Supportive devices in language and paralanguage in the achievement of affiliation in troubles talk
This study uses the methodology of conversational analysis to examine a case of ‘troubles talk’ between a group of female survivors of rape:that is, conversation on the discourse topic of ‘troubles’ or problems, and displaying the close interactional distance of intimacy. Rather than dwelling on the sequential and functional framework of ‘troubles talk’, this paper analyses the conversational process of ‘affiliation’ between the interactants as it occurs within the structure of the conversation, and the linguistic and paralinguistic devices utilised successfully in the achievement of ‘affiliation’ in the ‘troubles talk’. Both topical and interactional levels are considered, as they interact in the conversation to achieve successful ‘affiliation’ and ‘affiliation response’. The successful utilisation of linguistic and paralinguistic devices in affiliation affect the consequent self-disclosure which is crucial in overcoming the trauma of the experiences discussed in the ‘troubles talk’. The significance of affiliation to social context, gender, and culture are also considered.
References (10)
Caraveli, A.
(
1986)
The bitter wounding:The lament as social protest in rural Greece. In
J. Dubisch (ed.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubisch, J.
(ed.) (
1986)
Gender and power in rural Greece. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, J., S. Cumming, and S. Schuetze-Coburn
(
1988)
Discourse transcription. In
S.A. Thompson (ed.).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, R.J.
(
1991)
The issue of natural data collection. Paper presented to the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Annual Conference, Townsville, October 1991.
Jefferson, G.
(
1988)
On the sequential organisation of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation.
Social Problems 35,4:418–441.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liddicoat, A. J.
(
1989)
The turn-taking system in multi-interviewee news interviews.
Melbourne Papers in Applied Linguistics 1,2:1–8.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
London Rape Crisis Centre
(
1984)
Sexual violence: The reality for women. London, Women’s Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sydney Rape Crisis Collective
(
1984)
Surviving rape. Sydney, Fontana/Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, D.
(
1990)
You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. New York, William Morrow.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S.A.
(
1988)
Discourse and grammar. (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 21) University of California, Santa Barbara.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Rizzo, Melissa, Stephanie Tikkanen & Emily T. Cripe
2023.
Hell Hath No Fury Like a Scorned Woman’s Friend: Reflected Anger in Academic Mother* Online Groups. In
Academic Mothers Building Online Communities,
► pp. 165 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie
2003.
Past troubles-talk in nonnative–native interviews.
Journal of Pragmatics 35:4
► pp. 615 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gordon, Cynthia
2003.
Aligning as a Team: Forms of Conjoined Participation in (Stepfamily) Interaction.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:4
► pp. 395 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.