Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (1996) ► pp. 89110
Allan, K. and D. Burridge
(1991) Euphemism and dysphemism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V
(1983) Simplification v. easification-the case of legal texts. Applied Linguistics 4, 1: 42–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Language of the law. Language Teaching 201:227–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danet, B
(1980) Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review 141:445–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J
(1990) Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourses. London, The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M
(1978) Language as social semiotic. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammond, J
(1991) Synoptic and dynamic analyses of classroom discourse: The role of meta language in teaching literacy. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 14, 2: 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R
(1993) Legal English: Subject specific literacy and genre theory. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16, 2: 86–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E
(1987) Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, J
(1988) Genres, semantics and classroom education. Linguistics and Education 11:81–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, J
(1987) Conducting tutorials. Kensington, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.Google Scholar
Matalene, C.B.
(ed.) (1989) Worlds of writing. New York, Random House.Google Scholar
McKenna, E
(1987) Preparing foreign students to enter discourse communities in the U.S. English For Academic Purposes 61:187–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, T
(1989) In the law the text is king. In Matalene (ed.)Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and R. Coulthard
(1978) Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupil. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J
(1991) Genre analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1982) The case of cases. IRAL 20, 2: 139–148.Google Scholar
Warnock, W
(1989) To English professors: On what to do with a lawyer. In Matalene (ed.).Google Scholar
White, J
(1982) The invisible discourse of the law: Reflections on legal literacy and general education. Michigan Quarterly Review420–438.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H
(1984) Language purpose and language use. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar