The effects of individual learner factors and task type on negotiation
A study of advanced Japanese & Korean ESL learners
Since the early 1980s, SLA research has been exploring the contribution of negotiated interaction to second language learning. Attention has been and continues to be given to the conditions that are necessary for L2 acquisition, the relationship between negotiated interaction and language learning, and factors that may facilitate the process. This article reports on a study which investigated the extent to which two individual learner variables (ethnocultural pairing and gender) and certain types of task (free conversation and decision-making tasks) have an effect on negotiation opportunities provided for and by advanced Japanese and Korean male and female ESL learners. Data from 24 dyads found that neither of the individual learner variables affected the amount of negotiation that occurred but that free conversation generated a significantly higher amount of negotiation than decision-making tasks.
References
Bitchener, J.
(
1999)
The negotiation of meaning by advanced ESL learners: The effects of individual learner factors and task type. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Coughlan, P. & Duff, P.
(
1994)
Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In
J. Lantolf and
G. Appel (Eds.)
Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Crookes, G. & Rulon, K.
(
1988)
Topic and feedback in native speaker/non-native speaker conversation.
TESOL Quarterly, 221, 675–681.
Day, R., Chenoweth, N., Chun, A. & Luppescu, S.
(
1984)
Corrective feedback in native-normative discourse.
Language Learning, 341, 19–45.
Doughty, C. & Pica, T.
(
1986)
Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 201, 305–325.
Duff, P.
(
1986)
Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In
R. Day (Ed.)
Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147–181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ellis, R.
(
2000)
Task-based research and language pedagogy.
Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 193–220.
Ellis, R. & He, X.
(
1999)
The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 285–301.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y & Yamazaki, A.
(
1994)
Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings.
Language Learning, 441, 449–491.
Foster, P.
(
1998)
A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning.
Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
(
1997)
Modifying the task: The effects of surprise, time and planning type on task based foreign language instruction.
Thames Valley Working Papers in English Language Teaching, 41, 19–45.
Freed, A. & Greenwood, A.
(
1996)
Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference? Language in Society, 251, 1–26.
Gass, S.
(
1997)
Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Gass, S., & Varonis, E.
(
1986)
Sex differences in NNS-NNS interactions. In
R. Day (Ed.)
Talking to learn: Conversations in second language acquisition (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gumperz, J.
(
1978)
The conversational analysis of interethnic communication. In
E. Lamar Ross (Ed.)
Interethnic communication (pp. 25–43). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Lantolf, J. & Appel, G.
(Eds.) (
1994)
Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Long, M.
(
1983)
Native speaker/normative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input.
Applied Linguistics, 41, 126–141.
Long, M.
(
1996)
The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In
W. Ritchie and
T. Bhatia (Eds.),
Handbook of language acquisition, Volume II: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Mackey, A.
(
1995)
Stepping up the pace: Input, interaction and interlanguage development: An empirical study of questions in ESL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
Mackey, A.
(
1999)
Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 557–587.
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L.
(
2001)
Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis.
TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 377–405.
Okamoto, S.
(
1995)
“Tasteless” Japanese. In
K. Hall &
M. Bucholtz (Eds.)
Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 297–325). New York: Routledge.
Pica, T.
(
1991)
Do second language learners need negotiation? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 101, 1–42.
Pica, T.
(
1992)
The textual outcomes of native speaker-normative speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about language learning? In
C. Kramsch &
S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.)
Text in context: Cross disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198–237). Lexington, MA: Heath.
Pica, T.
(
1994)
Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 441, 493–527.
Pica, T.
(
1996)
The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom.
JALT Journal, 181, 241–268.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J.
(
1993)
Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In
G. Crookes &
S. Gass (Eds.)
Task-based learning in a second language (pp. 9–34). London: Multilingual Matters.
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D. & Newman, J.
(
1991)
Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 131, 343–376.
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N. & Morgenthaler, L.
(
1989)
Comprehensible out- put as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 111, 63–90.
Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D. & Linnell, J.
(
1996)
Language learners interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 301, 59–84.
Plough, I., & Gass, S.
(
1993)
Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In
G. Crookes &
S. Gass (Eds.)
Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Reynolds, K.
(
1990)
Female speakers of Japanese in transition. In
S. Ide &
N. McGloin (Eds.)
Aspects of Japanese women’s language (pp. 129–146). Tokyo: Kuroshio.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, L.
(
1974)
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.
Language, 501, 696–735.
Sadow, S.
(
1982)
Idea bank: Creative activities for the language class. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Schmidt, R.
(
1990)
The role of consciousness in second language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158.
Schmidt, R.
(
1994)
Awareness and second language acquisition.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 121, 206–226.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.
(
1981)
Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Skehan, P.
(
1998)
A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Song, K.
(
1993)
An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of argument strategies in Korean conversational discourse: Negotiating disagreement and conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Sparenta, L.
(Ed.) (
1980)
Towards the creative teaching of English. London: George, Allen and Unwin.
Varonis, E. & Gass, S.
(
1985)
Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning.
Applied Linguistics, 61, 71–90.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Adams, Rebecca & Lauren Ross-Feldman
2021.
Gender Effects. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching,
► pp. 668 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.