Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (1997) ► pp.83–104

From emergence to acquisition

Developmental issues in Arabic interlanguage morphology

 | Deakin University
This paper concerns the emergence and development of agreement marking in Arabic interlanguage. It investigates the effect of competing structures (pragmatics, semantics and morphosyntax) on the development of Arabic subject-verb agreement morphology. It is hypothesised that Arabic Interlanguage morphology is constrained by the availability of processing strategies (Clahsen, 1986) and competing information structures (Bates and McWhinney, 1981; 1987) especially when dealing with complex agreement patterns. The results show that linguistic complexity (a) influences the types of processing strategies employed and (b) determines the order of acquisition of different agreement patterns. It is also revealed that when the three information structures compete for interpretation of speech, morphosyntax emerges as the least influential eventhough it seems that S-V agreement in Arabic, at least on the surface, is essentially a transfer of morphosyntactic features (person, number and gender) from the subject onto the verb.
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20.1.05man
References (43)
References
Anderson, S.R. (1985) Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (ed) Language typology and syntactic description. Vol1 31. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakalla, M.H. (ed) (1980) Proceedings of the first international symposium on teaching Arabic to non-Arabic speakers. Riyadh, University of Riyadh.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (1992) A situated theory of agreement. New York, Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. (1981) SLA from a functional perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (ed) Annals of the New York Academy of Science conference on native and foreign language acquisition. New York, New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney Bates. (1987) Language universals, individual variation, and the competition model. In B. McWhinney and E. Bates (eds) Mechanisms of language acquisition. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T.G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic competence. In T.G. Hayes (ed) Cognition and tlie development of language. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.L. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Natural morphology: the organisation of paradigms and language acquisition. In Huebner and Ferguson (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C., E. Cancino, E. Rosansky and J. Schumann (1975) Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults. Report submitted to the National Institute of education, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1986) Connecting theories of language processing and (second) language acquisition. C.W. Pfaff (ed) First and second language acquisition processes. Cambridge, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. and P. Muysken (1989). The UG paradox and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 21:99-119.Google Scholar
Cooreman, A. and K. Kilborn (1991) Functional linguistics: Discourse structure and language processing in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner and C.A. Ferguson (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decamp, D. (1973) Implicational scales and socio linguistic linearity. Linguistics 731:30-43.Google Scholar
Dik, S. (1978) Functional grammar. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. (1988) Agreement in Arabic, Binding and coherence. In M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds) Agreement in natural language. Stanford, CA, CSLI.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1979) Discourse and syntax (Syntax and Semantics No 121) New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gutman, L. (1948) A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociolinguistic Review 91:139-150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1976) A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning 26,2:321-351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huebner T. and C. A. Ferguson (eds) (1991) Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. (1991) SLA theory: Prolegomena to a theory of language acquisition and implications for theoretical linguistics. In T. Huebner and C. A. Ferguson (eds).Google Scholar
Lapointe, S.G. (1984) Toward a unified theory of agreement. Paper presented at the Conference on Agreement in Natural Language, Stanford University.
(1988.b) Distinguishing types of morphosyntactic co-occurences: mismatch resolution, agreement and government. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 21 Parasession on agreement in grammatical theory. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1986) Foundations of cognitive grammar topics, in B. Rudaka-Oyston (ed) Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. and M. Long (1991) An introduction to second language classroom research. London, Longman.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J and A. Prince, (1990) Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid and McCarthy (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eid, M. and J. McCarthy (eds) (1990) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F. (1995.a) A discourse approach to the acquisition of Arabic S-V agreement by Australian learners. Unpublished M.A thesis. The Australian National University.Google Scholar
(1995.b) The acquisition of Arabic subject-verb agreement by Australian learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16,2:64-85.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., H. Clahsen and M. Pienemann, (1981) On determining developmental stages in natural SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3,1:109-135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammad, M.A. (1990) The problem of subject-verb agreement in Arabic: Towards a solution, in Eid and McCarthy (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moutaouakil, A. (1985) Topic in Arabic: Towards a functional analysis. In A.M. Bolkestein, C. De Groot and J. L. Mackenzie (eds) Syntax and pragmatics in functional grammar. Foris Publication: Dordrecht-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neel, A.F. (1980) Fundamentals of Arabic grammar for non-Arabic Speakers. In Bakalla (ed.).Google Scholar
Omar, M. (1973) The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague, Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6,2:186-214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M and M. Johnston (1985) Towards an explanatory model of language acquisition. Paper presented at the 1985 Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum, UCLA.
Pienemann, M. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 101:52-79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Towards a theory of processability in second language acquisition. Unpublished ms, Australian National University. A more comprehensive edition of this paper is to appear in a forthcoming book Language processing and second language acquisition.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1983) Language typology and language transfer. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (eds) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. (1986) An autolexical view of pronouns, anaphora and agreement. Working Papers on Linguistics, University of Chicago, 21.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C.A. Ferguson and D.I. Slobin (eds) Studies of child language development. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(ed) (1985) The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., and W.A. Foley, (1980) Role and reference grammar. In E.A. Moravcsik and J.R. Wirth. (eds) Current approaches to syntax. New York, Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Al Shatter, Ghassan
2011. Processability approach to Arabic L2 teaching and syllabus design. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Kawaguchi, Satomi
2009. Acquiring Causative Constructions in Japanese as a Second Language. Japanese Studies 29:2 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.