Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp.91–116

Can cultural scripts be used for teaching interactional norms?

| The Australian National University
Improving the teaching of invisible culture is a recognised need in the TESOL sector. While there are both scholars calling for a more nuanced focus in classrooms, and teachers willing to take this approach, there has yet been no systematic approach developed for its teaching. This paper attempts to bridge the gap between theory and pedagogical need by proposing that the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) is a useful tool in ELT through which resources for teachers and learners can be developed. In particular, it will discuss the results of a pilot study into using cultural scripts to teach cultural norms, demonstrate how they can be applied to classroom teaching situations, and discuss how materials can be developed from the theories.
Keywords: natural semantic metalanguage, cultural scripts, English language teaching, teaching methods, migrant education, English as a second language, invisible culture, interactional norms, pragmatic awareness, cultural competence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Communicative competence
    • 2.2Why teach invisible culture?
  • 3.Methods for teaching culture
    • 3.1Methods for cultural description
    • 3.2Current teaching practices
  • 4.Trialing cultural scripts in a pedagogical context
    • 4.1Methodology and processes
    • 4.2The scripts for the classroom exercises
  • 5.Feedback from students
  • 6.Successes of cultural scripts and further considerations
    • 6.1How they address teacher and student needs
    • 6.2How can cultural scripts help in teaching culture?
    • 6.3Adaptations
    • 6.4Practical considerations
  • 7.Limits of this paper
  • 8.Future adaptations and directions
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17030.sad
References (52)
References
Alcón Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F. K. (1994). Ewe. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Semantic and Lexical Universals (pp. 57–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barraja-Rohan, A. -M. (2000). Teaching conversation and sociocultural norms with conversation analysis. In Teaching languages, teaching cultures (pp. 65–77). Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. (2000). Silences across languages. In Beyond translation (pp. 283–294). Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1993). How not to be a fluent fool. In New ways in teaching culture (pp. 16–21).Google Scholar
Besemeres, M., & Wierzbicka, A. (2007). Translating lives. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles (3rd ed.). White Plains: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bryers, D., Winstanley, B., & Cooke, M. (2014). The power of discussion. In Language issues in migration and integration: Perspectives from teachers and learners (pp. 37–54). London: British Council.Google Scholar
Burwitz-Melzer, E. (2001). Teaching intercultural communicative competence through literature. In M. Byram, A. Nichols, & D. Stevens (Eds.), Developing intercultural competence in practice (pp. 29–43). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, P. J., & Wolf, H. G. (2011). A dictionary of Hong Kong English: Words from the fragrant harbor (Hong Kong English). Aberdeen: Hong Kong University PressGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. -M. (2016). Multi-competence and personality. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, E. (2013). The ESL teacher as plurilingual: An Australian perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 446–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, S. S. (2016). Possible contributions of ethnopragmatics to second language learning and teaching. In Let us have articles betwixt us (pp. 185–206). Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2002, February). Cultural scripts and semantic primes: New tools for language teaching and language learning. Keynote address presented at the Global Forum on Mind, Culture and Drama in Language Study, Madison.
(2004). “Cultural scripts”: A new medium for ethnopragmatic instruction. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 143–163). Berlin: New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Cultural scripts: Applications to language teaching and intercultural communication. Studies in Pragmatics (Journal of the China Pragmatics Association), 31, 105–119.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2017). Minimal English for a global world. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2002a). Meaning and universal grammar. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
(2002b). Semantic primes and universal grammar. In Meaning and universal grammar (pp. 77–92). Clevedon: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for. Intercultural Pragmatics. 1(2), 153–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C., & Ye, Z. (2014). Ethnopragmatics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 66–83). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. -L. M. (2015). Understanding im/politeness across cultures: An interactional approach to raising sociopragmatic awareness. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(4), 389–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, E. (2013). Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 591, 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimnia, A., & Afghari, A. (2010). On the applicability of cultural scripts in teaching L2 compliments. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 71–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levisen, C. (2012). Cultural semantics and social cognition. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. (2000). Everyday speech as culture: Implications for language teaching. In Teaching languages, teaching cultures (pp. 51–63). Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J., & Crozet, C. (2003). Teaching Invisible Culture. Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
Mullan, K. (2010). Expressing opinions in French and Australian discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peeters, B. (2000). “S’Engager” vs “to show restraint”: Linguistic and cultural relativity in discourse management. In R. Dirven & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 193–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Tall poppies and egalitarianism in Australian discourse. English World-Wide, 25(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Language and cultural values: Towards an applied ethnolinguistics for the foreign language classroom. In B. Peeters, K. Mullan, & C. Béal (Eds.), Cross-culturally speaking, speaking cross-culturally (pp. 231–260). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Peterson, B. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2014). Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cultural linguistics and world Englishes. World Englishes, 34(4), 515–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, B., & Pulverness, A. (2013). Materials for cultural awareness. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 443–460). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics (2nd ed.). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). English: Meaning and culture. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Imprisoned in English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A., & Goddard, C. (2013). Words and Meanings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015, July). Global English, minimal English: Towards better intercultural communication. Keynote presented at the Minimal English Symposium.
Williams, M. (2001). ‘It must be cultural because I don’t do it’. In M. Byram, A. Nichols, & D. Stevens (Eds.), Developing intercultural competence in practice (pp. 111–129). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wintergerst, A. C., & McVeigh, J. (2011). Tips for Teaching Culture. White Plains: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wong, J. O. (2004). Cultural scripts, ways of speaking and perceptions of personal autonomy: Anglo English vs. Singapore English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 231–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ye, Z. (2004). Chinese categorization of interpersonal relationships and the cultural logic of Chinese social interaction: An indigenous perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 211–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). The semantics of nouns. In Z. Ye (Ed.), The semantics of nouns (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2017b). The semantics of nouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Peeters, Bert
2021. From Cultural to Pedagogical Scripts: Speaking Out in English, French, and Russian. In Minimal Languages in Action, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Susana S.
2020. Una introducción a la teoría de la Metalengua Semántica Natural (NSM) y su aplicación a la pragmática. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:3 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Susana S.
2020. Using NSM and “Minimal” Language for Intercultural Learning. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Susana S. & Cliff Goddard
2020. Una aproximación al estilo comunicativo de cercanía interpersonal del español a partir de la teoría de la Metalengua Semántica Natural. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:3 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Sadow, Lauren
2020. Principles and Prototypes of a Cultural Dictionary of Australian English for Learners. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Sadow, Lauren
2021. Standard Translatable English: A Minimal English for Teaching and Learning Invisible Culture in Language Classrooms. In Minimal Languages in Action, ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Sadow, Lauren & Kerry Mullan
2020. A Brief Introduction to the Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.