Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (1988) ► pp. 22–33

The Australian corpus project

Findings on the distribution of some functional variants in the Australian press

| Macquarie University, University of New South Wales
| Macquarie University, University of New South Wales
| Macquarie University, University of New South Wales
The functional variants of International English are often differently distributed in the different regional standards. With evidence from the corpus of Australian English, this has already been shown for lexical variants such as will/shall, maybe/perhaps etc. In this paper evidence from the Australian corpus is used to discuss a number of variables ina) morphologyb) the system of conjunctionc) the system of quantifiers.The redistribution of morphological variants-edl-t (as in burned/burnt), and -wards(s) (as in downward(s)) showed a tendency to assign different grammatical roles to each variant. Among the conjunctions, apart from individual differences the most interesting finding was the higher level overall in the use of subordinating conjunctions, when Australian newspaper data was compared with the equivalent in Britain or America. A possible explanation for this invokes the Hallidayan principle that subordination is actually more common in speech than in writing. The suggestion is that Australian press reporting approximates more closely to spoken than to written norms of language. But on the quantifiers a few/several the corpus provides no support for a new popular use of several, to mean vaguely large number.
Published online: 01 January 1988
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.11.1.03pet
References
Bauer, L.
(1987) New Zealand English morphology: some experimental evidence. Te Reo 301:37–53.Google Scholar
Blair, D.
(1985) Dictionaries and the credibility gap: informant responses to some English quantifiers. In J. E. Clark (ed.) The cultivated Australian: Festschrift in honour of Arthur Delbridge. Hamburg, Burske: 221–229.Google Scholar
Collins, P. and P. Peters
(1987) The Australian corpus project. In Corpus linguistics, hard and soft: proceedings of the Eighth ICAME Conference, Helsinki. Amsterdam, Rodopi: 103–120.Google Scholar
Fowler’s Modem English Usage
(1968) Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. and H. Kucera
(1982) Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1985a) Spoken and written language. Geelong, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
(1985b) An introduction to functional grammar. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hofland, K. and S. Johansson
(1982) Word frequencies in British and American English. Bergen, Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D.
(1977) Lexicographic notes on English quantifiers. In Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 131,372–83.Google Scholar
Peters, P.
(1986) Style in Australia: current practices in spelling, hyphenation, punctuation, capitalization etc. Sydney, Macquarie University Dictionary Research Centre.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik
(1972) A grammar of contemporary English. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, R. N. and W. J. Frawley
(1983) Conjunctive cohesion in four English genres. Text 3,4:347–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zettersten, A.
(1978) A word frequency list based on American press reportage. Copenhagen, Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & S. Arulmozi
2018.  In History, Features, and Typology of Language Corpora, ► pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Nelson, Gerald
2019.  In The Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 523 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Pam & Margery Fee
1989. New configurations: The balance of British and American English features in Australian and Canadian English∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Romaine, Suzanne
1999.  In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 01 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.