic structure of English texts: a computer based study of four kinds of text in the Brown University Corpus. (Gothenburg Studies in English, 43), Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Fjelkestan-Nilsson, B.
(1983) ALSO and TOO: a corpus-based study of their frequency and use in Modern English. Stockholm, Stockholm Studies in English, LVIII.Google Scholar
Francis, W.N.
(1980) A tagged corpus – problems and prospects. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (eds.) Studies in English linguistics: for Randolph Quirk. London, Longman: 192–209.Google Scholar
(1982) Problems of assembling and computerizing large corpora. In Johansson (1982): 7–24.Google Scholar
Francis, W.N. and H. Kučera
(1964) Manual of information to accompany a standard corpus of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computers. Providence, R.I., Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar
(1982) Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Garside, R. and G.N. Leech
(1982) Grammatical tagging of the LOB Corpus: general survey. In Johansson (1982): 110–117.Google Scholar
Geens, D.
(1975/6) Analysis of present-day English theatrical language 1966-72. Leuven, K.U.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. and R. Quirk
(1970) Elicitatlon experiments in English: linguistic studies in use and attitude. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Greene, B.B. and G.M. Rubin
(1971) Automatic grammatical tagging of English. Providence, R.I., Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar
Hofland, K. and S. Johansson
(1982) Word frequencies in British and American English. Bergen, Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, O., M. Kytö and M. Rissanen
(1987) The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: diachronic and dialectal report on work in progress. In Meijs (1987): 21–32.Google Scholar
Johansson, S.
(ed.) (1982) Computer corpora in English language research. Bergen, Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Johansson, S., G. Leech and H. Goodluck
(1978) Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. Oslo, Department of English, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. and M.C. Jahr
(1982) Grammatical tagging of the LOB: predicting word class from word endings. In Johansson (1982): 118–146.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. and E.H. Norheim
(1988) The subjunctive in British and American English. ICAME Journal 12:56–57.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. and K. Hofland
forthcoming) Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar.
Kaye, G.
(1988) The design of the database for the Survey of English Usage. ICAME Journal 12:56–57.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
(1986) ‘The lesser man’: Observations on the role of women in modern English writings. In Aarts and Meijs (1986): 163–176.Google Scholar
Leech, G., R. Garslde and E. Atwell
(1983a) The automatic grammatical tagging of the LOB Corpus. ICAME News 7:13–33.Google Scholar
Leech, G. R. Garside and E. Atwell
(1983b) Recent developments in the use of computer corpora in English Language research. Transactions of the Philological Society: 23–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. and A. Beale
(1985) Computers in English language research. Language Teaching 17,3:216–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, I.
(1938) Choice of grammatical word-class without global syntactic analysis: tagging words in the LOB Corpus. Computers and the Humanities 17,3:139–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R.
(1984) Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (ed.) Language studies: children writing. Geelong, Victoria, Deakin University Press: 21–30.Google Scholar
Meijs, W.
(ed.) (1987) Corpus linguistics and beyond. Amsterdam, Rodopi.Google Scholar
Oddy, R.N., S.E. Robertson, C.J. van Rigsbergen and P.W. Williams
(eds.) (1981) Information retrieval research. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, N.
(1988) A corpus for studying linguistic variation. ICAME Journal 12:3–14.Google Scholar
Peters, P.
(1987) Towards a corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 11:27–38.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. and J. Svarvik
(1966) Investigating linguistic acceptability. The Hague, Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G.
(1987) Evidence against the ‘grammatical/ungrammatical’ distinction. In Meijs (1987): 219–226.Google Scholar
Shastri, S.V.
(1980) A computer corpus of present-day Indian English. ICAME News 4:9–12.Google Scholar
(1985) Word frequencies in Indian English: a preliminary report. ICAME News 9:38–44.Google Scholar
(1988) The Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English and work done on its basis so far. ICAME Journal 12:15–26.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.McH.
(1982) Reflections on computer corpora in English language research. InJohansson (1982): 1–6.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J.
(1984) Text Segmentation for Speech (TESS): presentation of a project. Survey of Spoken English, Lund University.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J., M. Eeg-Olofsson, O. Forsheden, B. Orestrom and C. Thavenius
(eds.) (1982) A Survey of Spoken English: report on research 1975-81. Lund, Gleerup.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. and M. Eeg-Olofsson
(1982) Tagging the London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. In Johansson (1982): 85–109.Google Scholar
Svartvik J. and R. Quirk
(eds.) (1980) A corpus of English conversation. Lund, Gleerup/Liber.Google Scholar
Thavenius, C.
(1982) Exophora in English conversation. In N.E. Enkvist (ed.) (1982) Impromptu speech: a symposium. Åbo, Åbo Akademi: 291–305.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., B. Altenberg and L. Hermeràn
(1983) English in speech and writing. ETOS Report 1. Lund and Uppsala: the Departments of English and the Universities of Lund and Uppsala.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Altenberg, Bengt
1991.  In English Computer Corpora, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.