Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 15:2 (1992) ► pp.4562
References
Allwright, D. and K. M. Bailey
(1991) Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allwright, R.L. M.-P. Woodley, & J.M. Allwright
(1988) Investigating reformulations as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics 9, 3:236–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burt, M.K. & C. Kiparsky
(1972) The Gooficon: A repair manual for English. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. and S. Hilles
(1988) Techniques and resources in teaching grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chapin, R. & M. Terdal
(1990) Responding to our response: Student strategies for responding to teacher written comments. ED328098Google Scholar
Chaudron, C.
(1986) Teachers’ priorities in correcting learners’ errors in French immersion classes. In R. R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1988) Second language classrooms. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1985) Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1988) Classroom second language development. London, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. M. and S. M. Conrad
(1990) Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly 24, 3:443–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, J. H.
(1987) Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research and practice. InM. H. Long & J. C. Richards (eds) Methodology in TESOL. New York, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Johnson, K.
(1988) Mistake correction. ELT Journal 42, 2:89–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keh, C. L.
(1990) Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal 44, 4:294–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leki, I.
(1991) The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24, 2:203–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, I.
(1984) Making sense of learners’ errors: A psycholinguistic appraisal. British Journal of Language Teaching 221:105–113.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1988) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. In W. Rutherford and M. Sharwood Smith (eds) Grammar and second language teaching. New York, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Porter, P. A.
(1986) How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centred discussions. In R. R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Robb, T., S. Ross & I. Shortreed
(1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20, 1:83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1991) Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research 7, 2, 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. & N. G. Frota
(1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M.
(1991) Speaking to many minds: on the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7, 2:118–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and C. Herron
(1989) Feedback for language transfer errors. The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 111:385–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walz, J. C.
(1982) Error correction techniques for the foreign language classroom. Language in education: Theory and practice. No. 50. ED217704.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Conrad, Susan M. & Lynn M. Goldstein
1999. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing 8:2  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Goldstein, Lynn M.
2004. Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing 13:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Mathisen, Petter & Cato Bjørndal
2016. Tablets as a digital tool in supervision of student teachers’ practical training. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 11:4  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Storch, Neomy & Joanna Tapper
1996. Patterns of NNS student annotations when identifying areas of concern in their writing. System 24:3  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Storch, Neomy & Joanna Tapper
1997. Student annotations: What NNS and NS university students say about their own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.