The relationship between content knowledge and practise opportunities in non-native learners’ interaction
The following study was undertaken to further understand the effect of content knowledge on learners’ participation in interactions between non-native speakers. 120 male students, all of them Spanish, were paired to form 20 dyads whose members had equal content knowledge, but different levels in oral proficiency, 20 dyads in which fluent learners were relative content experts, and 20 dyads in which learners with limited oral skills were the experts. Measures of conversational participation included: amount of talk, conversational fillers, back channels, topic moves, clarification questions, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. x
2 analysis of results indicated that, regardless of learners’ level of proficiency, relative content knowledge can explain different conversational patterns of participation: the relative expert producing more output (number of words), while the relative nonexpert works hard to understand the message. Findings of the study support the relationship between content knowledge and conversational participation in the context of non-native interaction.
References (26)
References
Beebe, L.M. and H. Giles (1984) Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 461: 5–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brock, C., G. Crookes, R.R. Day, and M.H. Long (1986) The differential effect of corrective feedback in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In R.R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carrell, P. L. (1983) Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning 331: 193–207 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carrell, P.L. (1987) Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 211: 461–481. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, J. A. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological measurement 201: 37–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M. and E. M. Varonis (1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning 341: 65–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M. and E. M. Varonis (1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R.R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hatch, E. (1992) Discourse and language education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doughty, C. and T. Pica (1986) Information gap tasks: do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly 201: 305–325. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duff, P. (1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (1980) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lomg, M. (1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (ed.) The Comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley MA., Newbury House![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 51: 177–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (1985) Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markham, P. (1988) Gender and perceived expertness of the speaker as factors in ESL listening recall. TESOL Quarterly 221: 397–406. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T. (1987) Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics 81: 3–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, and L. Morgenthaler (1989) Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 111: 63–90. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, D. Berducci, and J. Newman (1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 131: 343–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scarcella, R. C. (1983) Discourse accent in second language performance. In S. M Gass and L. Selinker (eds) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selinker, L and D. Douglas (1985) Wrestling with “context” in interlanguage theory. Applied Linguistics 61: 190–204 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, J. (1984) A universal input condition. In W. Rutherford (ed.) Universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, J. (1986) Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning 361: 211–226 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woken, M. and J. M. Swales (1989) Expertise and authority in native-nonnative conversations: The need for a variable account. In S. M. Gass, C. G. Madden, D. R. Preston and L. Selinker (eds) Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuengler, J. and B. Bent (1991) Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native-nonnative conversations. Applied Linguistics 121: 397–415. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuengler, J. (1993) Encouraging learners’ conversational participation: The effect of content knowledge. Language Learning 431: 403–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.