Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (1987) ► pp. 7697


Age, The
16. April 1986.
Allport, G.W.
(1954) The nature of prejudice. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Apeltauer, E.
(1977) Elemente und Verlaufsformen von Streitgesprächen. Doctoral Thesis, Münster.Google Scholar
Belle, W. van and P. Claes
(1985) The logic of deterrence: a semiotic and psychoanalytical approach. In Chilton (ed.) (1985a): 91–102.Google Scholar
Berning, C.
(1964) Vom Abstammungsnachweis zum Zuchtwart. Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bork, S.
(1970) Miβbrauch der Sprache. Bern, Francke.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.) Question and politeness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 56–289.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, H.
(1984) Der Atomschocker. Sprachdienst 28:65–72.Google Scholar
Chilton, P.
(ed.) (1985a) Language and the nuclear arms debate. London, Pinter.Google Scholar
(1985b) Words, discourse and metaphors: the meanings of deterrent and deterrence. In Chilton (ed.) (1985a): 103–127.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1979) Language and responsibility. New York, Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, M.
(1984) Language and society in the German-speaking countries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crispin, A.
(ed.) (1982) Nukespeak: the media and the bomb. London, Comedia.Google Scholar
Dabke, R.
(1975) Swearing in Australian Rules Football. Paper delivered at conference of Sport, Society and Personality. La Trobe University.
Dahl, J.
(1977) Kommt Rat, kommt Unrat. Scheideweg 7:39–62.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N., P. Schlobinsky and I. Wachs
(1986) Berlinlsch. Berlin, Spitz.Google Scholar
(1972) Reohtsschreibung. Leipzig, Bibliographischer Verlag.Google Scholar
(1973) Rechtsschreibung. Mannheim, Bibliographischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Easlea, B.
(1983) Fathering the unthinkable. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. and T. Marshall
(1985) The war against peacemongering: language and ideology. In Chilton (ed.) (1985a): 3–22.Google Scholar
Franck, T.M. and E. Weisband
(1972) Word politics: verbal strategy among the superpowers. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gründler, H.
(1982) Kernenergiewerbung. In H.J. Heringer (ed.) Holzfeuer im hölzernen Ofen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr: 203–15.Google Scholar
Hall, R.V.
(1981) Racism and the press. In F.S. Stevens (ed.) Racism: the Australian experience. Sydney, ANZ Book Co.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. and C. Husband
(1974) Racism and the mass media. London, Davis Poynter.Google Scholar
Hayden, W.
(1986a) Aspects of Australian foreign policy. Australian Foreign Policy Record 57:46–8.Google Scholar
(1986b) Conference on disarmament: Australia. Australian Foreign Policy Record 57:49–52.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, F.
(1985) Kriegssprache. Psychologle und Gesellschaftskritik. H.1/2:7–22.Google Scholar
Hook, G.D.
(1984) The nuclearization of language: nuclear allergy as political metaphor. Journal of Peace Research 21:259–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Making nuclear weapons easier to live with: the political role of languages in nuclearization. Bulletin of Peace Proposals 16,1:67–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaehrling, S. and C. Doblin
(1987) Lexical and semantic features of nuclear energy discourse in the publications, “Frankfurter Allgemeine” und “Der Spiegel”. Unpublished semester paper, Monash University, Department of German.Google Scholar
Jones, J.S.
(1981) How different are human races? Nature 193:187–90.Google Scholar
Kasper, G.
(1981) Pragmatik in der Interimsprache. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and B. Hodge
(1979) Language as ideology. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moss, P.
(1985) Rhetoric of defence in the United States: language, myth and ideology. In Chilton (ed.) (1985a): 45.Google Scholar
Neues Deutschland
16.7.86; 17.7.86; 18.7.86.
Pasierbsky, F.
(1983) Krieg und Frieden in der Sprache. München, Fischer.Google Scholar
Rehbein, J.
(1972) Entschuldigungen und Rechtfertigungen. In D. Wunderllch (ed.) Linguistische Pragmatik. Frankfurt, Athenäum: 288–317.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1985) Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Richardson, K.
(1985) Pragmatics of speeches against the peace movement: Britain, a case study. In Chilton (ed.) (1985a): 32–44.Google Scholar
Scbäffer, C.
(1986) Probleme der Bedeutungsschreibung des ideologierelevanten Wortschatzes. Linguistische Studien A, 146. Berlin, Akademie der Wissenchaften der DDR.Google Scholar
Seidel, E. and I. Seidel-Slotty
(1961) Sprachwandel im dritten Reich. Halle, Sprache und Literatur.Google Scholar
Taylor, B.A.
(1976) Towards a social linguistic analysis of swearing and the language of abuse in Australian English. In M. Clyne (ed.) Australia talks. Canberra, Pacific Linguistics: 43–62.Google Scholar
Townson, M.
(1983) Nuclear neologisms. In C.V.J. Russ (ed.) Foreign influences on German. Dundee, Lochee: 88–108.Google Scholar
Troyna, B.
(1981) Public awareness and the media. London, Commission for Racial Equality.Google Scholar
Vallentine, J.
(1986) Chernobyl disaster. Parliamentary debate. Backgrounder 523: iv.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.
(1982) When majorities talk about minorities. Research report. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdan.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
(1966) Linguistik der Lüge. Heidelberg, Schneider.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.L.
(1956) Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Agyekum, Kofi
2004. Invective language in contemporary Ghanaian politics. Journal of Language and Politics 3:2  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo
Sharifian, Farzad & Roland Sussex
2010. Michael George Clyne (1939–2010): scholar and champion of languages. Current Issues in Language Planning 11:4  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.