Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 42:3 (2019) ► pp.274–300

Language programming in rural and regional Victoria

Making space for local viewpoints in policy development

ORCID logo | The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne

Despite decades of often ambitious policies in Australia, languages education is still characterized by intermittent commitment to the teaching of languages, with inequitable access particularly entrenched in rural and regional contexts. While research has focused on the practical and material constraints impacting on policy implementation, little research has investigated the role of the discursive terrain in shaping expectations and limitations around what seems achievable in schools, particularly, from the school principal perspective. Beginning with an overview of policy interventions and an analysis of contemporary challenges, we use Q methodology to identify and analyze viewpoints at work in similarly-positioned rural and regional schools. In doing so, we seek to determine what seems possible or impossible across settings; the role of principals in enabling and constraining pathways for the provision of school language programs, and the need for macro-level language policy to be informed by constraints specific to rural and regional contexts.

Keywords: language policy, language programming, language education, educational equity, rural schooling, social cohesion, school leadership
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Uneven gains in policy, implementation, and quality
    • 2.1Situating contemporary challenges
  • 3.Discourse mediating the policy and practice (dis)juncture
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Schools and participants
    • 4.2Statistical procedure
  • 5.Viewpoint 1: No excuses? Committed but stymied
  • 6.Viewpoint 2: Let’s get on with the job!
  • 7.Viewpoint 3: English is the language of hopes of dreams
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18030.sla
References
Aboriginal Languages Act
2017 (NSW) No. 51 (Austl.). Retrieved from [URL]
ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority)
(2011) The shape of the Australian curriculum: Languages. Retrieved from: [URL]
ACARA
(2013) About ICSEA. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed 10 October 2016.
(2016) Languages. Retrieved from [URL]
AEF (Asia Education Foundation)
(2011) National statement on Asia literacy in Australian schools 2011–2012. Melbourne: Asia Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J.
(1993) What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baranick, N., & Markham, P.
(1986) Attitudes of elementary school principals toward foreign language instruction, Foreign Language Annals, 29(6), 481–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, S., Wright, J., & Cruickshank, K.
(2018) The struggle for legitimacy: Language provision in two ‘residual’ comprehensive high schools in Australia. Critical Studies in Education, 59(3), 348–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. R.
(1980) Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3–4), 91–138.Google Scholar
Brown, S. R., & Good, J. M. M.
(2010) Q Methodology. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 31, pp. 1149–1155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Caffery, J., McConvell, P., & Simpson, J.
(2009) Gaps in Australia’s Indigenous language policy: Dismantling bilingual education in the Northern Territory. Retrieved from [URL]
Coghlan, P., & Holcz, P.
(2014) The state of play: Languages education in Western Australia. Government of Western Australia School Curriculum and Standards Authority. Retrieved from: [URL]
Commonwealth of Australia
(2008) Australia 2020 summit. Final report. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. [URL]
Cross, R.
(2013) Research and evaluation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach to teaching and learning Languages in Victorian schools. Melbourne: DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development).Google Scholar
(2016) Language and content ‘integration’: The affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 388–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruickshank, K., & Wright, J.
(2016) A tale of two cities. What the dickens happened to languages in NSW? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 72–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, H.
(2016) Understanding social justice in rural education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DEECD
(2009) Education for global and multicultural citizenship. Retrieved from [URL]
(2011) The Victorian government’s vision for languages education. Melbourne: DEECD. Retrieved from [URL]
(2012) Towards Victoria as a learning community. Melbourne: DEECD. Retrieved from [URL]
(2013a) Languages in Victorian government schools 2012. Retrieved from [URL]
(2013b) Languages – expanding your world. Plan to implement the Victorian government’s vision for languages education 2013–2025. Retrieved from [URL]
DEET (Department of Education, Employment and Training)
(2001) Languages Other Than English in government schools, 2001. Melbourne: DEET.Google Scholar
DET (Department of Education and Training)
(2017a) Languages. Retrieved from [URL]
DET
(2017b) Summary Statistics for Victorian Government Schools. Retrieved from [URL]
(2018) Languages Provision in Victorian Government Schools, 2017. Melbourne: DET. Retrieved from [URL]
Drysdale, L., & Gurr, D.
(2011) Theory and practice of successful school leadership in Australia. School Leadership and Management, 31(4), 355–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engels, N., Hotton, G., Devos, G., Boukenooghe, D., & Aelterman, A.
(2008) Principals in schools with a positive culture. Educational Studies, 34(3), 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.
(2000) The new literacy studies: From the ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grieve, A.
(2015) ‘Die Erfüllung eines Traums’: Challenging the monolingual mindset through the establishment of an early immersion language programme. In J. Hajek & Y. Slaughter (Eds.), Challenging the monolingual mindset (pp. 227–240). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kleinhenz, E., Wilkinson, J., Gearon, M., Fernandez, S., & Ingvarson, L.
(2007) The review of teacher education for languages teachers. Final report. Retrieved from [URL]
Liddicoat, A., Curnow, T., & Scarino, A.
(2016) The trajectory of a language policy: The First Language Maintenance and Development program in South Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A., Scarino, A., Curnow, T. J., Kohler, M., Scrimgeour, A., & Morgan, A.
(2007) An investigation of the state and nature of languages in Australian schools. Canberra: DEST. Retrieved from [URL]
Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K.
(2014) Micro language planning for multilingual education: Agency in local contexts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 237–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, J.
(2010) The struggle to retain diversity in language education. In A. J. Liddicoat & A. Scarino (Eds.), Languages in Australian education. Problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 97–108). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2015) Exploring language problems through Q-sorting. In F. Hult & D. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 69–80). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J., & Aliani, R.
(2013) Language planning and student experiences. Intention, rhetoric and implementation. Bristol, UK.: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, J., & Slaughter, Y.
(2016a) Bilingual education in Australia. In O. Garcia & A. Lin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Bilingual education (Vol. 51, pp. 347–360). Cham, Switzerland.: Springer.Google Scholar
(2016b) The Australian Asia project. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim, & H. G. Wolf. (Eds.), Communicating with Asia (pp. 296–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MCEETYA (Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs)
(2005) National statement and plan for languages. Retrieved from [URL]
MCEETYA
(2008) Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from [URL]
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D.
(1988) Q Methodology. Newbury Park, CA.: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A.
(2009) Modern languages in the primary curriculum: Are we creating conditions for success? Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H., Moore, H., Clyne, M., & Pauwels, A.
(1993) Languages at the crossroads: The report of the national enquiry into the employment and supply of teachers of Languages Other Than English (Australia). East Melbourne, VIC: NLLIA.Google Scholar
Paige, J. B.
(2014) Making sense of methods and measurement: Q-Methodology Part I – Philosophical background. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 101, 639–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, L. B., & Southwell, L.
(2014) Access to academic curriculum in Australian secondary schools: A case study of a highly marketised education system. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 467–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarino, A.
(2014) Situating the challenges in current languages education policy in Australia – unlearning monolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(3), 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E.
(2009) Language teachers as partners in crafting educational language policies? Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 14(22), 45–67.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Y.
(2007) The rise and fall of Indonesian in Australian schools: Implications for language policy and planning. Asian Studies Review, 31(3), 301–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Bringing Asia to the home front: The Australian experience of Asian language education through national policy. In C. Norrby & J. Hajek (Eds.), Uniformity and diversity in language policy: Global perspectives (pp.157–173). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smala, S.
(2013) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) pedagogies in Queensland. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(3), 194–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smala, S., Paz, J. B., & Lingard, B.
(2013) Languages, cultural capital and school choice: Distinction and second language immersion programmes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 373–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taskforce, Australia in the Asian century
(2012) Australia in the Asian Century White Paper, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Retrieved from [URL]
Teese, R., & Polesel, J.
(2003) Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.Google Scholar
VAGO (Victorian Auditor General’s Office)
(2014) Access to education for rural students. Victorian Auditor-General’s Report, April 2014. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Ward, D., & East, M.
(2016) Is language learning languishing? Stakeholders’ perspectives on the provision of secondary foreign languages programmes in New Zealand. The New Zealand Modern Language Teacher, 421, 44–62.Google Scholar
Watts, S., & Stenner, P.
(2012) Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wright, J., Cruickshank, K., & Black, S.
(2018) Languages discourses in Australian middle-class schools: Parent and student perspectives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 98–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, K. A., & Golder, P. A.
(1982) The Guttman-Kaiser criterion as a predictor of the number of common factors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D, 31(3), 221–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

A. Damar, Ebru & Pinar Sali
2022. Q Methodology. In Methodological Innovations in Research and Academic Writing [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
CARUSO, MARINELLA & NICOLA FRASCHINI
2021. A Q Methodology Study Into Vision of Italian L2 University Students: An Australian Perspective. The Modern Language Journal 105:2 ► pp. 552 ff. DOI logo
Fraschini, Nicola & Hyunjin Park
2021. Anxiety in language teachers: Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology. Foreign Language Annals 54:2 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Hagger-Vaughan, Lesley
2020. Is the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) helping participation in language learning in secondary schools in England?. The Language Learning Journal 48:5 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Su Eun, Nicola Fraschini & Hyunjin Park
2023. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Li, Xiaodong
2022. The significance of Q-methodology as an innovative method for the investigation of affective variables in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Lu, Xiuchuan & Zhi Geng
2022. Faith or path? Profiling the motivations of multilingual Chinese as a foreign language teachers using Q methodology. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882210990 ff. DOI logo
Lundberg, Adrian, Renske de Leeuw & Renata Aliani
2020. Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational Research Review 31 ► pp. 100361 ff. DOI logo
Vanbuel, Marieke
2022. How stakeholders see the implementation of language education policy: a Q-study. Current Issues in Language Planning 23:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.