Cover not available
Article published In:
Translingual practices entangled with semiotized space and time
Edited by Shaila Sultana and Dariush Izadi
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 45:2] 2022
► pp. 219–239

Phones as a semiotic disadvantage

English as a Foreign language migrants in Australia

ORCID logo | Curtin University
While previous studies have outlined the advantages of semiotic resources for meaning making and relationship building, not all semiotic resources are equal in their ability to enhance these features. Using linguistic ethnographic interviews and focus group discussions, this article examines whether mobile phones provide sufficient semiotic resources for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) migrants to effectively communicate, particularly for service situations regarding finances where they often have to speak in English with unknown interlocutors. Two important elements are uncovered regarding EFL migrants’ difficulty in using phones as a semiotic resource – (1) linguistic superiority, where they are judged by their English-speaking interlocutor as engaging in inferior English practices, and (2) paralinguistic insufficiency, where the lack of gestures and facial expressions takes away their ability to make meaning. These elements combined make telephone conversations difficult for many EFL migrants, affecting their expressiveness and ability to effectively communicate, leading to negative outcomes such as avoidance behaviors, and feelings of anxiety and disempowerment. Such difficulties lead to the finding that EFL migrants must be better accommodated when engaging in service transactions, with other, semiotically richer resources required to better aid their understanding and ease feelings of anxiety.
Keywords: semiotics, phones, linguistic superiority, paralinguistic insufficiency, EFL migrants, Australia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Phones as a semiotic advantage for communication
  • 3.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage for communication
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Ethics
  • 6.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage: Linguistic superiority
  • 7.Phones as a semiotic disadvantage: Paralinguistic insufficiency
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21028.dry
References (41)
References
Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2008). Mobile presence and intimacy: Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 1, 1905–1923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Back, M., Han, M., & Weng, S. C. A. (2020). Emotional scaffolding for emergent multilingual learners through translanguaging: Case stories. Language and Education, 34 (5), 387–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, T. K. (2018). Accent, intelligibility, mental health, and trauma. World Englishes, 37 1, 421–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birney, M. E., Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Heath, H., & Ashcroft, S. (2020). When speaking English is not enough: The consequences of language-based stigma for nonnative speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39 (1), 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2020). Interaction ritual and the body in a city meat market. Social Semiotics, 30 (1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13 (2), 1–20.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2011). Race and the re-embodied voice in Hollywood film. Language & Communication, 31 1, 255–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–200). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39 (1), 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41 (5), 545–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2020). Linguistic racism: Its negative effects and why we need to contest it. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23 (7), 833–837. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dovchin, S. (2015). Language, multiple authenticities and social media: The online language practices of university students in Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19 (4), 437–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Language crossing and linguistic racism: Mongolian immigrant women in Australia. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14 (4), 334–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). The psychological damages of linguistic racism and international students in Australia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23 (7), 804–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2017). Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foo, A. L., & Tan, Y. Y. (2019). Linguistic insecurity and the linguistic ownership of English among Singaporean Chinese. World Englishes, 38 1, 606–629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T., & Paul, K. (2013). Texting versus talking: An exploration in telecommunication language. Telematics and Informatics, 30 1, 289–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2017). Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics, 27 (4), 495–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karpiński, M. (2012). The boundaries of language: Dealing with paralinguistic features. Lingua Posnaniensis, 54 (2), 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14 (3), 219–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. W., & Dovchin, S. (2020). Negotiating innovation and ordinariness. In J. W. Lee & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 1–5). Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2016). New Chinglish and the post-multilingualism challenge: Translanguaging ELF in China. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5 (1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maybin, J., & Tusting, K. (2011). Linguistic ethnography. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 515–528). Routledge.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14 (3), 269–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2020). The mundanity of metrolingual practices. In J. W. Lee & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 9–23). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pink, S., Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Nettheim, J., & Bell, G. (2018). Digital work and play: Mobile technologies and new ways of feeling at home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21 (1), 26–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosa, J. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26 (2), 162–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossini, N. (2012). Reinterpreting Gesture as Language. IOS Press.Google Scholar
Schandorf, M. (2012). Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19 (3), 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. B. (2009). Ethnography. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86 1, 191–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137–152). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sultana, S. (2019). Resources within the local-global interface of the virtual space: Critically aware youths in Bangladesh. In T. A. Barrett & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Critical inquiries in the sociolinguistics of globalization (pp. 1–19). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. R. (2011). Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H., Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2017). Multilingual, multisensory and multimodal repertoires in corner shops, streets and markets: Introduction. Social Semiotics, 27 (4), 383–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Izadi, Dariush & Stephanie Dryden
2024. Woman/life/freedom: The social semiotics behind the 2022 Iranian protest movement. Discourse, Context & Media 60 ► pp. 100803 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Sender Dovchin
2024. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2015–2022). Language Teaching 57:3 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Dryden, Stephanie & Dariush Izadi
2023. The small things of Global South: Exploring the use of social media through translingualism. Discourse, Context & Media 51 ► pp. 100668 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.