The relationship between content knowledge and practise opportunities in non-native learners’ interaction
The following study was undertaken to further understand the effect of content knowledge on learners’ participation in interactions between non-native speakers. 120 male students, all of them Spanish, were paired to form 20 dyads whose members had equal content knowledge, but different levels in oral proficiency, 20 dyads in which fluent learners were relative content experts, and 20 dyads in which learners with limited oral skills were the experts. Measures of conversational participation included: amount of talk, conversational fillers, back channels, topic moves, clarification questions, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. x
2 analysis of results indicated that, regardless of learners’ level of proficiency, relative content knowledge can explain different conversational patterns of participation: the relative expert producing more output (number of words), while the relative nonexpert works hard to understand the message. Findings of the study support the relationship between content knowledge and conversational participation in the context of non-native interaction.
References
Beebe, L.M. and H. Giles
(
1984)
Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition.
International Journal of the Sociology of Language 461: 5–32.
Brock, C., G. Crookes, R.R. Day, and M.H. Long
(
1986)
The differential effect of corrective feedback in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In
R.R. Day (ed.)
Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Carrell, P. L.
(
1983)
Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension.
Language Learning 331: 193–207
Carrell, P.L.
(
1987)
Content and formal schemata in ESL reading.
TESOL Quarterly 211: 461–481.
Cohen, J. A.
(
1960)
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.
Educational and Psychological measurement 201: 37–46.
Gass, S. M. and E. M. Varonis
(
1984)
The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech.
Language Learning 341: 65–89.
Gass, S. M. and E. M. Varonis
(
1986)
Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In
R.R. Day (ed.)
Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Hatch, E.
(
1992)
Discourse and language education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. and T. Pica
(
1986)
Information gap tasks: do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly 201: 305–325.
Duff, P.
(
1986)
Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In
R. R. Day (ed.)
Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Long, M.
(
1980)
Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lomg, M.
(
1981)
Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In
H. Winitz (ed.)
The Comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley MA., Newbury House
Long, M.
(
1983)
Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 51: 177–194.
Long, M.
(
1985)
Input and second language acquisition theory. In
S. Gass and
C. Madden (eds)
Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Markham, P.
(
1988)
Gender and perceived expertness of the speaker as factors in ESL listening recall.
TESOL Quarterly 221: 397–406.
Pica, T.
(
1987)
Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom.
Applied Linguistics 81: 3–21.
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, and L. Morgenthaler
(
1989)
Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 111: 63–90.
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, D. Berducci, and J. Newman
(
1991)
Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 131: 343–72.
Scarcella, R. C.
(
1983)
Discourse accent in second language performance. In
S. M Gass and
L. Selinker (eds)
Language transfer in language learning. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Selinker, L and D. Douglas
(
1985)
Wrestling with “context” in interlanguage theory.
Applied Linguistics 61: 190–204
Schachter, J.
(
1986)
Three approaches to the study of input.
Language Learning 361: 211–226
Swain, M.
(
1985)
Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In
S. Gass and
C. Madden (eds)
Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.
Woken, M. and J. M. Swales
(
1989)
Expertise and authority in native-nonnative conversations: The need for a variable account. In
S. M. Gass,
C. G. Madden,
D. R. Preston and
L. Selinker (eds)
Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters.
Zuengler, J. and B. Bent
(
1991)
Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native-nonnative conversations.
Applied Linguistics 121: 397–415.
Zuengler, J.
(
1993)
Encouraging learners’ conversational participation: The effect of content knowledge.
Language Learning 431: 403–432.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.