Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 25:1 (2002) ► pp.41–51
Towards standards of feedback on written assignments in language teacher education
As alliances are formed between various tertiary institutions within and beyond the same country, the issue of standards arises, particularly with reference to the marking of assignments. This is true not only of the summative grading of assignments but also of the formative effect of written feedback. This paper reports on an exercise in analysing, comparing and reflecting on the feedback offered by two university lecturers on postgraduate programmes for teachers. The writers examine retrospectively the written feedback each provided on written assignments and suggest how the information might be used to derive feedback standards that themselves would be the basis for further evaluation.
References (11)
Boswood, T., Dwyer, R., Hoffman, R. & Lockhart, C. (1993). Audiotaped feedback on writing. Department of English, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong. Research Report No. 24.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Freeman, D. & Cornwell, S. (Eds) (1993) New ways in teacher education. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman.
Johns, A. (1997). Text, role and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, M. & Starks, D. (1997). Revisiting examination questions in tertiary academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (3), 197–210.
Lewis, M. (1998). A study of feedback to language teachers. Prospect, 13 (1), 68–83.
Mirador, J. (2000). A move analysis of written feedback in higher education. RELC Journa, l 31 (1), 45–60.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanner, R. & Green, C. (1998). Tasks for teacher education: a reflective approach. Harlow: Addison, Wesley, Longman.