Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 22:1 (1999) ► pp.81–95
Metalinguistic knowledge
How important is it in studying a language at university?
This paper reports on a project (funded by a small Australian Research Council grant) investigating levels of metalinguistic knowledge of English and other languages amongst first-year undergraduate learners of French, Chinese and Italian and the relationship between this knowledge and success in studying a language at university. The study is a partial replication of research undertaken by Alderson, Clapham and Steel (1977) in relation to learners studying French at a number of British universities.
The findings offer no support for the widely-held view that there is a strong connection between learners’ knowledge about language and their success in foreign language study. Results show that, while undergraduate language learners have serious lacunae in their knowledge about language, those who have studied a language other than English (LOTE) at school do better on some measures of metalinguistic knowledge than those who are beginning language study from scratch. However, the results also show that for all three languages there is a weak relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and second language ability. The study points to areas of further research, including a more detailed examination of the relationship between metalinguistic awareness in L1 and L2 and an investigation of those areas of grammar that may be more amenable to explicit grammar teaching.
References
Alderson J. C., C. Clapham and D. Steel
(1997 forthcoming) Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language in Education.
Alderson, J. C.
(1995) Metalinguistic awareness and second language proficiency. Paper presented at BAAL, September 1995.
Bloor, T.
(1986a) What do language students know about grammar? British Journal of Language teaching, 241: 157–160.
(1986b) Variation and prescriptivism in English: Modern language students attitudes to some sociolinguistic issues. CLIE Working Papers Number 71. British Association for Applied Linguistics.
(1986c) University students’ knowledge about language. CLIE Working Papers Number 81. British Association for Applied Linguistics.
Carroll, J. B. and S. M. Sapon
(1959) The Modern Language Aptitude Test. Cleveland, Ohio: Harcourt, Brance, Jovanovich.
Carroll, J. B.
(1962) The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (ed.) Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Chapelle, C. and P. Green
(1992) Field dependence/independence in second language acquisition research. Language Learning 421: 47–83. 
Clapham, C.
(forthcoming) The assessment of metalinguistic knowledge. Language testing: social and research perspectives. Essays in honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, J.
(1996) Studying languages: the proficiency, background attitudes and motivation of students of foreign languages in the United Kingdom and Europe. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
Donmall, B. G.
(ed.) (1985) Language awareness. NCLE reports and papers 61. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
Dornyei, Z.
(1998) Motivation in second and foreign language learning Language Teaching 311, 117–135.
Davies, A.
(1971) Language aptitude in the first year of the UK secondary school. RELC Journal 2, 1: 4–19.
Davies, A., C. Elder, J. Hajek, D. Manwaring and J. Warren
(1996) What do they know? Language awareness amongst tertiary students of LOTE. Australian Language Matters 5, 1: 12.
Elder, C., A. Davies, J. Hajek, D. Manwaring and J. Warren
(1996) Is grammar good for you? The relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and success in studying a language at university. Melbourne Papers in Testing 5, 1: 35–55.
Ellis R.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, C. and P. Garrett
(eds) (1991) Language awareness in the classroom. London: Longman.
Lando, J.
(1996) These students were taught grammar: was it worthwhile? In C. Arbonés-Sola, J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds.) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar? Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers in Language Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 27–36.
Lightbown, P.
(1992) What have we here? Some observations of the influence of instruction on second language learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith and M. Swan (eds) Foreign/second language pedagogy research. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, 197–212.
Lowe, M. and L. Wales
(1996) Language awareness in L1 and its impact upon progress in L2. In C. Arbonés-Sola, J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar? Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers in Language Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 121–128.
McKay, P.
(1996) How communicative are we, how communicative should we be? In C. Arbonés-Sola, J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds.) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar? Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers in Language Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 11–26.
McLaughlin, B.
(1978) The monitor model: some methodological considerations. Language Learning 281: 309–352.
Mitchell, R.
(1988) Communicative language teaching in practice. London: CILT.
Richmond, J.
(1990) What do we mean by knowledge about language? In Ronald Carter (ed.) Knowledge about language and the curriculum: the LINC Reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Rutherford, W.E.
(1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
Sharwood Smith, M.
(1981) Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2:159–68.
Sorace. A.
(1985) Metalinguistic knowledge and use of the language in acquisition poor environments. Applied Linguistics 61: 239–54.
Steel, D. and J.C. Alderson
(1994) Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. In D. Graddol and S. Thomas (eds) Language in a changing Europe. Clevedon: BAAL and Multilingual Matters. 92–103.
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Azaz, Mahmoud
2017. Metalinguistic Knowledge of Salient vs. Unsalient Features: Evidence From the Arabic Construct State. Foreign Language Annals 50:1 ► pp. 214 ff. 
Dong, Yang, Shu-Na Peng, Yuan-Ke Sun, Sammy Xiao-Ying Wu & Wei-Sha Wang
2020. Reading Comprehension and Metalinguistic Knowledge in Chinese Readers: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10
D’Angelo, Francesca & Antonella Sorace
2022. The additive effect of metalinguistic awareness in third or additional language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:10 ► pp. 3551 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2004. The Definition and Measurement of L2 Explicit Knowledge. Language Learning 54:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2008. Explicit Knowledge and Second Language Learning and Pedagogy. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 1901 ff.
ERÇETİN, GÜLCAN & CEM ALPTEKİN
2013. The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for second-language reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 34:4 ► pp. 727 ff.
Esteki, Bahareh
2014. The Relationship between Implicit and Explicit Knowledge and Second Language Proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:7
Gutiérrez, Xavier
2013. Metalinguistic knowledge, metalingual knowledge, and proficiency in L2 Spanish. Language Awareness 22:2 ► pp. 176 ff.
Hu, Guangwei
2011. Metalinguistic knowledge, metalanguage, and their relationship in L2 learners. System 39:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Khayatan, Parinaz & Reza Biria
2017. The impact of translation on L2 learners’ metalinguistic competence. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 7:1
Mekala, S., M. Ponmani & M.P. Shabitha
2016. Transfer of Grammatical Knowledge into ESL Writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 47 ff.
Pourmohammadi, Azam, Firooz Sadighi, Mohammad Javad Riasati & Timo Ehmke
2021. Iranian EFL teachers’ receptive and productive metalinguistic knowledge: Does teaching context matter?. Cogent Education 8:1
Repo, Elisa, Riia Kivimäki, Niina Kekki & Jenni Alisaari
2021. “We thought about it together and the solution came to our minds”: languaging linguistic problem-solving in multilingual Finnish classrooms. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Roehr, Karen
2006. Metalinguistic Knowledge in L2 Task Performance: A Verbal Protocol Analysis. Language Awareness 15:3 ► pp. 180 ff.
Roehr, Karen
2008. Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Ability in University-Level L2 Learners. Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Roehr, Karen
2008. Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1
Roehr, Karen & Gábriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérrez
2009. The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning. Language Awareness 18:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2015. Explicit knowledge about language in L2 learning. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 48], ► pp. 117 ff.
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2024. Explicit and implicit knowledge and learning of an additional language: A research agenda. Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Roehr‐Brackin, Karen
2014. Explicit Knowledge and Processes From a Usage‐Based Perspective: The Developmental Trajectory of an Instructed L2 Learner. Language Learning 64:4 ► pp. 771 ff.
Rosales, Cesar & Julio Torres
2024. The role of metalinguistic knowledge in third-language development among heritage and late bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism
Sifakis, Nicos
2023. Metacognitive and metalinguistic activities can raise ELF awareness: why and how. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 12:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Ziętek, Agnieszka A. & Karen Roehr
2011. Metalinguistic knowledge and cognitive style in Polish classroom learners of English. System 39:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy, ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.