A model of citation options
The practice of citation is indicative of academic discourse. Over the last two decades, a number of papers have explored the language of citation, some directly motivated by concern about poor citation practices among student writers. This emerging interest has given us detailed understanding of specific aspects of citation language, for example verb tense, thematic choice, voice, and the name of the cited author (eg. Swales 1986, Thompson and Ye 1991, Shaw 1992, Thomas and Hawes 1994a, Thomas and Hawes 1994b). However, we do not yet have a tool for analysing citation in terms of the underlying intertextual understandings of academic writers. This paper proposes a model of citation options which relates variation in citation language forms to writers’ ability to control how they position themselves and their texts within a multi-member colloquy that is the academic community, past, present and future. Academic writers use variation in citation language to present knowledge as more or less negotiable, and in so doing control their readers’ engagement on points of controversy. The model is potentially valuable both pedagogically and for analysing specific discourse issues, within and across academic disciplines.
Published online: 01 January 1997
Baynham, M., D. Beck, K. Gordon, A. Lee and C. San Miguel
Bloch, J. and L. Chi
Thomas, S. and T. P. Hawes
Thomas, S. and T. Hawes
Thompson, G. and Y. Ye
Biology texts referred to
Cohen, E., A. Gamliel, and J. Katan
Descolas-Gros, C. and M. Fontugne
Political Science texts referred to
Garnett, J. C.
Cited by other publications
Cheng, Fei-Wen & Len Unsworth
Kwan, Becky S.C.
Kwan, Becky Siu Chu
Kwan, Becky Siu Chu
Kwan, Becky Siu Chu & Hang Chan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.