Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 25:1 (2002) ► pp.147–167
A useful kind of interaction? evaluations by university students of feedback on written assignments
In content subjects, university teachers hope that students find their comments on written assignments useful contributions to student learning of content and disciplinary writing. However, teachers often do not know what effect this form of interaction has on student readers. In this study we investigated student reactions to teacher feedback in a law subject. Data included teacher feedback written on 76 student assignments, responses by 72 students to a questionnaire about the feedback and interviews with 9 students. Responses from two groups were compared. One group (Group A) comprised students born in Australia or another English-speaking country and those born in non-English speaking countries but who had been residents in Australia for over seven years. The other group (Group B) comprised students born in non-English speaking countries and who had been resident in Australia for less than seven years. The students from both groups were most interested in specific comments on content matters and only half were interested in comments on written expression. Students from Group B were more likely than Group A students to find teacher comments useful for subsequent assignment writing. The responses from all students indicate that although they found teacher comments useful, they were not necessarily totally satisfied with the nature of the feedback.
References (20)
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9 (3), 227–258. 
Beason, L. (1993). Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 271, 395–422.
Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101–111.
Brown, S. & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 311, 315–340.
Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C.R. & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6 (2), 155–182.
Johnstone, R., Patterson, J. & Rubenstein, K. (1998). Improving criteria and feedback in student assessment in law . Sydney: Cavendish.
Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response, In B. Kroll (Ed) Second language writing: research insights from the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loacker, G. (1988). Faculty as a force to improve instruction through assessment. In J.H. McMillan (Ed) Assessing studentsy learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mclnnis, C., James, R. with McNaught, C. (1995). 1st year on campus: diversity in the initial experiences of Australian undergraduates. Commissioned project of the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne: AGPS.
Mahalski, P.A. (1992). Essay-writing: do study manuals give relevant advice? Higher Education, 241, 113 – 132.
Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C. & Magin, D. (1996). Assessing learning in universities. Sydney: University of NSW.
Powers, J. K. & Nelson, J. V. (1995). L2 writers and the Writing Center: a national survey of writing center conferencing at graduate institutions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 113–138.
Radecki, P. M. & Swales, J. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 161, 355–365.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Sadler, J.D. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 541, 11: 60–79.
Storch, N. & Tapper, J. (2000). The focus of teacher and student concerns in discipline-specific writing by university students. Journal of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, 19 (3), 337–355.
Straub, R. (1997). Student reaction to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 311, 97–119.
Tapper, J. & Storch, N. (2000). Writing in the disciplines: teacher feedback in a business law subject. In C. Beasley (Ed) Third Biennial Communication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference "Making the Critical Connection" (pp. 197–207). Murdoch, WA: Teaching & Learning Centre, Murdoch University.
Turner, K. (1993). An investigation of how students respond to feedback on coursework. Paper presented to the Measure for Measure Act II conference. Cited in Brown & Knight (1994).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Yamada, Kiyomi
2022. Undergraduate thesis supervisory conference: Academic discourse socialisation multiple-case study. Linguistics and Education 69 ► pp. 101054 ff. 
Morrell, Lesley J.
2021. Iterated assessment and feedback improves student outcomes. Studies in Higher Education 46:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Soler, Viviana
2018. Estudio exploratorio de títulos de tesis doctorales redactados en lengua española. Lebende Sprachen 63:2 ► pp. 374 ff.
Covic, Tanya & Mairwen K. Jones
2008. Is the essay resubmission option a formative or a summative assessment and does it matter as long as the grades improve?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Silva, Tony & Colleen Brice
2004. 4. RESEARCH IN TEACHING WRITING. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.