Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (1995) ► pp. 19–32

The relationship between content knowledge and practise opportunities in non-native learners’ interaction

| University Jaume I, Castellón
| University Jaume I, Castellón
The following study was undertaken to further understand the effect of content knowledge on learners’ participation in interactions between non-native speakers. 120 male students, all of them Spanish, were paired to form 20 dyads whose members had equal content knowledge, but different levels in oral proficiency, 20 dyads in which fluent learners were relative content experts, and 20 dyads in which learners with limited oral skills were the experts. Measures of conversational participation included: amount of talk, conversational fillers, back channels, topic moves, clarification questions, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. x 2 analysis of results indicated that, regardless of learners’ level of proficiency, relative content knowledge can explain different conversational patterns of participation: the relative expert producing more output (number of words), while the relative nonexpert works hard to understand the message. Findings of the study support the relationship between content knowledge and conversational participation in the context of non-native interaction.
Published online: 01 January 1995
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18.2.02alc
References

References

Beebe, L.M. and H. Giles
(1984) Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 5–32.Google Scholar
Brock, C., G. Crookes, R.R. Day, and M.H. Long
(1986) The differential effect of corrective feedback in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In R.R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L.
(1983) Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning 33: 193–207 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, P.L.
(1987) Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 21: 461–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. A.
(1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological measurement 20: 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. and E. M. Varonis
(1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning 34: 65–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R.R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.
(1992) Discourse and language education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. and T. Pica
(1986) Information gap tasks: do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly 20: 305–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P.
(1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1980) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lomg, M.
(1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (ed.) The Comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley MA., Newbury HouseGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5: 177–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Markham, P.
(1988) Gender and perceived expertness of the speaker as factors in ESL listening recall. TESOL Quarterly 22: 397–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(1987) Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics 8: 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, and L. Morgenthaler
(1989) Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 63–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis, D. Berducci, and J. Newman
(1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 343–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, R. C.
(1983) Discourse accent in second language performance. In S. M Gass and L. Selinker (eds) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, L and D. Douglas
(1985) Wrestling with “context” in interlanguage theory. Applied Linguistics 6: 190–204 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1984) A universal input condition. In W. Rutherford (ed.) Universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning 36: 211–226 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley MA., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Woken, M. and J. M. Swales
(1989) Expertise and authority in native-nonnative conversations: The need for a variable account. In S. M. Gass, C. G. Madden, D. R. Preston and L. Selinker (eds) Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Zuengler, J. and B. Bent
(1991) Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native-nonnative conversations. Applied Linguistics 12: 397–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuengler, J.
(1993) Encouraging learners’ conversational participation: The effect of content knowledge. Language Learning 43: 403–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Alcón, Eva
2000. The role of conversational interaction in the development of a second language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16 ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.