Multiple perspectives on group work in a multilingual context
Group assignments are widely used in higher education for a range of educational reasons. Although there is a large body of research on the merits of group work and factors that may contribute to successful group work, less is known about students’ and teachers’ perspectives, particularly when groups are composed of students from diverse linguistic backgrounds. The current qualitative study investigated students’ and teachers’ perspectives on group assignments in a Master of Applied Linguistics program offered by a leading research university in Australia. The program has predominantly English as an additional language (EAL) students. Teachers and students in four graduate subjects that involved group assignments were interviewed for their views and reflections. Analysis of the interview data revealed similarities and differences in perspectives in five main areas – group work benefits and challenges, group formation and assessment, and the need for pre-implementation training. The findings highlight the need for teachers to promote open discussion about the purposes and merits of group work, both pedagogical and social.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Setting and participants
- 2.2Instruments
- 2.3Data analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Teachers’ perspectives on group work
- 3.2Students’ perspectives on group work
- 3.2.1Students’ attitudes to group work
- 3.2.2Students’ views regarding group formation
- 3.2.3Students’ views regarding assessment
- 3.2.4Students’ views regarding pre-assignment training
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (36)
References
Bacon, D. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education,
29
(2), 248–267.
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. R., & Anderson, E. S. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation and Gaming,
32
(1), 6–17.
Brown, C. A., & Mcllory, K. (2011). “Group work in healthcare students’ education: What do we think we are doing?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
36
(6), 687–699.
Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M., Toy, D., & Write, L. (2006). Can’t we pick our own group? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education,
30
(4), 557–569.
Cheng, L. T. W., Armatas, C. A., & Wang, J. W. (2020). The impact of diversity, prior academic achievement and goal orientation on learning performance in group capstone projects. Higher Education Research & Development,
39
(5), 913–925.
Cruickshank, K., Chen, H., & Warren, S. (2012). Increasing international and domestic student interaction through group work: A case study from humanities. Higher Education Research & Development,
31
(6), 797–810.
Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education,
58
1, 563–584.
De Hei, M. S. A., Sjoer, E. J., Strijbos, J. W., & Admiraal, W. F. (2016). Teacher educators’ design and implementation of group learning activities. Educational Studies,
42
(4), 394–409.
Denies, K., Yashima, T., & Janssen, R. (2015). Classroom versus societal willingness to communicate: Investigating French as a second language in Flanders. The Modern Language Journal,
99
(4), 718–739.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Fellenz, M. R. (2006). Toward fairness in assessing student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Journal of Management Education,
30
(4), 570–591.
Hennerby, M. L., & Fordyce, K. (2018). Cooperative learning on an international masters. Higher Education Research & Development,
37
(2), 270–284.
Hinds, P., K. Carley, K., D. Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
81
(2), 226–251.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning (5th ed). Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher,
38
(5), 365–379.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on achievement. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International handbook of student achievement (pp. 372–374). Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Roseth, C., & Shin, T. S. (2014). The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
44
(9), 622–633.
Judd, T., Kennedy, G., & Cropper, S. (2010). Using wikis for collaborative learning: Assessing collaboration through contribution. Australian Journal of Educational Technology,
26
(3), 341–354.
Kamau, C., & Spong, A. (2015). A student teamwork induction protocol. Studies in Higher Education,
40
(7), 1273–1290.
Laurie, M. (2019, August 28). At uni, English-speakers are now unpaid tutors. The Age.
Leeming, P. (2019). Emergent leadership and group interaction in the task-based language classroom. TESOL Quarterly,
53
(3), 768–793.
Leki, I. (2001). A narrow thinking system: Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly,
35
(1), 39–57.
Leki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy developments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liang, X. (2004). Cooperative learning as a sociocultural practice. The Canadian Modern Language Review,
6
(5), 637–668.
Mahenthiran, S., & Rouse, P. J. (2000). The impact of group selection on student performance and satisfaction. The International Journal of Educational Management,
14
(6), 255–264.
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review,
27
(4), 645–656.
Seethmaraju, R., & Borman, M. (2009). Influence of group formation choices on academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
34
(1), 31–40.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N. (2017). Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities in EAP classes. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 130–144). Routledge.
Strauss, P., & U, A. (2007). Group assessments: Dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development,
26
(2), 147–61.
Strauss, P., U, A., & Young, S. (2011). ‘I know the type of people I work well with’: Student anxiety in multicultural group projects. Studies in Higher Education,
36
(7), 815–829.
Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2008). Students’ attitudes toward culturally mixed groups on international campuses: Impact of participation in diverse and non-diverse groups. Studies in Higher Education,
33
(4), 357–370.
Walker, A. (2002). British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching,
1
(1), 28–36.
Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research,
40
(2), 247–262.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal,
86
(1), 54–66.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Storch, Neomy & Ute Knoch
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.