Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (1998) ► pp. 123137
References
Atkinson, J. M.
(1992) Displaying neutrality: formal aspects of informal court proceedings. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at work. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. & P. Drew
(1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London, Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C.
(1990) Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 141:629–647.Google Scholar
Cafarella, C.
(1997) Assessor accommodation in the VCE Italian oral test. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 20,1:21–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheepen, C.
(1988) The predictability of informal conversation. London, Pinter.Google Scholar
Drew, P. and J. Heritage
(1992) (eds.) Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, C.
(1993) Report on the native-speaker presence in university lote courses. Melbourne, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Filipi, A.
(1994) Interaction in an Italian oral test: The role of some expansion sequences. In R. Gardner (ed.) Spoken interaction studies in Australia. (Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S Number 7) Melbourne, ALAA.Google Scholar
Frankel, R.M.
(1990) Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In G. Psathas. (ed.) Interaction competence. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.
(1994) On some apparently anomalous uses of mm in a corpus of Australian English: Mm as a prior turn completer. Unpublished manuscript. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Giannone, S.
(1996) Overlapping talk: Talk show interaction. Paper given at the 1996 ALAA Conference, Sydney.
Greatbatch, D.
(1988) A turn taking system for British news interviews. Language and Society 171:401–430.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. and D. Greatbatch
(1991) On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and social structure. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 91:47–96.Google Scholar
(1984) Notes on a Systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens “yeah” and “mm hm”. Papers in Linguistics 171:197–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazaraton, A.
(1991) A conversation analysis of structure and interaction in the language interview. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. UCLA.Google Scholar
McHoul, A.W.
(1978) The organisation of formal turns at talk in the classroom. Language in Society 71:183–213.Google Scholar
Mehan, H.
(1985) The structure of classroom discourse. In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 31 Discourse and dialogue. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Minini, G.
(1985) The ontogenesis of telephone interaction. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 171:187–197.Google Scholar
Ross, S.
(1992) Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews. Language Testing 9,2:173–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubino, A.
(1990) From guest to family friend: Fieldwork progress within the Italo-Australian context. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 1:77–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures in conversation Vol 2.1 G. Jefferson (ed.) Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 701:1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.) Analysing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
E. Schegloff, G. Jefferson and H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair for conversation. Language 531:361–382.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, M.J. & J. Heritage
(1991) And-prefacing as a feature of question design. In L. Laitinen, P. Nuolijarvi, and M. Saari (eds) Leikkauspiste. Helsinki, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
ten Have, P.
(1991) Talk and institution: a reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction.” In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Testa, R.
(1988) Interruptive strategies in English and Italian conversation: Smooth versus contrastive linguistic preferences. Multilingua 7,3:285–312.Google Scholar
van Lier, L.
(1989) Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly 231:489–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Victorian Board of Studies
(1994) The LOTE Italian VCE study design. Victoria, Victorian Board of Studies.Google Scholar
Watson, D.R.
(1990) Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations. In G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction competence. Washington D.C., University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B.
(1992) Performance testing for work-related second language assessment. In E. Shohamy and R. Walton (eds) Language assessment for feedback: Testing and other strategies. Washington, D.C., National Foreign Language Center Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
2007. Language as action. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3  pp. 30.1 ff. Crossref logo
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
2007. Language as action. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3  pp. 30.1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.