Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2004) ► pp.1529
Allen, D.
(1980) English teaching since 1965. How much growth? London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Belsey, C.
(2002) (2nd Ed.) Critical Practice. London and NY: Routledge/FalmerGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B.
(1971) Class, codes and control. Volume 1. Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London, Henley and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1975) Class, codes and control. Volume 3. Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F.
(1993) The “received tradition” of English teaching: the decline of rhetoric and the corruption of grammar. In B. Green (Ed.) The insistence of the letter. Literacy studies and curriculum theorizing. (Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education Series. Ed. A. Luke). London and Washington: Falmer Press, pages 75-106.Google Scholar
(2002) The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. J. Schleppegrell and M.C. Colombi (Eds.) Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages. Meaning with power. Mahwah, NJ and London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(in press) Authority and its role in the pedagogic relationship of schooling. In L. Young and C. Harrison Eds Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: studies in social change London and NY Continuum Press
Christie, F. and Rothery, J.
(1979) English in Australia: an interpretation of role in the curriculum.. In J. Maling-Keepes and B.D. Keepes (Eds.) Language in education. The Language Development Project Phase 1. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre, pages 193-242.Google Scholar
Commissioners of National Education, Ireland
(1856) An English grammar for the use of schools. Dublin: Thom.Google Scholar
Connell, W.F.
(1980) A history of education in the twentieth century. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Constable’s Educative Series (ND)
The primer. Edinburgh: Laurie.
Curriculum Development Centre
(1978) Language development project occasional paper number 1. Curriculum Development Centre: Canberra.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.
(1967) Growth through English. Oxford: NATE and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, P.
(1974) Language, English’ and the curriculum. Schools Council Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Foster, W. and Bryant, H.
ND) The new graded word book for Australian schools. Junior and senior classes. Sydney: Land Printing House.
Hasan, R. and Martin, J.R.
Eds. Language development: learning language, learning culture. Meaning and choice in language: studies for Michael Halliday Advances in Discourse Processes Series Volume XXVII1 Series Editor R.O. Freedle Norwood, NJ Ablex
Hunter, I.
(1994) Rethinking the school, subjectivity bureaucracy criticism. Sydney: Allen and Unwin:Google Scholar
Leavis, F.R. and Thompson, D.
(1964) Culture and the environment. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and Rose, D.
(2003) Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London and NY: ContinuumGoogle Scholar
Murray, L.
(1795) English grammar. Facsimile reprint No.106 (1968) Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Peel, R., Patterson, A. and Gerlach, J.
(2000) Questions of English. Ethics, aesthetics, rhetoric, and the formation of the subject English in England, Australia and the United States. London and NY: Routledhge/Falmer.Google Scholar
’Plowden Report, The’
(1967) Children and their primary schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Standards for Teachers of English Language and Literacy in Australia
Street, B.
(1997) ‘The implications of the “New Literacy Studies” for literacy education’. English in Education, Vol. 31, No. 3, pages 45-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1993) Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge, NY and Oakleigh, Victoria.Google Scholar
(Ed.)(2001) Literacy and development. London and NY: Routledge DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Stages of schooling curriculum, middle years reform, and the implications for “subject English’” VATE Newsletter 51,1-3.Google Scholar