Ellipsis in Mandarin
Places where learners don’t use.
Overall, learners of Mandarin tend to use overt nouns and pronouns to a greater extent than native speakers (Charters 1996b), but what specifically gives rise to this discrepancy? Differences in the distribution of ellipsis in learner and native speaker texts is investigated: both frequency and discourse contexts of syntactic structures associated with ellipsis are compared. Learners made no errors of ellipsis in structures where ellipsis is grammatically prescribed, nor did they appear to avoid such syntactic structures. In fact, the discrepancy in overall frequencies arises in contexts where ellipsis is optional; it is a consequence not of differing syntactic choices, but of differing pragmatic choices in comparable syntactic contexts. No single syntactic structure emerges as a significant contributor to the different rates of optional ellipsis overall. However, when individual variation is taken into account, it is clear that some learners use ellipsis only in syntactic contexts where it is permissible in English, and most learners use elliptic syntactic structures in a narrower range of discourse contexts than is typical of native speaker use.
References (46)
Aoun, J.
(
1985)
A grammar of anaphora. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Battistella, E.
(
1985)
On the distribution of PRO in Chinese.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31:317-340.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Besnier, N.
(
1985)
The local organisation of zero anaphora in Tuvaluan conversation.
Te Reo: Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 281:119-147.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, J.
(ed) (
1982)
The mental representation of grammatical relations. Canbridge, MA, MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charters, A.H.
(
1996a)
A silence more eloquent: NP ellipsis in Mandarin discourse. M.A. Thesis, ANU.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charters, A.H.
(
1996b)
A comparison of learner and native speaker NP ellipsis in Mandarin.
Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 391:3-23.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen Ping
(
1984)
A discourse analysis of third person zero anaphora in Chinese. Bloomington IA, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1980)
On binding.
Linguistic Inquiry 111:1-46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1981)
Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, S.
(
1989)
On the notion of ‘null anaphor’ in Chamorro. In
Jaeggli and
Safir (eds).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D.
(
1992)
A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. (3rd edition) Oxford, Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Espino de Valdivia, I.
(
1989)
Universal trends in nominal zero anaphora: An inquiry into Japanese and Spanish discourse.
Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan 341:70-83.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farmer, A.K. and R.M. Harnish
Fillmore, C.J.
(
1969)
Types of lexical information. In
F. Kiefer (ed)
Studies in syntax and semantics. Dordrecht, Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J.
(
1986)
Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In
Nikiforidou et al. (eds)
Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givon, T.
(
1983)
Introduction. In
T. Givon (ed)
Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam, Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L.
(
1991)
Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horrocks, G.
(
1987)
Generative grammar. London, Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.T.J.
(
1982)
Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD. dissertation. MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.T.J.
(
1984)
On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.
Linguistic Inquiry 15,4:531-44
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.T.J.
(
1989)
Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalised control theory. In
Jaeggli and
Safir (eds).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.T.J.
(
1993)
Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences.
Linguistic Inquiry 24,1:103-138.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang Yan
(
1992)
Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories.
Journal of Pragmatics 171:1-29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang Yan
(
1994)
The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeggli, O. and K.J. Safir
eds
The null subject parameter Dordrecht Kluwer
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Junghare, I.Y.
(
1988)
Topic-prominence and zero NP-anaphora in Marathi and Hindi. In
M.A. Jazayery and
W. Winter (eds)
Languages and cultures: Studies in honour of Edgar C Polome. (Trends in Linguistics 361) Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, R.M. and J. Bresnan
(
1982)
Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In
Bresnan (ed).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Polla, R.
(
1993)
Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘object’ as viable concepts in Chinese.
The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica. 63,4. Taiwan, Academia Sinica.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Polla, R.
(
1994)
Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In
M. Noonan and
P. Downing (eds)
Word order in discourse (Typological Studies in Language 301). Amsterdam/Philedelphia, John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, H.
(ed) (
1989)
Essays on anaphora, studies in natural language and linguistic theory. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C.
(
1983)
Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C.
(
1987a)
Minimisation and conversational inference. In
Verschueren and
Bertuccelli-Papi (eds).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C.
(
1987b)
Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena.
Journal of Linguistics 231:379-434.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C.
(
1991)
Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 271:107-61.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, C.N. and S. Thompson
(
1979)
Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. In
T. Givon (ed)
Discourse and syntax. (Syntax and Semantics 121) New York and London: Academic Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B.
(
1986) (ed)
Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. 21 Vols. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M.R.
(
1983)
On control and control theory.
Linguistic Inquiry 141:554-561.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T.
(
1976)
The syntactic domain of anaphora. Ph.d. dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T.
(
1983)
Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London, Croom Helm.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L.
(
1986)
Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro.
Linguistic Inquiry 171:501-58.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shopen, T.
(
1972)
A generative theory of ellipsis: A consideration of the linguistic use of silence. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shopen, T.
(
1973)
Ellipsis as grammatical indeterminacy.
Foundations of Language 101:65-77.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verschueren, J. and M. Bertuccelli-Papi
White, L.
(
1985)
The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition.
Language Learning 351:47-61.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, J.
(
1989)
Pronoun copies, pronominal and zero anaphora. In
S. Gass et al. (eds)
Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Hassall, Tim
2001.
Modifying requests in a second language.
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 39:4
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.